155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22687378)
1. Preoperative vascular evaluation with computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis.
Zhang Y; Huang J; Chen M; Jiao LR
Pancreatology; 2012; 12(3):227-33. PubMed ID: 22687378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A meta-analysis of ¹⁸FDG-PET-CT, ¹⁸FDG-PET, MRI and bone scintigraphy for diagnosis of bone metastases in patients with lung cancer.
Qu X; Huang X; Yan W; Wu L; Dai K
Eur J Radiol; 2012 May; 81(5):1007-15. PubMed ID: 21354739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging compared with fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for pancreatic malignancy: a meta-analysis using a hierarchical regression model.
Wu LM; Hu JN; Hua J; Liu MJ; Chen J; Xu JR
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2012 Jun; 27(6):1027-35. PubMed ID: 22414092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic precision of magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative prediction of the circumferential margin involvement in patients with rectal cancer.
Purkayastha S; Tekkis PP; Athanasiou T; Tilney HS; Darzi AW; Heriot AG
Colorectal Dis; 2007 Jun; 9(5):402-11. PubMed ID: 17504336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic performance of computer tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography or positron emission tomography/computer tomography for detection of metastatic lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer: meta-analysis.
Choi HJ; Ju W; Myung SK; Kim Y
Cancer Sci; 2010 Jun; 101(6):1471-9. PubMed ID: 20298252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A prospective diagnostic accuracy study of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography, multidetector row computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in primary diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer.
Kauhanen SP; Komar G; Seppänen MP; Dean KI; Minn HR; Kajander SA; Rinta-Kiikka I; Alanen K; Borra RJ; Puolakkainen PA; Nuutila P; Ovaska JT
Ann Surg; 2009 Dec; 250(6):957-63. PubMed ID: 19687736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Value of magnetic resonance imaging for nodal staging in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis.
Wu LM; Xu JR; Liu MJ; Zhang XF; Hua J; Zheng J; Hu JN
Acad Radiol; 2012 Mar; 19(3):331-40. PubMed ID: 22153656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison between 3-T magnetic resonance imaging and multi-detector row computed tomography for the preoperative evaluation of rectal cancer.
Kim CK; Kim SH; Choi D; Kim MJ; Chun HK; Lee SJ; Lee JM
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(6):853-9. PubMed ID: 18043346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [MRI in the evaluation of peripancreatic vessel invasion and resectability of pancreatic carcinoma].
Wang DQ; Zeng MS; Jin DY; Lou WH; Ji Y; Rao SX; Shi X; Chen CZ; Li RC
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2007 Nov; 29(11):846-9. PubMed ID: 18396644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Liver lesion detection and characterization in patients with colorectal cancer: a comparison of low radiation dose non-enhanced PET/CT, contrast-enhanced PET/CT, and liver MRI.
Cantwell CP; Setty BN; Holalkere N; Sahani DV; Fischman AJ; Blake MA
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2008; 32(5):738-44. PubMed ID: 18830103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Early invasive cervical cancer: tumor delineation by magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and clinical examination, verified by pathologic results, in the ACRIN 6651/GOG 183 Intergroup Study.
Mitchell DG; Snyder B; Coakley F; Reinhold C; Thomas G; Amendola M; Schwartz LH; Woodward P; Pannu H; Hricak H
J Clin Oncol; 2006 Dec; 24(36):5687-94. PubMed ID: 17179104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validity of intraoperative gross examination of myometrial invasion in patients with endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis.
Mavromatis ID; Antonopoulos CN; Matsoukis IL; Frangos CC; Skalkidou A; Creatsas G; Petridou ET
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2012 Jul; 91(7):779-93. PubMed ID: 22452291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Value of diffusion-weighted imaging for the discrimination of pancreatic lesions: a meta-analysis.
Wu LM; Xu JR; Hua J; Gu HY; Zhang XF; Lu Q; Hu JN
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2012 Feb; 24(2):134-42. PubMed ID: 22241215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Preoperative renal tumor evaluation by three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging: Staging and detection of multifocality.
Huang GJ; Israel G; Berman A; Taneja SS
Urology; 2004 Sep; 64(3):453-7. PubMed ID: 15351569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Identification of patients with resectable pancreatic cancer: at what stage are we?
Gorelick AB; Scheiman JM; Fendrick AM
Am J Gastroenterol; 1998 Oct; 93(10):1995-6. PubMed ID: 9772077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Magnetic resonance and computed tomography compared in the staging of rhinosinusal neoplasms. A cost-effectiveness evaluation].
Maroldi R; Farina D; Battaglia G; Maculotti P; Chiesa A
Radiol Med; 1996 Mar; 91(3):211-8. PubMed ID: 8628933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Quantitative evaluation for diagnostic efficacy of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in patients with lumbar disc herniation].
Yu XW; Niu G; Yang J; Ni L; Zhang WS; Guo YM
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Jan; 91(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 21418957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of diagnosis of salivary gland tumors with the use of ultrasonography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging: a meta-analysis.
Liu Y; Li J; Tan YR; Xiong P; Zhong LP
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2015 Feb; 119(2):238-245.e2. PubMed ID: 25577417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Value of spiral CT and MRI (1.5 T) in preoperative diagnosis of tumors of the head of the pancreas].
Pauls S; Sokiranski R; Schwarz M; Rieber A; Möller P; Brambs HJ
Rontgenpraxis; 2003; 55(1):3-15. PubMed ID: 12650033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Downstaging chemotherapy and alteration in the classic computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging signs of vascular involvement in patients with pancreaticobiliary malignant tumors: influence on patient selection for surgery.
Donahue TR; Isacoff WH; Hines OJ; Tomlinson JS; Farrell JJ; Bhat YM; Garon E; Clerkin B; Reber HA
Arch Surg; 2011 Jul; 146(7):836-43. PubMed ID: 21768431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
