BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22689274)

  • 1. Successful placement of the Essure device after a failed procedure using the Adiana system for hysteroscopic sterilisation.
    Schuurman T; Veersema S
    BMJ Case Rep; 2011 Aug; 2011():. PubMed ID: 22689274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Unilateral placement of the Adiana device after failed bilateral placement of the Essure device for hysteroscopic sterilization.
    Gimpelson RJ; Wagner CA
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(5):660-1. PubMed ID: 20728829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Adiana(®) hysteroscopic tubal occlusion device for the treatment of hydrosalpinx prior to in vitro fertilization: a case report].
    Legendre G; Gallot V; Levaillant JM; Capmas P; Fernandez H
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2013 Jun; 42(4):401-4. PubMed ID: 23597488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Transcervical sterilization.
    Castaño PM; Adekunle L
    Semin Reprod Med; 2010 Mar; 28(2):103-9. PubMed ID: 20352559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The safety and effectiveness of a new hysteroscopic method for permanent birth control: results of the first Essure pbc clinical study.
    Kerin JF; Carignan CS; Cher D
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2001 Nov; 41(4):364-70. PubMed ID: 11787907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Case report of failed tubal occlusion using Essure pbc (permanent birth control) hysteroscopic sterilisation procedure.
    Karthigasu KA; Garry R; Hart R
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Aug; 46(4):365-7. PubMed ID: 16866803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effectiveness and feasibility of hysteroscopic sterilization techniques: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    la Chapelle CF; Veersema S; Brölmann HA; Jansen FW
    Fertil Steril; 2015 Jun; 103(6):1516-25.e1-3. PubMed ID: 25910565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Techniques for removal of the Essure hysteroscopic tubal occlusion device.
    Lannon BM; Lee SY
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Aug; 88(2):497.e13-4. PubMed ID: 17397840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A review of clinical data for currently approved hysteroscopic sterilization procedures.
    Basinski CM
    Rev Obstet Gynecol; 2010; 3(3):101-10. PubMed ID: 21364861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Unilateral placement of the Adiana device after failed bilateral placement of the Essure device for hysteroscopic sterilization.
    Levie M
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(2):270-1; author reply 271. PubMed ID: 21354078
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Placement of the Essure permanent birth control device with fluoroscopic guidance: a novel method for tubal sterilization.
    McSwain H; Shaw C; Hall LD
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2005 Jul; 16(7):1007-12. PubMed ID: 16002509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patient Outcomes Following Injury from Hysteroscopic Sterilization.
    Sills ES; Dalton MM
    Surg Technol Int; 2016 Apr; 28():165-9. PubMed ID: 27042777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. One-step transvaginal three-dimensional hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (3D-HyFoSy) confirmation test for Essure® follow-up: a multicenter study.
    Zizolfi B; Lazzeri L; Franchini M; Di Spiezio Sardo A; Nappi C; Piccione E; Exacoustos C
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 51(1):134-141. PubMed ID: 28067009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ultrasound assessment of the Essure contraceptive devices: is three-dimensional ultrasound really needed?
    Paladini D; Di Spiezio Sardo A; Coppola C; Zizolfi B; Pastore G; Nappi C
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015 Jan; 22(1):115-21. PubMed ID: 25241073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Office ultrasound should be the first-line investigation for confirmation of correct ESSURE placement.
    Weston G; Bowditch J
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Aug; 45(4):312-5. PubMed ID: 16029299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intraoperative Factors that Predict the Successful Placement of Essure Microinserts.
    Arthuis CJ; Simon EG; Hébert T; Marret H
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(5):803-810. PubMed ID: 28390945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of tubal patency after essure placement.
    Rodriguez AM; Kilic GS; Vu TP; Kuo YF; Breitkopf D; Snyder RR
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(4):468-72. PubMed ID: 23541247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hysteroscopy and contraception.
    Veersema S
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2015 Oct; 29(7):940-50. PubMed ID: 26013880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Placement of a permanent birth control device at a university medical center.
    Shavell VI; Abdallah ME; Diamond MP; Berman JM
    J Reprod Med; 2009 Apr; 54(4):218-22. PubMed ID: 19438163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pre-hysterectomy assessment of immediate tubal occlusion with the third-generation ESSURE insert (ESS505).
    Thiel J; Rattray D; Cher DJ
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(6):1055-60. PubMed ID: 24861649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.