These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22686845)

  • 1. Assessing the chances of success: naïve statistics versus kind experience.
    Hogarth RM; Mukherjee K; Soyer E
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jan; 39(1):14-32. PubMed ID: 22686845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Probability theory, not the very guide of life.
    Juslin P; Nilsson H; Winman A
    Psychol Rev; 2009 Oct; 116(4):856-74. PubMed ID: 19839686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modulation of aggressive behaviour by fighting experience: mechanisms and contest outcomes.
    Hsu Y; Earley RL; Wolf LL
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2006 Feb; 81(1):33-74. PubMed ID: 16460581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Learning from experience in nonlinear environments: Evidence from a competition scenario.
    Soyer E; Hogarth RM
    Cogn Psychol; 2015 Sep; 81():48-73. PubMed ID: 26323528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Surprisingly rational: probability theory plus noise explains biases in judgment.
    Costello F; Watts P
    Psychol Rev; 2014 Jul; 121(3):463-80. PubMed ID: 25090427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Normal aging affects decisions under ambiguity, but not decisions under risk.
    Zamarian L; Sinz H; Bonatti E; Gamboz N; Delazer M
    Neuropsychology; 2008 Sep; 22(5):645-57. PubMed ID: 18763884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is there something special with probabilities?--insight vs. computational ability in multiple risk combination.
    Juslin P; Lindskog M; Mayerhofer B
    Cognition; 2015 Mar; 136():282-303. PubMed ID: 25514208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sequentially simulated outcomes: kind experience versus nontransparent description.
    Hogarth RM; Soyer E
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 Aug; 140(3):434-63. PubMed ID: 21639669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Strength of evidence, judged probability, and choice under uncertainty.
    Fox CR
    Cogn Psychol; 1999 Feb; 38(1):167-89. PubMed ID: 10090802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the provenance of judgments of conditional probability.
    Zhao J; Shah A; Osherson D
    Cognition; 2009 Oct; 113(1):26-36. PubMed ID: 19665110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of ambiguity and risk on decision making in mild Alzheimer's disease.
    Sinz H; Zamarian L; Benke T; Wenning GK; Delazer M
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):2043-55. PubMed ID: 18339408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. People's conditional probability judgments follow probability theory (plus noise).
    Costello F; Watts P
    Cogn Psychol; 2016 Sep; 89():106-33. PubMed ID: 27570097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Decision makers conceive of their choices as interventions.
    Hagmayer Y; Sloman SA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Feb; 138(1):22-38. PubMed ID: 19203168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inferring conjunctive probabilities from noisy samples: evidence for the configural weighted average model.
    Jenny MA; Rieskamp J; Nilsson H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):203-17. PubMed ID: 24128388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Heuristics can produce surprisingly rational probability estimates: Comment on Costello and Watts (2014).
    Nilsson H; Juslin P; Winman A
    Psychol Rev; 2016 Jan; 123(1):103-11. PubMed ID: 26709414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Value-induced bias in medical decision making.
    Levy AG; Hershey JC
    Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(2):269-76. PubMed ID: 18349431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Integration of base rates and new information in an abstract hypothesis-testing task.
    Rusconi P; Marelli M; Russo S; D'Addario M; Cherubini P
    Br J Psychol; 2013 May; 104(2):193-211. PubMed ID: 23560666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reducing cognitive biases in probabilistic reasoning by the use of logarithm formats.
    Juslin P; Nilsson H; Winman A; Lindskog M
    Cognition; 2011 Aug; 120(2):248-67. PubMed ID: 21640337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Overconfidence effects in category learning: a comparison of connectionist and exemplar memory models.
    Sieck WR; Yates JF
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Jul; 27(4):1003-21. PubMed ID: 11486916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comments on quantum probability theory.
    Sloman S
    Top Cogn Sci; 2014 Jan; 6(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 24482328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.