These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22691082)

  • 1. Ultrasonic margin preparation for fixed prosthodontics: a pilot study.
    Horne P; Bennani V; Chandler N; Purton D
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2012 Jun; 24(3):201-9. PubMed ID: 22691082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of ultrasonic instruments on the quality of preparation margins and bonding to dentin.
    Ellis R; Bennani V; Purton D; Chandler N; Lowe B
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2012 Aug; 24(4):278-85. PubMed ID: 22863135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of dental rotary instruments on the roughness and wettability of human dentin surfaces.
    Ayad MF; Johnston WM; Rosenstiel SF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Aug; 102(2):81-8. PubMed ID: 19643221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Analysis of retention of 3 different aesthetic Co-Cr-Mo alloy clasps on premolars].
    Hou YF; Bian HQ; Zhang L; Sun Z
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2016 Jun; 25(3):288-91. PubMed ID: 27609379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of oscillating and rotary cutting instruments with electric and turbine handpieces on tooth preparation surfaces.
    Geminiani A; Abdel-Azim T; Ercoli C; Feng C; Meirelles L; Massironi D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jul; 112(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 24726596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of marginal fit between all-porcelain margin versus alumina-supported margin on Procera Alumina crowns.
    Limkangwalmongkol P; Kee E; Chiche GJ; Blatz MB
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):162-6. PubMed ID: 19178619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of tooth preparation burs and luting cement types on the marginal fit of extracoronal restorations.
    Ayad MF
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):145-51. PubMed ID: 19054303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Study of surface topography, roughness, and microleakage after dental preparation with different instrumentation.
    Solá-Ruiz MF; Faus-Matoses I; Del Rio Highsmith J; Fons-Font A
    Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(6):530-3. PubMed ID: 25390866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Oscillating procedures in the preparation technic (I)].
    Hugo B
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1999; 109(2):140-60. PubMed ID: 10078043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Precision of fit of two margin designs for metal-ceramic crowns.
    Limkangwalmongkol P; Chiche GJ; Blatz MB
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):233-7. PubMed ID: 17451481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical acceptability of crown margins versus marginal gaps as determined by pre-doctoral students and prosthodontists.
    Bronson MR; Lindquist TJ; Dawson DV
    J Prosthodont; 2005 Dec; 14(4):226-32. PubMed ID: 16359478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nondestructive, in vitro quantification of crown margins.
    Mitchell CA; Pintado MR; Douglas WH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jun; 85(6):575-84. PubMed ID: 11404758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Evaluation of the effect of using ultrasonic instruments to improve the shoulder of the preparations].
    Li SY; Duan XF; Cao Y
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Dec; 53(1):88-94. PubMed ID: 33550341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Marginal fit of porcelain-fused-to-metal crowns: a comparative study of metal and porcelain butt margin].
    Berksun S; Alkumru HN; Ozden N
    Ankara Univ Hekim Fak Derg; 1989 Sep; 16(3):393-7. PubMed ID: 2489487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Marginal adaptation of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM composite crowns using two different finish line preparation designs.
    Akbar JH; Petrie CS; Walker MP; Williams K; Eick JD
    J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(3):155-63. PubMed ID: 16681497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vitro comparison of the cutting efficiency and temperature production of ten different rotary cutting instruments. Part II: electric handpiece and comparison with turbine.
    Ercoli C; Rotella M; Funkenbusch PD; Russell S; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 May; 101(5):319-31. PubMed ID: 19410066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A retrospective analysis of 102 zirconia single crowns with knife-edge margins.
    Poggio CE; Dosoli R; Ercoli C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 May; 107(5):316-21. PubMed ID: 22546309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Commentary. Ultrasonic margin preparation for fixed prosthodontics: a pilot study.
    Reshad M
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2012 Jun; 24(3):210. PubMed ID: 22691083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Surface roughness of tooth shoulder preparations created by rotary instrumentation, hand planing, and ultrasonic oscillation.
    Laufer BZ; Pilo R; Cardash HS
    J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Jan; 75(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 8850446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ultrasonic sulcus penetration: a new approach for full crown preparations.
    Sous M; Lepetitcorps Y; Lasserre JF; Six N
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2009 Jun; 29(3):277-87. PubMed ID: 19537467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.