BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22690683)

  • 1. Identifying multiple-target ligands via computational chemogenomics approaches.
    Peng S; Lin X; Guo Z; Huang N
    Curr Top Med Chem; 2012; 12(12):1363-75. PubMed ID: 22690683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A chemogenomics view on protein-ligand spaces.
    Strömbergsson H; Kleywegt GJ
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Jun; 10 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):S13. PubMed ID: 19534738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Development of antituberculous drugs: current status and future prospects].
    Tomioka H; Namba K
    Kekkaku; 2006 Dec; 81(12):753-74. PubMed ID: 17240921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Drug design of GPCR ligands using physicogenetics and chemogenomics--principles and case studies.
    Frimurer TM; Högberg T
    Curr Top Med Chem; 2011; 11(15):1882-901. PubMed ID: 21470174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In Silico Chemogenomics Drug Repositioning Strategies for Neglected Tropical Diseases.
    Andrade CH; Neves BJ; Melo-Filho CC; Rodrigues J; Silva DC; Braga RC; Cravo PVL
    Curr Med Chem; 2019; 26(23):4355-4379. PubMed ID: 29521204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Editorial: Current status and perspective on drug targets in tubercle bacilli and drug design of antituberculous agents based on structure-activity relationship.
    Tomioka H
    Curr Pharm Des; 2014; 20(27):4305-6. PubMed ID: 24245755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Review on chemogenomics approach: interpreting antagonist activity of secreted frizzled-related protein 1 in glaucoma disease with in-silico docking.
    Dave K; Panchal H
    Curr Top Med Chem; 2012; 12(16):1834-42. PubMed ID: 23030617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Protein-ligand-based pharmacophores: generation and utility assessment in computational ligand profiling.
    Meslamani J; Li J; Sutter J; Stevens A; Bertrand HO; Rognan D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Apr; 52(4):943-55. PubMed ID: 22480372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Structural Framework for GPCR Chemogenomics: What's In a Residue Number?
    Vass M; Kooistra AJ; Verhoeven S; Gloriam D; de Esch IJP; de Graaf C
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1705():73-113. PubMed ID: 29188559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Chemogenomic approaches to rational drug design.
    Rognan D
    Br J Pharmacol; 2007 Sep; 152(1):38-52. PubMed ID: 17533416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Recent Advances in the System Biology-based Target Identification and Drug Discovery.
    Yadav BS; Tripathi V
    Curr Top Med Chem; 2018; 18(20):1737-1744. PubMed ID: 30360719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Polypharmacological Drug-target Inference for Chemogenomics.
    Schneider P; Schneider G
    Mol Inform; 2018 Sep; 37(9-10):e1800050. PubMed ID: 29797496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Chemogenomics approaches for receptor deorphanization and extensions of the chemogenomics concept to phenotypic space.
    van der Horst E; Peironcely JE; van Westen GJ; van den Hoven OO; Galloway WR; Spring DR; Wegner JK; van Vlijmen HW; Ijzerman AP; Overington JP; Bender A
    Curr Top Med Chem; 2011; 11(15):1964-77. PubMed ID: 21470175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Structure-Based Approaches to Target Fishing and Ligand Profiling.
    Rognan D
    Mol Inform; 2010 Mar; 29(3):176-87. PubMed ID: 27462761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assay Related Target Similarity (ARTS) - chemogenomics approach for quantitative comparison of biological targets.
    Bieler M; Heilker R; Köppen H; Schneider G
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Aug; 51(8):1897-905. PubMed ID: 21761911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantitative chemogenomics: machine-learning models of protein-ligand interaction.
    Andersson CR; Gustafsson MG; Strömbergsson H
    Curr Top Med Chem; 2011; 11(15):1978-93. PubMed ID: 21470169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Can We Rely on Computational Predictions To Correctly Identify Ligand Binding Sites on Novel Protein Drug Targets? Assessment of Binding Site Prediction Methods and a Protocol for Validation of Predicted Binding Sites.
    Broomhead NK; Soliman ME
    Cell Biochem Biophys; 2017 Mar; 75(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 27796788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Chemogenomics knowledge-based strategies in drug discovery.
    Jacoby E; Schuffenhauer A; Floersheim P
    Drug News Perspect; 2003 Mar; 16(2):93-102. PubMed ID: 12792670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Active learning for computational chemogenomics.
    Reker D; Schneider P; Schneider G; Brown JB
    Future Med Chem; 2017 Mar; 9(4):381-402. PubMed ID: 28263088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Computational chemistry in structure-based drug design].
    Cao R; Li W; Sun HZ; Zhou Y; Huang N
    Yao Xue Xue Bao; 2013 Jul; 48(7):1041-52. PubMed ID: 24133970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.