190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22694042)
21. "Lethal" Fetal Anomalies and Elective Cesarean.
Hastings Cent Rep; 2015; 45(6):13. PubMed ID: 26556142
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Moral implications of obstetric technologies for pregnancy and motherhood.
Brauer S
Med Health Care Philos; 2016 Mar; 19(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 25837233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Female autonomy and elective abdominal delivery.
de Roubaix M
S Afr Med J; 2005 Jul; 95(7):452. PubMed ID: 16156429
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Cesarean section by choice: constructing a reproductive rights framework for the debate.
Christilaw JE
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2006 Sep; 94(3):262-8. PubMed ID: 16842789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Defensive practice is indefensible: how defensive medicine runs counter to the ethical and professional obligations of clinicians.
Bester JC
Med Health Care Philos; 2020 Sep; 23(3):413-420. PubMed ID: 32303983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Cesarean delivery on maternal request: can the ethical problem be solved by the principlist approach?
Nilstun T; Habiba M; Lingman G; Saracci R; Da Frè M; Cuttini M;
BMC Med Ethics; 2008 Jun; 9():11. PubMed ID: 18559083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The unlimited-rights model of obstetric ethics threatens professionalism.
Chervenak FA; McCullough LB
BJOG; 2017 Jul; 124(8):1144-1147. PubMed ID: 28127900
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. [Cesarean section on request].
Schulte-Wissermann H
Kinderkrankenschwester; 2012 Nov; 31(11):446. PubMed ID: 23256410
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Women's autonomy and scheduled cesarean sections in Brazil: a cautionary tale.
Potter JE; Hopkins K; Faúndes A; Perpétuo I
Birth; 2008 Mar; 35(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 18307486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Patient choice cesarean delivery: ethical issues.
Kalish RB; McCullough LB; Chervenak FA
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Apr; 20(2):116-9. PubMed ID: 18388809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Finding autonomy in birth.
; Kukla R; Kuppermann M; Little M; Lyerly AD; Mitchell LM; Armstrong EM; Harris L
Bioethics; 2009 Jan; 23(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 19076937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Impersonalism in bioethics.
Ranisch R
Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(8):40-1. PubMed ID: 22852544
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. A sufficient limit to "reasonable" choices.
DeCamp M
Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(8):36-8. PubMed ID: 22852542
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. The ethics of cesarean section by choice.
Minkoff H
Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):309-12. PubMed ID: 17011404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Advantageous interventions: will someone be healed?
Zohar N
Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(8):32-3. PubMed ID: 22852540
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. The ethics of vaginal birth after cesarean.
Charles S
Hastings Cent Rep; 2012; 42(4):24-7. PubMed ID: 22777976
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Maimonides and the ethics of patient autonomy.
Collins K
Isr Med Assoc J; 2007 Jan; 9(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 17274363
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The right not to be born: reinterpreting the nonidentity problem.
Jecker NS
Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(8):34-5. PubMed ID: 22852541
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Selecting for disability: acceptable lives, acceptable reasons.
Wasserman D; Asch A
Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(8):30-1. PubMed ID: 22852539
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Avoiding paternalism but not moral perplexity.
Hall DR
S Afr Med J; 2018 Oct; 108(11):915-916. PubMed ID: 30645955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
