These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Human rights, reproductive freedom, medicine and the law. McLean SA; Ramsey J Med Law Int; 2002; 5(4):239-58. PubMed ID: 14983883 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. What are the legal rights of the unborn child? Vernon J Neonatal Netw; 1997 Jun; 16(4):73-4. PubMed ID: 9216327 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. A jailed expectant mom--and a case of tangled rights. Axtman K Christ Sci Monitor (East Ed); 2000 Sep; 92(202):2. PubMed ID: 15586931 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Compelling pregnancy at death's door. Taylor KA Columbia J Gend Law; 1997; 7(1):85-165. PubMed ID: 16184655 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Constitutionalizing Roe, Casey and Carhart: a legislative due-process anti-discrimination principle that gives constitutional content to the "undue burden" standard of review applied to abortion control legislation. Van Detta JA South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 2001; 10(2):211-92. PubMed ID: 16485363 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Abortion and human rights. Rendel M New Law J; 1991 Sep; 141(6520):1270-1. PubMed ID: 16145806 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Obstetricians, health attorneys, and court-ordered cesarean sections. Samuels TA; Minkoff H; Feldman J; Awonuga A; Wilson TE Womens Health Issues; 2007; 17(2):107-14. PubMed ID: 17403468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Mother v fetus: who wins? Newnham H Aust J Midwifery; 2003 Mar; 16(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 12858480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A woman's right to choose: wrongful death statutes and abortion rights--consistent at last. Siano JR Womens Rights Law Report; 1998; 19(3):279-92. PubMed ID: 15871153 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. An upside-down world? Hewson B Mod Midwife; 1997 May; 7(5):18-9. PubMed ID: 9224034 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The right to privacy: Roe v. Wade revisited. Smith PA Jurist; 1983; 43(2):289-317. PubMed ID: 16086474 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. The maternal-fetal rights dilemma: honoring a woman's choice of medical care during pregnancy. Arch RR J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1996; 12(2):637-73. PubMed ID: 8666737 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The rhetoric of disrespect: uncovering the faulty premises infecting reproductive rights. Reilly EA Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 1996; 5(1):147-205. PubMed ID: 16594108 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Future fear: prenatal duties imposed by private parties. Solomon RI Am J Law Med; 1991; 17(4):411-34. PubMed ID: 1812768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The social meaning of the Norplant condition: constitutional considerations of race, class, and gender. Albiston C Berkeley Womens Law J; 1994; 9():9-57. PubMed ID: 16767841 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Abortion and maternal-fetal conflict: broadening our concerns. Shultz MM South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 1992; 1():79-98. PubMed ID: 16437820 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. AMWA position statement on abortion and reproductive rights. Devi G; Glodowski M; Shin E J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2009 Mar; 18(3):299-300. PubMed ID: 19281313 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Symposium: A Celebration of Reproductive Rights: Twenty-Five Years of Roe v. Wade. Perry T; Garcia MT; Baird B; Frietsche S Womens Rights Law Report; 1998; 19(3):247-59. PubMed ID: 15871152 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]