265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22692386)
1. Nomogram for predicting positive resection margins after breast-conserving surgery.
Shin HC; Han W; Moon HG; Cho N; Moon WK; Park IA; Park SJ; Noh DY
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Aug; 134(3):1115-23. PubMed ID: 22692386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. External validation and modification of nomogram for predicting positive resection margins before breast conserving surgery.
Jung JJ; Kang E; Kim EK; Kim SM; Jang M; La Yun B; Park SY; Shin HC
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Sep; 183(2):373-380. PubMed ID: 32647937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A validated web-based nomogram for predicting positive surgical margins following breast-conserving surgery as a preoperative tool for clinical decision-making.
Pleijhuis RG; Kwast AB; Jansen L; de Vries J; Lanting R; Bart J; Wiggers T; van Dam GM; Siesling S
Breast; 2013 Oct; 22(5):773-9. PubMed ID: 23462681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predictors of surgical margin status in breast-conserving surgery within a breast screening program.
Kurniawan ED; Wong MH; Windle I; Rose A; Mou A; Buchanan M; Collins JP; Miller JA; Gruen RL; Mann GB
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Sep; 15(9):2542-9. PubMed ID: 18618180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Role for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery.
Cabioglu N; Hunt KK; Sahin AA; Kuerer HM; Babiera GV; Singletary SE; Whitman GJ; Ross MI; Ames FC; Feig BW; Buchholz TA; Meric-Bernstam F
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Apr; 14(4):1458-71. PubMed ID: 17260108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effects of additional tumor cavity sampling at the time of breast-conserving surgery on final margin status, volume of resection, and pathologist workload.
Rizzo M; Iyengar R; Gabram SG; Park J; Birdsong G; Chandler KL; Mosunjac MB
Ann Surg Oncol; 2010 Jan; 17(1):228-34. PubMed ID: 19636625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The role of reexcision for positive margins in optimizing local disease control after breast-conserving surgery for cancer.
Aziz D; Rawlinson E; Narod SA; Sun P; Lickley HL; McCready DR; Holloway CM
Breast J; 2006; 12(4):331-7. PubMed ID: 16848842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prediction of positive margins following breast conserving surgery.
Agostinho JL; Zhao X; Sun W; Laronga C; Kiluk JV; Chen DT; Lee MC
Breast; 2015 Feb; 24(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 25466503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of intraoperative gross examination of surgical margin status in women undergoing partial mastectomy for breast malignancy.
Balch GC; Mithani SK; Simpson JF; Kelley MC
Am Surg; 2005 Jan; 71(1):22-7; discussion 27-8. PubMed ID: 15757052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ultrasonography- and/or mammography-guided breast conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: experience with 87 lesions.
Hayashi N; Tsunoda H; Abe E; Kikuchi M; Enokido K; Tsugawa K; Suzuki K; Nakamura S
Breast Cancer; 2012 Apr; 19(2):131-7. PubMed ID: 20725871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Feasibility of breast-conserving surgery for patients with breast carcinoma associated with nipple discharge.
Cabioglu N; Krishnamurthy S; Kuerer HM; Hunt KK; Singletary SE; Meric-Bernstam F; Ross MI; Feig BW; Ames FC; Babiera GV
Cancer; 2004 Aug; 101(3):508-17. PubMed ID: 15274063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Limited value and utility of breast MRI in patients undergoing breast-conserving cancer surgery.
Shin HC; Han W; Moon HG; Yom CK; Ahn SK; You JM; Kim JS; Chang JM; Cho N; Moon WK; Park IA; Noh DY
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Aug; 19(8):2572-9. PubMed ID: 22446897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predictors of re-excision among women undergoing breast-conserving surgery for cancer.
Waljee JF; Hu ES; Newman LA; Alderman AK
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 May; 15(5):1297-303. PubMed ID: 18259820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intra-operative touch preparation cytology; does it have a role in re-excision lumpectomy?
Valdes EK; Boolbol SK; Cohen JM; Feldman SM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1045-50. PubMed ID: 17206481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Frozen section analysis for intraoperative margin assessment during breast-conserving surgery results in low rates of re-excision and local recurrence.
Olson TP; Harter J; Muñoz A; Mahvi DM; Breslin T
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 14(10):2953-60. PubMed ID: 17674109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. CIH-Tokyo experience with breast-conserving surgery without radiotherapy: 6.5 year follow-up results of 1462 patients.
Kasumi F; Takahashi K; Nishimura S; Iijima K; Miyagi U; Tada K; Makita M; Iwase T; Oguchi M; Yamashita T; Akiyama F; Sakamoto G
Breast J; 2006; 12(5 Suppl 2):S181-90. PubMed ID: 16958999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Oncologic and aesthetic results following breast-conserving therapy with 0.5 cm margins in 100 consecutive patients.
Fedorcik GG; Sachs R; Goldfarb MA
Breast J; 2006; 12(3):208-11. PubMed ID: 16684317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ductal carcinoma in situ: size and resection volume predict margin status.
Melstrom LG; Melstrom KA; Wang EC; Pilewskie M; Winchester DJ
Am J Clin Oncol; 2010 Oct; 33(5):438-42. PubMed ID: 20023569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Preoperative breast MRI can reduce the rate of tumor-positive resection margins and reoperations in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery.
Obdeijn IM; Tilanus-Linthorst MM; Spronk S; van Deurzen CH; de Monye C; Hunink MG; Menke MB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Feb; 200(2):304-10. PubMed ID: 23345350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Nomogram for predicting invasion in patients with a preoperative diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.
Lee SK; Yang JH; Woo SY; Lee JE; Nam SJ
Br J Surg; 2013 Dec; 100(13):1756-63. PubMed ID: 24227361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
