These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2269071)

  • 1. [Experimental studies on the reproducible precision of fit of ceramic inlays].
    Hahn R
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1990 Oct; 45(10):653-6. PubMed ID: 2269071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interfacial gaps following ceramic inlay cementation vs direct composites.
    Iida K; Inokoshi S; Kurosaki N
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(4):445-52. PubMed ID: 12877431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Where is the gap? Machinable ceramic systems and conventional laboratory restorations at a glance.
    Siervo S; Pampalone A; Siervo P; Siervo R
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Nov; 25(11):773-9. PubMed ID: 7568682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Wear of CAD/CAM ceramic inlays: restorations, opposing cusps, and luting cements.
    Krejci I; Lutz F; Reimer M
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Mar; 25(3):199-207. PubMed ID: 8008821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A randomized 5-year clinical evaluation of 3 ceramic inlay systems.
    Molin MK; Karlsson SL
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):194-200. PubMed ID: 11203631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Marginal fit of ceramic and composite inlays in vitro].
    Reich E; Schmalz G; Federlin M
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1990 Oct; 45(10):656-60. PubMed ID: 2269072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The influence of cavity preparation on the width of marginal gaps in Cerec inlays].
    Hickel R; Kunzelmann KH
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1990 Oct; 45(10):675-7. PubMed ID: 2269078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of fit and microleakage in ceramic restorations.
    Cesar PF; Braga RR; Miranda WG; Romão W
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2005; 17(1):53-4. PubMed ID: 15822482
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vitro evaluation of marginal fit and morphology of fired ceramic inlays.
    Dietschi D; Maeder M; Holz J
    Quintessence Int; 1992 Apr; 23(4):271-8. PubMed ID: 1502303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Scanning electron microscope evaluation of CEREC II and CEREC III inlays.
    Estafan D; Dussetschleger F; Agosta C; Reich S
    Gen Dent; 2003; 51(5):450-4. PubMed ID: 15055635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Conservative indirect restorations for posterior teeth. Cast versus bonded ceramic.
    Donovan TE; Chee WW
    Dent Clin North Am; 1993 Jul; 37(3):433-43. PubMed ID: 8348996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Margin gap size of ceramic inlays using second-generation CAD/CAM equipment.
    Sturdevant JR; Bayne SC; Heymann HO
    J Esthet Dent; 1999; 11(4):206-14. PubMed ID: 10825877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [CAD/CAM-copings for partial coverage].
    Denissen HW; van der Zel JM; van Waas MA
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1999 Feb; 106(2):38-41. PubMed ID: 11930340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Studies on the composite joint in Cerec inlays].
    Rose D; Platzer U; Roth KK
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1990 Oct; 45(10):677-9. PubMed ID: 2269079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Luting composite thickness of two ceramic inlay systems.
    Sertgöz A; Gemalmaz D; Alkumru H; Yoruç B
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1995 Jun; 3(4):151-4. PubMed ID: 8601157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fracture resistance of all-ceramic and metal-ceramic inlays.
    Esquivel-Upshaw JF; Anusavice KJ; Yang MC; Lee RB
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 11843445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A 3-year study of inlays milled from machinable ceramic blocks representing 2 different inlay systems.
    Thordrup M; Isidor F; Hörsted-Bindslev P
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Dec; 30(12):829-36. PubMed ID: 10765860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Marginal fit and short-term clinical performance of porcelain-veneered CICERO, CEREC, and Procera onlays.
    Denissen H; Dozić A; van der Zel J; van Waas M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Nov; 84(5):506-13. PubMed ID: 11105006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical evaluation of marginal fit of a new experimental all-ceramic system before and after cementation.
    Wolfart S; Wegner SM; Al-Halabi A; Kern M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(6):587-92. PubMed ID: 14714835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Two ceramic materials compared for the production of CEREC inlays.
    Shearer AC; Heymann HO; Wilson NH
    J Dent; 1993 Oct; 21(5):302-4. PubMed ID: 8227693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.