These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2269098)

  • 21. Management of extensive carious lesions in permanent molars of a child with nonmetallic bonded restorations--a case report.
    el-Mowafy O
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2000 Jun; 66(6):302-7. PubMed ID: 10927895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effectiveness of ART and traditional amalgam approach in restoring single-surface cavities in posterior teeth of permanent dentitions in school children after 6.3 years.
    Frencken JE; van't Hof MA; Taifour D; Al-Zaher I
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2007 Jun; 35(3):207-14. PubMed ID: 17518967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Decisions of practitioners regarding placement of amalgam and composite restorations in general practice settings.
    Pink FE; Minden NJ; Simmonds S
    Oper Dent; 1994; 19(4):127-32. PubMed ID: 9028231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Clinical evaluation of a compomer and an amalgam primary teeth class II restorations: a 2-year comparative study.
    Kavvadia K; Kakaboura A; Vanderas AP; Papagiannoulis L
    Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 15185806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The prevalence of proximal fractures of dental crowns with amalgam fillings.
    Pandurić V; Mrakutić M; Tarle Z; Katanec D; Prskalo K; Janković B; Pandurić DG
    Coll Antropol; 2009 Jun; 33(2):449-53. PubMed ID: 19662762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Preventive resin restorations vs. amalgam restorations: a three-year clinical study.
    Cloyd S; Gilpatrick RO; Moore D
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 1997 Oct; 77(4):36-40. PubMed ID: 9520761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Marginal fit of restorations and its relation to peridontal bone level. I. Metal fillings.
    Björn AL; Björn H; Grkovic B
    Odontol Revy; 1969; 20(3):311-21. PubMed ID: 5262284
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Multilevel modelling of clustered grouped survival data using Cox regression model: an application to ART dental restorations.
    Wong MC; Lam KF; Lo EC
    Stat Med; 2006 Feb; 25(3):447-57. PubMed ID: 16143989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Five-year clinical performance of posterior resin composite restorations placed by dental students.
    Opdam NJ; Loomans BA; Roeters FJ; Bronkhorst EM
    J Dent; 2004 Jul; 32(5):379-83. PubMed ID: 15193786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Stainless steel crown versus multisurface amalgam restorations: an 8-year longitudinal clinical study.
    Einwag J; Dünninger P
    Quintessence Int; 1996 May; 27(5):321-3. PubMed ID: 8941814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Long-term survival of extensive amalgam restorations].
    Plasmans PJ; Creugers NH; Mulder J
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2000 Jun; 107(6):233-7. PubMed ID: 11385803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Anaerobic microflora under Class I and Class II composite and amalgam restorations.
    Splieth C; Bernhardt O; Heinrich A; Bernhardt H; Meyer G
    Quintessence Int; 2003; 34(7):497-503. PubMed ID: 12946067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Analysis of an administrative database of indirect restorations over 11 years.
    Lucarotti PS; Burke FJ
    J Dent; 2009 Jan; 37(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 18550255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Clinical evaluation of amalgam restorations for Class I cavities and Class II. Part II: Cause analysis of unacceptable restorations].
    Weiland M; Nossek H; Schulz P
    Stomatol DDR; 1989 Jan; 39(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 2623712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Multilevel survival analysis of amalgam restorations amongst RAF personnel.
    Gilthorpe MS; Mayhew MT; Bulman JS
    Community Dent Health; 2002 Mar; 19(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 11922409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Survival analysis of posterior restorations using an insurance claims database.
    Bogacki RE; Hunt RJ; del Aguila M; Smith WR
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):488-92. PubMed ID: 12216568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Factors associated with postoperative sensitivity of amalgam restorations.
    Al-Omari QD; Al-Omari WM; Omar R
    J Ir Dent Assoc; 2009; 55(2):87-91. PubMed ID: 19455848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Fracture strength of amalgam crowns with repaired endodontic access.
    Hachmeister KA; Dunn WJ; Murchison DF; Larsen RB
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(3):254-8. PubMed ID: 12022456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Failure rates of restorative procedures following dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia.
    Tate AR; Ng MW; Needleman HL; Acs G
    Pediatr Dent; 2002; 24(1):69-71. PubMed ID: 11874065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Failure-time and risk analysis of fixed partial dentures].
    Kerschbaum T; Paszyna C; Klapp S; Meyer G
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1991 Jan; 46(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 1811963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.