146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22687704)
21. Cost-effectiveness of a lottery for increasing physicians' responses to a mail survey.
Baron G; De Wals P; Milord F
Eval Health Prof; 2001 Mar; 24(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 11233584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Interviews or postal questionnaires? Comparisons of data about women's experiences with maternity services.
Cartwright A
Milbank Q; 1988; 66(1):172-89. PubMed ID: 3173261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Electronic surveys: how to maximise success.
McPeake J; Bateson M; O'Neill A
Nurse Res; 2014 Jan; 21(3):24-6. PubMed ID: 24460562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A randomized trial of the impact of certified mail on response rate to a physician survey, and a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Del Valle ML; Morgenstern H; Rogstad TL; Albright C; Vickrey BG
Eval Health Prof; 1997 Dec; 20(4):389-406. PubMed ID: 10183331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Patient-reported experiences with hospitals: comparison of proxy and patient scores using propensity-score matching.
Bjertnaes O
Int J Qual Health Care; 2014 Feb; 26(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 24334233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. International health policy survey in 11 countries: assessment of non-response bias in the Norwegian sample.
Bjertnaes OA; Iversen HH; Bukholm G
BMC Health Serv Res; 2010 Feb; 10():38. PubMed ID: 20146819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Timing payments to subjects of mail surveys: cost-effectiveness and bias.
Schweitzer M; Asch DA
J Clin Epidemiol; 1995 Nov; 48(11):1325-9. PubMed ID: 7490595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The Danish health and morbidity surveys: study design and participant characteristics.
Jensen HAR; Ekholm O; Davidsen M; Christensen AI
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 May; 19(1):91. PubMed ID: 31053088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. In Canada, anesthesiologists are less likely to respond to an electronic, compared to a paper questionnaire.
VanDenKerkhof EG; Parlow JL; Goldstein DH; Milne B
Can J Anaesth; 2004 May; 51(5):449-54. PubMed ID: 15128630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Postal surveys versus electronic mail surveys. The tortoise and the hare revisited.
Mavis BE; Brocato JJ
Eval Health Prof; 1998 Sep; 21(3):395-408. PubMed ID: 10350958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A descriptive survey of data collection in breastfeeding services at Victorian maternity hospitals.
Bergman R; Amir LH; Watson L
Breastfeed Rev; 2002 Nov; 10(3):25-9. PubMed ID: 12592777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Electronic reminders did not improve postal questionnaire response rates or response times: a randomized controlled trial.
Man MS; Tilbrook HE; Jayakody S; Hewitt CE; Cox H; Cross B; Torgerson DJ
J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Sep; 64(9):1001-4. PubMed ID: 21292441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Postal survey on airborne occupational exposure and respiratory disorders in Norway: causes and consequences of non-response.
Bakke P; Gulsvik A; Lilleng P; Overå O; Hanoa R; Eide GE
J Epidemiol Community Health; 1990 Dec; 44(4):316-20. PubMed ID: 2277255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Is it too early to move to full electronic PROM data collection?: A randomized controlled trial comparing PROM's after hallux valgus captured by e-mail, traditional mail and telephone.
Palmen LN; Schrier JC; Scholten R; Jansen JH; Koëter S
Foot Ankle Surg; 2016 Mar; 22(1):46-9. PubMed ID: 26869500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A comparison of two distribution methods on response rates to a patient safety questionnaire in nursing homes.
Lapane KL; Quilliam BJ; Hughes CM
J Am Med Dir Assoc; 2007 Sep; 8(7):446-52. PubMed ID: 17845947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Electronic prompts significantly increase response rates to postal questionnaires: a randomized trial within a randomized trial and meta-analysis.
Clark L; Ronaldson S; Dyson L; Hewitt C; Torgerson D; Adamson J
J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Dec; 68(12):1446-50. PubMed ID: 25709076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Efficiencies of Internet-based digital and paper-based scientific surveys and the estimated costs and time for different-sized cohorts.
Uhlig CE; Seitz B; Eter N; Promesberger J; Busse H
PLoS One; 2014; 9(10):e108441. PubMed ID: 25313672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of mailed vs. on-site emergency department patient satisfaction surveys.
Yarris LM; Fu R; Duby R; Frakes B; Brooks H; Norton RL
J Emerg Med; 2014 Dec; 47(6):702-9. PubMed ID: 25281169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparing Web and Mail Protocols for Administering Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Surveys.
Fowler FJ; Brenner PS; Hargraves JL; Cleary PD
Med Care; 2021 Oct; 59(10):907-912. PubMed ID: 34334736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Patient satisfaction or acquiescence? Comparing mail and telephone survey results.
Hall MF
J Health Care Mark; 1995; 15(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 10142388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
