These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22694202)

  • 41. Breast cancer screening controversies: who, when, why, and how?
    Chetlen A; Mack J; Chan T
    Clin Imaging; 2016; 40(2):279-82. PubMed ID: 26093511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. 1000-Case Reader Study of Radiologists' Performance in Interpretation of Automated Breast Volume Scanner Images with a Computer-Aided Detection System.
    Xu X; Bao L; Tan Y; Zhu L; Kong F; Wang W
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2018 Aug; 44(8):1694-1702. PubMed ID: 29853222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Diffuse pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia of the breast: a case report and a review of the radiological characteristics.
    Mai C; Rombaut B; Hertveldt K; Claikens B; Van Wettere P
    JBR-BTR; 2014; 97(2):81-3. PubMed ID: 25073236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Computed-aided diagnosis (CAD) in the detection of breast cancer.
    Dromain C; Boyer B; Ferré R; Canale S; Delaloge S; Balleyguier C
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Mar; 82(3):417-23. PubMed ID: 22939365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Overview of digital breast tomosynthesis: Clinical cases, benefits and disadvantages.
    Nguyen T; Levy G; Poncelet E; Le Thanh T; Prolongeau JF; Phalippou J; Massoni F; Laurent N
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2015 Sep; 96(9):843-59. PubMed ID: 26275829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Combining CRF and multi-hypothesis detection for accurate lesion segmentation in breast sonograms.
    Hao Z; Wang Q; Seong YK; Lee JH; Ren H; Kim JY
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2012; 15(Pt 1):504-11. PubMed ID: 23285589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Interpretation of automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) with and without knowledge of mammography: a reader performance study.
    Skaane P; Gullien R; Eben EB; Sandhaug M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Stoeblen F
    Acta Radiol; 2015 Apr; 56(4):404-12. PubMed ID: 24682405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Contrast-enhanced dual-energy mammography: a promising new imaging tool in breast cancer detection.
    Lalji U; Lobbes M
    Womens Health (Lond); 2014 May; 10(3):289-98. PubMed ID: 24956295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Combination of digital mammography with semi-automated 3D breast ultrasound.
    Kapur A; Carson PL; Eberhard J; Goodsitt MM; Thomenius K; Lokhandwalla M; Buckley D; Roubidoux MA; Helvie MA; Booi RC; LeCarpentier GL; Erkamp RQ; Chan HP; Fowlkes JB; Thomas J; Landberg C
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2004 Aug; 3(4):325-34. PubMed ID: 15270583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. How to optimize breast ultrasound.
    Athanasiou A; Tardivon A; Ollivier L; Thibault F; El Khoury C; Neuenschwander S
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jan; 69(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 18818037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Overview of Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis.
    Lebron-Zapata L; Jochelson MS
    PET Clin; 2018 Jul; 13(3):301-323. PubMed ID: 30100072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Deformable mapping technique to correlate lesions in digital breast tomosynthesis and automated breast ultrasound images.
    Green CA; Goodsitt MM; Brock KK; Davis CL; Larson ED; Lau JH; Carson PL
    Med Phys; 2018 Oct; 45(10):4402-4417. PubMed ID: 30066340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Breast cancer staging: Combined digital breast tomosynthesis and automated breast ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging.
    Girometti R; Tomkova L; Cereser L; Zuiani C
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Oct; 107():188-195. PubMed ID: 30292265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Breast MRI, digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis: comparison of three methods for early detection of breast cancer.
    Roganovic D; Djilas D; Vujnovic S; Pavic D; Stojanov D
    Bosn J Basic Med Sci; 2015 Nov; 15(4):64-8. PubMed ID: 26614855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Preliminary in vivo validation of a dedicated breast MRI and sonographic coregistration imaging system.
    Causer PA; Piron CA; Jong RA; Plewes DB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Oct; 191(4):1203-7. PubMed ID: 18806166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Imaging of the breast.
    Birjawi G; El Zein Y
    J Med Liban; 2009; 57(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 19459577
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Second-look ultrasound: only for biopsy or more?
    Leung JW
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S87-9. PubMed ID: 23083617
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Computer-aided diagnosis based on quantitative elastographic features with supersonic shear wave imaging.
    Xiao Y; Zeng J; Niu L; Zeng Q; Wu T; Wang C; Zheng R; Zheng H
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Feb; 40(2):275-86. PubMed ID: 24268454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [New developments in breast imaging].
    Tardivon A; el Khoury C; Thibault F; Meunier M
    Cancer Radiother; 2004 Feb; 8(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 15093195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Kinetic characterization of non-mass lesions on breast MRI using manual and computer assisted methods.
    Vag T; Baltzer PA; Dietzel M; Kaiser WA
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S177-8. PubMed ID: 23083580
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.