These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22688538)

  • 1. When is guessing incorrectly better than studying for enhancing memory?
    Vaughn KE; Rawson KA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Oct; 19(5):899-905. PubMed ID: 22688538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Why does guessing incorrectly enhance, rather than impair, retention?
    Yan VX; Yu Y; Garcia MA; Bjork RA
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Nov; 42(8):1373-83. PubMed ID: 25120240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. You won't guess that: On the limited benefits of guessing when learning a foreign language.
    Butowska E; Hanczakowski M; Zawadzka K
    Mem Cognit; 2022 Jul; 50(5):1033-1047. PubMed ID: 34913140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The benefits of impossible tests: Assessing the role of error-correction in the pretesting effect.
    Seabrooke T; Mitchell CJ; Wills AJ; Inkster AB; Hollins TJ
    Mem Cognit; 2022 Feb; 50(2):296-311. PubMed ID: 34363196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Guessing can benefit memory for related word pairs even when feedback is delayed.
    Zawadzka K; Zaborowska O; Butowska E; Piątkowski K; Hanczakowski M
    Mem Cognit; 2023 Jul; 51(5):1235-1248. PubMed ID: 36633821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Two routes to memory benefits of guessing.
    Zawadzka K; Hanczakowski M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Oct; 45(10):1748-1760. PubMed ID: 30570326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Metamemory expectancy illusion and schema-consistent guessing in source monitoring.
    Schaper ML; Kuhlmann BG; Bayen UJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Mar; 45(3):470-496. PubMed ID: 30024249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating the contributions of task expectancy in the testing and guessing benefits on recognition memory.
    Huff MJ; Yates TJ; Balota DA
    Memory; 2018 Sep; 26(8):1065-1083. PubMed ID: 29723114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of forced recall on illusory recollection in younger and older adults.
    Meade ML; Roediger HL
    Am J Psychol; 2006; 119(3):433-62. PubMed ID: 17061694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The benefit of generating errors during learning: What is the locus of the effect?
    Potts R; Davies G; Shanks DR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Jun; 45(6):1023-1041. PubMed ID: 30024254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The spatiotemporal gradient of intrusion errors in continuous outcome source memory: Source retrieval is affected by both guessing and intrusions.
    Zhou J; Osth AF; Smith PL
    Cogn Psychol; 2023 Mar; 141():101552. PubMed ID: 36867946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. When and why a failed test potentiates the effectiveness of subsequent study.
    Hays MJ; Kornell N; Bjork RA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jan; 39(1):290-6. PubMed ID: 22582968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diminishing-cues retrieval practice: A memory-enhancing technique that works when regular testing doesn't.
    Fiechter JL; Benjamin AS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Oct; 25(5):1868-1876. PubMed ID: 28849580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hierarchical modeling of contingency-based source monitoring: a test of the probability-matching account.
    Arnold NR; Bayen UJ; Kuhlmann BG; Vaterrodt B
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Apr; 20(2):326-33. PubMed ID: 23224987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Monitoring memory errors: the influence of the veracity of retrieved information on the accuracy of judgements of learning.
    Rhodes MG; Tauber SK
    Memory; 2011 Nov; 19(8):853-70. PubMed ID: 21999219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Guessing versus misremembering in recognition: A comparison of continuous, two-high-threshold, and low-threshold models.
    Starns JJ; Ma Q
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Apr; 44(4):527-539. PubMed ID: 28933897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is spacing really the "friend of induction"?
    Verkoeijen PP; Bouwmeester S
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():259. PubMed ID: 24744742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of unsuccessful retrieval on children's subsequent learning.
    Carneiro P; Lapa A; Finn B
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2018 Feb; 166():400-420. PubMed ID: 29032207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Repeated guessing attempts during acquisition can promote subsequent recall performance.
    Kliegl O; Bartl J; Bäuml KT
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2024 Jun; 30(2):282-292. PubMed ID: 37561423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Guess what? Different source-guessing strategies for old versus new information.
    Wulff L; Bell R; Mieth L; Kuhlmann BG
    Memory; 2021 Mar; 29(3):416-426. PubMed ID: 33726623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.