These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22693435)

  • 1. Accessible high-throughput virtual screening molecular docking software for students and educators.
    Jacob RB; Andersen T; McDougal OM
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2012 May; 8(5):e1002499. PubMed ID: 22693435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. DockoMatic 2.0: high throughput inverse virtual screening and homology modeling.
    Bullock C; Cornia N; Jacob R; Remm A; Peavey T; Weekes K; Mallory C; Oxford JT; McDougal OM; Andersen TL
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Aug; 53(8):2161-70. PubMed ID: 23808933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. InstaDock: A single-click graphical user interface for molecular docking-based virtual high-throughput screening.
    Mohammad T; Mathur Y; Hassan MI
    Brief Bioinform; 2021 Jul; 22(4):. PubMed ID: 33105480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. BDT: an easy-to-use front-end application for automation of massive docking tasks and complex docking strategies with AutoDock.
    Vaqué M; Arola A; Aliagas C; Pujadas G
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Jul; 22(14):1803-4. PubMed ID: 16720587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. DOVIS: an implementation for high-throughput virtual screening using AutoDock.
    Zhang S; Kumar K; Jiang X; Wallqvist A; Reifman J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Feb; 9():126. PubMed ID: 18304355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. High throughput virtual screening (HTVS) of peptide library: Technological advancement in ligand discovery.
    Tripathi NM; Bandyopadhyay A
    Eur J Med Chem; 2022 Dec; 243():114766. PubMed ID: 36122548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computational exploration of a protein receptor binding space with student proposed peptide ligands.
    King MD; Phillips P; Turner MW; Katz M; Lew S; Bradburn S; Andersen T; McDougal OM
    Biochem Mol Biol Educ; 2016; 44(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 26537635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. DiSCuS: an open platform for (not only) virtual screening results management.
    Wójcikowski M; Zielenkiewicz P; Siedlecki P
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jan; 54(1):347-54. PubMed ID: 24364790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Toward fully automated high performance computing drug discovery: a massively parallel virtual screening pipeline for docking and molecular mechanics/generalized Born surface area rescoring to improve enrichment.
    Zhang X; Wong SE; Lightstone FC
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jan; 54(1):324-37. PubMed ID: 24358939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [DockingServer: molecular docking calculations online].
    Hazai E; Kovács S; Demkó L; Bikádi Z
    Acta Pharm Hung; 2009; 79(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 19526678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dockomatic - automated ligand creation and docking.
    Bullock CW; Jacob RB; McDougal OM; Hampikian G; Andersen T
    BMC Res Notes; 2010 Nov; 3():289. PubMed ID: 21059259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. DockoMatic: automated peptide analog creation for high throughput virtual screening.
    Jacob RB; Bullock CW; Andersen T; McDougal OM
    J Comput Chem; 2011 Oct; 32(13):2936-41. PubMed ID: 21717479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. DockingApp: a user friendly interface for facilitated docking simulations with AutoDock Vina.
    Di Muzio E; Toti D; Polticelli F
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Feb; 31(2):213-218. PubMed ID: 28063067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Structure-Based Virtual Screening.
    Li Q; Shah S
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1558():111-124. PubMed ID: 28150235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. DockingApp RF: A State-of-the-Art Novel Scoring Function for Molecular Docking in a User-Friendly Interface to AutoDock Vina.
    Macari G; Toti D; Pasquadibisceglie A; Polticelli F
    Int J Mol Sci; 2020 Dec; 21(24):. PubMed ID: 33333976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of several molecular docking programs: pose prediction and virtual screening accuracy.
    Cross JB; Thompson DC; Rai BK; Baber JC; Fan KY; Hu Y; Humblet C
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jun; 49(6):1455-74. PubMed ID: 19476350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computational protein-ligand docking and virtual drug screening with the AutoDock suite.
    Forli S; Huey R; Pique ME; Sanner MF; Goodsell DS; Olson AJ
    Nat Protoc; 2016 May; 11(5):905-19. PubMed ID: 27077332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. AutoDock and AutoDockTools for Protein-Ligand Docking: Beta-Site Amyloid Precursor Protein Cleaving Enzyme 1(BACE1) as a Case Study.
    El-Hachem N; Haibe-Kains B; Khalil A; Kobeissy FH; Nemer G
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1598():391-403. PubMed ID: 28508374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using AutoDock for ligand-receptor docking.
    Morris GM; Huey R; Olson AJ
    Curr Protoc Bioinformatics; 2008 Dec; Chapter 8():Unit 8.14. PubMed ID: 19085980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is It Reliable to Use Common Molecular Docking Methods for Comparing the Binding Affinities of Enantiomer Pairs for Their Protein Target?
    Ramírez D; Caballero J
    Int J Mol Sci; 2016 Apr; 17(4):. PubMed ID: 27104528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.