191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22694040)
1. Increasing cesarean rates: the balance of technology, autonomy, and beneficence.
Shah KR
Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(7):58-9. PubMed ID: 22694040
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Reproductive autonomy and normalization of cesarean section.
Tsu PS
Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(7):61-2. PubMed ID: 22694042
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Relational autonomy on the cutting edge.
Berkhout S
Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(7):59-61. PubMed ID: 22694041
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Where are the midwives?
Rothman BK
Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(7):56-8. PubMed ID: 22694039
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The importance of risk tolerance in maternal autonomy.
Kapfhamer JD; Menon S; Spellecy R
Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(7):53-4. PubMed ID: 22694037
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The professional responsibility model of respect for autonomy in decision making about cesarean delivery.
Chervenak FA; McCullough LB
Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(7):1-2. PubMed ID: 22694022
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Beyond numbers: the multiple cultural meanings of rising cesarean rates worldwide.
Orfali K
Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(7):54-6. PubMed ID: 22694038
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. On the cutting edge: ethical responsiveness to cesarean rates.
Burrow S
Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(7):44-52. PubMed ID: 22694036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The professional responsibility model of obstetric ethics and caesarean delivery.
Chervenak FA; McCullough LB
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2013 Apr; 27(2):153-64. PubMed ID: 23059404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cesarean section without clinical indication versus vaginal delivery as a paradigmatic model in the discourse of medical setting decisions.
Demontis R; Pisu S; Pintor M; D'aloja E
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2011 Dec; 24(12):1470-5. PubMed ID: 21158491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Unacceptable risk in pregnancy: whose choice and responsibility?
Perry C
Am J Bioeth; 2011 May; 11(5):64-5. PubMed ID: 21534159
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Hippocratic ideal, Faustian bargain and Damocles' sword: erosion of patient autonomy in obstetrics.
Rybak EA
J Perinatol; 2009 Nov; 29(11):721-5. PubMed ID: 19861969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. FOR: Responding professionally to requests for non-indicated caesarean delivery.
Chervenak F; McCullough LB
BJOG; 2015 Feb; 122(3):360. PubMed ID: 25623572
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Respect for rational autonomy.
Walker RL
Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2009 Dec; 19(4):339-66. PubMed ID: 20191948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. "Lethal" Fetal Anomalies and Elective Cesarean.
Hastings Cent Rep; 2015; 45(6):13. PubMed ID: 26556142
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. ACOG committee opinion. Surgery and patient choice: the ethics of decision making. Number 289, November 2003.
ACOG Committee on Ethics
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2004 Feb; 84(2):188-93. PubMed ID: 14997900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cesarean delivery on maternal request: can the ethical problem be solved by the principlist approach?
Nilstun T; Habiba M; Lingman G; Saracci R; Da Frè M; Cuttini M;
BMC Med Ethics; 2008 Jun; 9():11. PubMed ID: 18559083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The American Association for Thoracic Surgery 2016 ethics forum: Preoperative disclosure: In all honesty, my results….
Starnes SL
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2017 May; 153(5):1209-1211. PubMed ID: 27964985
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Maternal request caesarean section: maternal vs medical autonomy.
Esen UI; Archibong EI
Br J Hosp Med (Lond); 2007 Nov; 68(11):610-1. PubMed ID: 18087854
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Avoiding paternalism but not moral perplexity.
Hall DR
S Afr Med J; 2018 Oct; 108(11):915-916. PubMed ID: 30645955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]