These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
26. Mesio-occlusodistal amalgam restorations: quantitative in vivo data up to 4 years. A data base for the development of amalgam substitutes. Lutz F; Krejci I Quintessence Int; 1994 Mar; 25(3):185-90. PubMed ID: 8008818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Filling therapy with special reference to experimental studies on model-cast inlays]. Sobkowiak EM; Beetke E; Gressmann G; Hensel K Stomatol DDR; 1976 Nov; 26(11):725-9. PubMed ID: 1070188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. An in vitro load evaluation of a conical implant system with 2 abutment designs and 3 different retaining-screw alloys. Erneklint C; Odman P; Ortengren U; Karlsson S Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):733-7. PubMed ID: 17066634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Modern alternatives to amalgam: cementable restorations and inlays. Wirz J; Jaeger K Quintessence Int; 1999 Aug; 30(8):551-6. PubMed ID: 10635268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evaluation of a technique alloy for use in teaching intracoronal cast gold procedures. Franco SJ; Kelsey WP J Dent Educ; 1980 Nov; 44(11):642-4. PubMed ID: 6107311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The influence of dental alloys on three-body wear of human enamel and dentin in an inlay-like situation. Graf K; Johnson GH; Mehl A; Rammelsberg P Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 11931136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Margin quality of titanium and high-gold inlays and onlays--a clinical study. Wolf BH; Walter MH; Boening KW; Schmidt AE Dent Mater; 1998 Sep; 14(5):370-4. PubMed ID: 10379269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Gold loss in preparation of MOD-inlays]. Behnke HW Quintessenz Zahntech; 1976 Mar; 2(3):81-7. PubMed ID: 1076648 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Influence of superstructure materials on strain around an implant under 2 loading conditions: a technical investigation. Stegaroiu R; Khraisat A; Nomura S; Miyakawa O Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(5):735-42. PubMed ID: 15508991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The resistance to deformation forces of endodontic posts manufactured from six different materials. Blignaut JB; Grobler SR J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1995 Aug; 50(8):363-6. PubMed ID: 8613589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Conservative indirect restorations for posterior teeth. Cast versus bonded ceramic. Donovan TE; Chee WW Dent Clin North Am; 1993 Jul; 37(3):433-43. PubMed ID: 8348996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of the biocompatibility of various dental alloys: Part I--Toxic potentials. Kansu G; Aydin AK Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1996 Sep; 4(3):129-36. PubMed ID: 9171019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Study on elastic limit and relevant enclasp force of non-precious metal casting clasp]. Cheng H; Zheng M; Wu WQ; Huang ZY; Li XR; Cheng XR Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2004 May; 39(3):227-9. PubMed ID: 15196393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Three-dimensional analysis of the casting accuracy of one-piece, osseointegrated implant-retained prostheses. Tan KB; Rubenstein JE; Nicholls JI; Yuodelis RA Int J Prosthodont; 1993; 6(4):346-63. PubMed ID: 8240646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Effect of "cavity varnishes" and "cavity liners" on the retention of reconstructions in gold and in silver amalgam]. Polcan M; Porri A Rass Int Stomatol Prat; 1969; 20(6):409-11. PubMed ID: 5264250 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]