These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
53 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2269093)
1. [Evaluation of the new radiovisiography system]. Benz C; Schwarz P; Sonnabend E Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1990 Nov; 45(11):728-9. PubMed ID: 2269093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Comparative study of very high speed dental films]. Benz C Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1989 Sep; 44(9):728-30. PubMed ID: 2637857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of a new dental X-ray film, Agfa Gevaert Dentus M4, with Kodak Ektaspeed and Ultraspeed dental X-ray films. Svenson B; Lindvall AM; Gröndahl HG Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Feb; 22(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 8508944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [RadioVisioGraphie--system for film-free intraoral radiographs]. Benz C; Mouyen F Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1989 Mar; 44(3):177-9. PubMed ID: 2639030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Analysis of variations of exposure and development times of Kodak (Ektaspeed) and Agfa-Gevaert (Dentus M-2) periapical films]. de Pinho MB; Tavano O; Lopes ES Rev Odontol Univ Sao Paulo; 1987; 1(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 3507982 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Densitometric evaluation of four rapid dental film processing solutions. Matthee MJ; Seeliger JE J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1991 Sep; 46(9):467-9. PubMed ID: 1820681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the new RadioVisioGraphy system image quality. Benz C; Mouyen F Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Nov; 72(5):627-31. PubMed ID: 1745524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimated skin exposure as an indicator for comparing radiovisiography (RVG) versus conventional Ektaspeed Plus dental radiography. Jones GA; Schuman NJ; Woods MA J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1998; 22(2):121-3. PubMed ID: 9643185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Preparing dental radiographs without film. Radiovisiography]. Katona M; Körtvélyesi A Fogorv Sz; 1992 Aug; 85(8):249-52. PubMed ID: 1303885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sensitometric evaluation of four dental X-ray films using five processing solutions. Syriopoulos K; Velders XL; Sanderink GC; van Ginkel FC; van der Stelt PF Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Mar; 28(2):73-9. PubMed ID: 10522195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radiation dosage reduction in general dental practice using digital intraoral radiographic systems. Hayakawa Y; Shibuya H; Ota Y; Kuroyanagi K Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1997 Feb; 38(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 9566150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [A new processing system for periapical radiographic films]. Sampaio Lopes E; Tavano O RGO; 1987; 35(3):229-31. PubMed ID: 3507766 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Interpretation of periapical lesions using RadioVisioGraphy. Yokota ET; Miles DA; Newton CW; Brown CE J Endod; 1994 Oct; 20(10):490-4. PubMed ID: 7714421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Objective and subjective assessments of Kodak Ektaspeed plus new dental X-ray film: a comparison with other conventional X-ray films. Kitagawa H; Farman AG; Wakoh M; Nishikawa K; Kuroyanagi K Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1995 May; 36(2):61-7. PubMed ID: 8689744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Densitometric evaluation of seven dental film processing solutions. Matthee MJ; Seeliger JE J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1990 Feb; 45(2):31-3. PubMed ID: 2385845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]