These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2269098)
21. Management of extensive carious lesions in permanent molars of a child with nonmetallic bonded restorations--a case report. el-Mowafy O J Can Dent Assoc; 2000 Jun; 66(6):302-7. PubMed ID: 10927895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effectiveness of ART and traditional amalgam approach in restoring single-surface cavities in posterior teeth of permanent dentitions in school children after 6.3 years. Frencken JE; van't Hof MA; Taifour D; Al-Zaher I Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2007 Jun; 35(3):207-14. PubMed ID: 17518967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Decisions of practitioners regarding placement of amalgam and composite restorations in general practice settings. Pink FE; Minden NJ; Simmonds S Oper Dent; 1994; 19(4):127-32. PubMed ID: 9028231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Clinical evaluation of a compomer and an amalgam primary teeth class II restorations: a 2-year comparative study. Kavvadia K; Kakaboura A; Vanderas AP; Papagiannoulis L Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 15185806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The prevalence of proximal fractures of dental crowns with amalgam fillings. Pandurić V; Mrakutić M; Tarle Z; Katanec D; Prskalo K; Janković B; Pandurić DG Coll Antropol; 2009 Jun; 33(2):449-53. PubMed ID: 19662762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Preventive resin restorations vs. amalgam restorations: a three-year clinical study. Cloyd S; Gilpatrick RO; Moore D J Tenn Dent Assoc; 1997 Oct; 77(4):36-40. PubMed ID: 9520761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Marginal fit of restorations and its relation to peridontal bone level. I. Metal fillings. Björn AL; Björn H; Grkovic B Odontol Revy; 1969; 20(3):311-21. PubMed ID: 5262284 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Multilevel modelling of clustered grouped survival data using Cox regression model: an application to ART dental restorations. Wong MC; Lam KF; Lo EC Stat Med; 2006 Feb; 25(3):447-57. PubMed ID: 16143989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Anaerobic microflora under Class I and Class II composite and amalgam restorations. Splieth C; Bernhardt O; Heinrich A; Bernhardt H; Meyer G Quintessence Int; 2003; 34(7):497-503. PubMed ID: 12946067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Analysis of an administrative database of indirect restorations over 11 years. Lucarotti PS; Burke FJ J Dent; 2009 Jan; 37(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 18550255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Clinical evaluation of amalgam restorations for Class I cavities and Class II. Part II: Cause analysis of unacceptable restorations]. Weiland M; Nossek H; Schulz P Stomatol DDR; 1989 Jan; 39(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 2623712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]