BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22687704)

  • 1. User-experience surveys with maternity services: a randomized comparison of two data collection models.
    Bjertnaes OA; Iversen HH
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2012 Aug; 24(4):433-8. PubMed ID: 22687704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A randomized comparison of three data collection models for the measurement of parent experiences with diabetes outpatient care.
    Bjertnaes O; Iversen HH; Skrivarhaug T
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Sep; 18(1):95. PubMed ID: 30236067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of a postal survey and mixed-mode survey using a questionnaire on patients' experiences with breast care.
    Zuidgeest M; Hendriks M; Koopman L; Spreeuwenberg P; Rademakers J
    J Med Internet Res; 2011 Sep; 13(3):e68. PubMed ID: 21946048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Methods to increase response rates to a population-based maternity survey: a comparison of two pilot studies.
    Harrison S; Henderson J; Alderdice F; Quigley MA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Mar; 19(1):65. PubMed ID: 30894130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of e-mail, fax, and postal surveys of pediatricians.
    McMahon SR; Iwamoto M; Massoudi MS; Yusuf HR; Stevenson JM; David F; Chu SY; Pickering LK
    Pediatrics; 2003 Apr; 111(4 Pt 1):e299-303. PubMed ID: 12671142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Combining Internet-Based and Postal Survey Methods in a Survey among Gynecologists: Results of a Randomized Trial.
    Ernst SA; Brand T; Lhachimi SK; Zeeb H
    Health Serv Res; 2018 Apr; 53(2):879-895. PubMed ID: 28217941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Paper- or Web-Based Questionnaire Invitations as a Method for Data Collection: Cross-Sectional Comparative Study of Differences in Response Rate, Completeness of Data, and Financial Cost.
    Ebert JF; Huibers L; Christensen B; Christensen MB
    J Med Internet Res; 2018 Jan; 20(1):e24. PubMed ID: 29362206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patient-reported experiences with general practitioners: a randomised study of mail and web-based approaches following a national survey.
    Iversen HH; Holmboe O; Bjertnaes O
    BMJ Open; 2020 Oct; 10(10):e036533. PubMed ID: 33051230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Data collection methods and results in user surveys in mental health care].
    Bjertnaes ØA; Garratt A; Johannessen JO
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 May; 126(11):1481-3. PubMed ID: 16732343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A questionnaire to measure women's experiences with pregnancy, birth and postnatal care: instrument development and assessment following a national survey in Norway.
    Sjetne IS; Iversen HH; Kjøllesdal JG
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2015 Aug; 15():182. PubMed ID: 26294064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A randomized trial found online questionnaires supplemented by postal reminders generated a cost-effective and generalizable sample but don't forget the reminders.
    Loban A; Mandefield L; Hind D; Bradburn M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Dec; 92():116-125. PubMed ID: 28844786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measuring client experiences in maternity care under change: development of a questionnaire based on the WHO Responsiveness model.
    Scheerhagen M; van Stel HF; Birnie E; Franx A; Bonsel GJ
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(2):e0117031. PubMed ID: 25671310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. E-mail versus conventional postal mail survey of geriatric chiefs.
    Raziano DB; Jayadevappa R; Valenzula D; Weiner M; Lavizzo-Mourey R
    Gerontologist; 2001 Dec; 41(6):799-804. PubMed ID: 11723348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electronic mail was not better than postal mail for surveying residents and faculty.
    Akl EA; Maroun N; Klocke RA; Montori V; Schünemann HJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Apr; 58(4):425-9. PubMed ID: 15862729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating telephone follow-up of a mail survey of community pharmacies.
    Westrick SC; Mount JK
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2007 Jun; 3(2):160-82. PubMed ID: 17561218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Self-rated health assessed by web versus mail modes in a mixed mode survey: the digital divide effect and the genuine survey mode effect.
    Shim JM; Shin E; Johnson TP
    Med Care; 2013 Sep; 51(9):774-81. PubMed ID: 23774510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. No increase in response rate by adding a web response option to a postal population survey: a randomized trial.
    Brøgger J; Nystad W; Cappelen I; Bakke P
    J Med Internet Res; 2007 Dec; 9(5):e40. PubMed ID: 18174120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nonresponse bias and cost-effectiveness in a Norwegian survey of family physicians.
    Bjertnaes OA; Garratt A; Botten G
    Eval Health Prof; 2008 Mar; 31(1):65-80. PubMed ID: 18174607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Getting a Valid Survey Response From 662 Plastic Surgeons in the 21st Century.
    Reinisch JF; Yu DC; Li WY
    Ann Plast Surg; 2016 Jan; 76(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 26418779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Following up nonrespondents to an online weight management intervention: randomized trial comparing mail versus telephone.
    Couper MP; Peytchev A; Strecher VJ; Rothert K; Anderson J
    J Med Internet Res; 2007 Jun; 9(2):e16. PubMed ID: 17567564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.