188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22693994)
1. Court-ordered care--a complication of pregnancy to avoid.
Cantor JD
N Engl J Med; 2012 Jun; 366(24):2237-40. PubMed ID: 22693994
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A Violent Birth: Reframing Coerced Procedures During Childbirth as Obstetric Violence.
Borges MT
Duke Law J; 2018 Jan; 67(4):827-62. PubMed ID: 29469554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The constitutionality of court imposed contraception as a condition of probation.
Mubaraki M
Crim Justice J; 1992; 14(2):385-405. PubMed ID: 16700114
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Whose rights supersede, those of the patient or those of the unborn fetus?
Cady RF
JONAS Healthc Law Ethics Regul; 1999 Mar; 1(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 10823985
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Who gets to choose? Responses to the foetal/maternal conflict.
Hyams R
E Law; 1995 Dec; 2(3):E7. PubMed ID: 16969923
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Contraception or incarceration: what's wrong with this picture?
Callahan J
Stanford Law Pol Rev; 1995-1996 Winter; 7(1):67-82. PubMed ID: 16086509
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Emerging notions of women's rights and responsibilities during gestation.
Blank RH
J Leg Med; 1986 Dec; 7(4):441-69. PubMed ID: 3492583
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Women's rights versus the protection of fetuses.
Warren MA
Midwest Med Ethics; 1991; 7(1):1, 3-7. PubMed ID: 16145788
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Abortion 1990s: contemporary issues and the activist court.
Bertz RC
West State Univ Law Rev; 1992; 19(2):393-429. PubMed ID: 16047452
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The Canadian Charter as a barrier to unwanted medical treatment of pregnant women in the interests of the foetus.
Jackman M
Health Law Can; 1993; 14(2):49-58. PubMed ID: 10131254
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. State v. Oakley: infringing on women's reproductive rights.
Schehr AR
Wis Womens Law J; 2003; 18(2):281-97. PubMed ID: 15568247
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Burton v. Florida: Maternal-fetal conflicts and medical decision-making during pregnancy.
Wevers K
J Law Med Ethics; 2010; 38(2):436-40. PubMed ID: 20579240
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Court-ordered obstetrical interventions.
N Engl J Med; 1987 Nov; 317(19):1223-5. PubMed ID: 3657894
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Prenatal v. parental rights: what a difference an "a" makes.
Gallagher A
St Marys Law J; 1989; 21(2):301-24. PubMed ID: 16100799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Court-ordered obstetrical intervention and the rights of a pregnant woman.
Thampapillai D
J Law Med; 2005 May; 12(4):455-61. PubMed ID: 15957588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. When pregnant patients refuse interventions.
Tauer CA
AWHONNS Clin Issues Perinat Womens Health Nurs; 1993; 4(4):596-605. PubMed ID: 8220374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The free exercise rights of pregnant women who refuse medical treatment.
Cherry AL
Tenn Law Rev; 2002; 69(3):563-622. PubMed ID: 15378820
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Pregnant embodiment and women's autonomy rights in law: an analysis of the language and politics of Winnipeg Child and Family Services v. D.F.G.
Randall M
Sask Law Rev; 1999; 62(2):515-42. PubMed ID: 12769105
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Reply to Sarah Burns.
Colker R
Harv Womens Law J; 1990; 13():207-14. PubMed ID: 16032808
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. An Orwellian scenario: court ordered caesarean section and women's autonomy.
Cahill H
Nurs Ethics; 1999 Nov; 6(6):494-505. PubMed ID: 10696195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
