These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22686848)

  • 1. Visual statistical learning based on the perceptual and semantic information of objects.
    Otsuka S; Nishiyama M; Nakahara F; Kawaguchi J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jan; 39(1):196-207. PubMed ID: 22686848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gift from statistical learning: Visual statistical learning enhances memory for sequence elements and impairs memory for items that disrupt regularities.
    Otsuka S; Saiki J
    Cognition; 2016 Feb; 147():113-26. PubMed ID: 26688065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. When believing is seeing: the role of predictions in shaping visual perception.
    Król ME; El-Deredy W
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Sep; 64(9):1743-71. PubMed ID: 21824013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. N250 ERP correlates of the acquisition of face representations across different images.
    Kaufmann JM; Schweinberger SR; Burton AM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 21(4):625-41. PubMed ID: 18702593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Depth of conceptual knowledge modulates visual processes during word reading.
    Rabovsky M; Sommer W; Abdel Rahman R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Apr; 24(4):990-1005. PubMed ID: 21861677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The neural basis for simulated drawing and the semantic implications.
    Harrington GS; Farias D; Davis CH
    Cortex; 2009 Mar; 45(3):386-93. PubMed ID: 19111291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Repetition suppression in occipital-temporal visual areas is modulated by physical rather than semantic features of objects.
    Chouinard PA; Morrissey BF; Köhler S; Goodale MA
    Neuroimage; 2008 May; 41(1):130-44. PubMed ID: 18375148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neural impact of the semantic content of visual mental images and visual percepts.
    Mazard A; Laou L; Joliot M; Mellet E
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):423-35. PubMed ID: 16099355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The co-occurrence of multisensory facilitation and cross-modal conflict in the human brain.
    Diaconescu AO; Alain C; McIntosh AR
    J Neurophysiol; 2011 Dec; 106(6):2896-909. PubMed ID: 21880944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Implicit word learning benefits from semantic richness: electrophysiological and behavioral evidence.
    Rabovsky M; Sommer W; Abdel Rahman R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jul; 38(4):1076-83. PubMed ID: 21928930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Semantic learning modifies perceptual face processing.
    Heisz JJ; Shedden JM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 21(6):1127-34. PubMed ID: 18752406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transient perceptual neglect: visual working memory load affects conscious object processing.
    Emrich SM; Burianová H; Ferber S
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Oct; 23(10):2968-82. PubMed ID: 21452935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Integration of perceptual information in word access.
    Richter T; Zwaan RA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jan; 63(1):81-107. PubMed ID: 19424906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of multisensory memories in unisensory object discrimination.
    Lehmann S; Murray MM
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Jul; 24(2):326-34. PubMed ID: 15993770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How visual and semantic information influence learning in familiar contexts.
    Goujon A; Brockmole JR; Ehinger KA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Oct; 38(5):1315-27. PubMed ID: 22612057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. View combination: a generalization mechanism for visual recognition.
    Friedman A; Waller D; Thrash T; Greenauer N; Hodgson E
    Cognition; 2011 May; 119(2):229-41. PubMed ID: 21334606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perceptual fluency, semantic familiarity and recognition-related familiarity: an electrophysiological exploration.
    Nessler D; Mecklinger A; Penney TB
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Feb; 22(2):265-88. PubMed ID: 15653299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Failing to get the gist: reduced false recognition of semantic associates in semantic dementia.
    Simons JS; Verfaellie M; Hodges JR; Lee AC; Graham KS; Koutstaal W; Schacter DL; Budson AE
    Neuropsychology; 2005 May; 19(3):353-61. PubMed ID: 15910121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of study context on item recollection.
    Skinner EI; Fernandes MA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jul; 63(7):1318-34. PubMed ID: 19890765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Semantic context and visual feature effects in object naming: an fMRI study using arterial spin labeling.
    Hocking J; McMahon KL; de Zubicaray GI
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1571-83. PubMed ID: 18823254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.