These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22687704)

  • 1. User-experience surveys with maternity services: a randomized comparison of two data collection models.
    Bjertnaes OA; Iversen HH
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2012 Aug; 24(4):433-8. PubMed ID: 22687704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A randomized comparison of three data collection models for the measurement of parent experiences with diabetes outpatient care.
    Bjertnaes O; Iversen HH; Skrivarhaug T
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Sep; 18(1):95. PubMed ID: 30236067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of a postal survey and mixed-mode survey using a questionnaire on patients' experiences with breast care.
    Zuidgeest M; Hendriks M; Koopman L; Spreeuwenberg P; Rademakers J
    J Med Internet Res; 2011 Sep; 13(3):e68. PubMed ID: 21946048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Methods to increase response rates to a population-based maternity survey: a comparison of two pilot studies.
    Harrison S; Henderson J; Alderdice F; Quigley MA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Mar; 19(1):65. PubMed ID: 30894130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of e-mail, fax, and postal surveys of pediatricians.
    McMahon SR; Iwamoto M; Massoudi MS; Yusuf HR; Stevenson JM; David F; Chu SY; Pickering LK
    Pediatrics; 2003 Apr; 111(4 Pt 1):e299-303. PubMed ID: 12671142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Combining Internet-Based and Postal Survey Methods in a Survey among Gynecologists: Results of a Randomized Trial.
    Ernst SA; Brand T; Lhachimi SK; Zeeb H
    Health Serv Res; 2018 Apr; 53(2):879-895. PubMed ID: 28217941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Paper- or Web-Based Questionnaire Invitations as a Method for Data Collection: Cross-Sectional Comparative Study of Differences in Response Rate, Completeness of Data, and Financial Cost.
    Ebert JF; Huibers L; Christensen B; Christensen MB
    J Med Internet Res; 2018 Jan; 20(1):e24. PubMed ID: 29362206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patient-reported experiences with general practitioners: a randomised study of mail and web-based approaches following a national survey.
    Iversen HH; Holmboe O; Bjertnaes O
    BMJ Open; 2020 Oct; 10(10):e036533. PubMed ID: 33051230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Data collection methods and results in user surveys in mental health care].
    Bjertnaes ØA; Garratt A; Johannessen JO
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 May; 126(11):1481-3. PubMed ID: 16732343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A questionnaire to measure women's experiences with pregnancy, birth and postnatal care: instrument development and assessment following a national survey in Norway.
    Sjetne IS; Iversen HH; Kjøllesdal JG
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2015 Aug; 15():182. PubMed ID: 26294064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A randomized trial found online questionnaires supplemented by postal reminders generated a cost-effective and generalizable sample but don't forget the reminders.
    Loban A; Mandefield L; Hind D; Bradburn M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Dec; 92():116-125. PubMed ID: 28844786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measuring client experiences in maternity care under change: development of a questionnaire based on the WHO Responsiveness model.
    Scheerhagen M; van Stel HF; Birnie E; Franx A; Bonsel GJ
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(2):e0117031. PubMed ID: 25671310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. E-mail versus conventional postal mail survey of geriatric chiefs.
    Raziano DB; Jayadevappa R; Valenzula D; Weiner M; Lavizzo-Mourey R
    Gerontologist; 2001 Dec; 41(6):799-804. PubMed ID: 11723348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electronic mail was not better than postal mail for surveying residents and faculty.
    Akl EA; Maroun N; Klocke RA; Montori V; Schünemann HJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Apr; 58(4):425-9. PubMed ID: 15862729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating telephone follow-up of a mail survey of community pharmacies.
    Westrick SC; Mount JK
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2007 Jun; 3(2):160-82. PubMed ID: 17561218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Self-rated health assessed by web versus mail modes in a mixed mode survey: the digital divide effect and the genuine survey mode effect.
    Shim JM; Shin E; Johnson TP
    Med Care; 2013 Sep; 51(9):774-81. PubMed ID: 23774510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. No increase in response rate by adding a web response option to a postal population survey: a randomized trial.
    Brøgger J; Nystad W; Cappelen I; Bakke P
    J Med Internet Res; 2007 Dec; 9(5):e40. PubMed ID: 18174120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nonresponse bias and cost-effectiveness in a Norwegian survey of family physicians.
    Bjertnaes OA; Garratt A; Botten G
    Eval Health Prof; 2008 Mar; 31(1):65-80. PubMed ID: 18174607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Getting a Valid Survey Response From 662 Plastic Surgeons in the 21st Century.
    Reinisch JF; Yu DC; Li WY
    Ann Plast Surg; 2016 Jan; 76(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 26418779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Following up nonrespondents to an online weight management intervention: randomized trial comparing mail versus telephone.
    Couper MP; Peytchev A; Strecher VJ; Rothert K; Anderson J
    J Med Internet Res; 2007 Jun; 9(2):e16. PubMed ID: 17567564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.