These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22695007)

  • 1. Endotracheal intubation using the C-MAC® video laryngoscope or the Macintosh laryngoscope: a prospective, comparative study in the ICU.
    Noppens RR; Geimer S; Eisel N; David M; Piepho T
    Crit Care; 2012 Jun; 16(3):R103. PubMed ID: 22695007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improvement in glottic visualisation by using the C-MAC PM video laryngoscope as a first-line device for out-of-hospital emergency tracheal intubation: An observational study.
    Hossfeld B; Frey K; Doerges V; Lampl L; Helm M
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2015 Jun; 32(6):425-31. PubMed ID: 25886716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of the C-MAC video laryngoscope to the Macintosh direct laryngoscope for intubation in the emergency department.
    Sakles JC; Mosier J; Chiu S; Cosentino M; Kalin L
    Ann Emerg Med; 2012 Dec; 60(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 22560464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A randomized controlled comparison of non-channeled king vision, McGrath MAC video laryngoscope and Macintosh direct laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation in patients with predicted difficult intubations.
    Zhu H; Liu J; Suo L; Zhou C; Sun Y; Jiang H
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2019 Aug; 19(1):166. PubMed ID: 31470814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intubation in the Intensive Care Unit: C-MAC video laryngoscope versus Macintosh laryngoscope.
    Dey S; Pradhan D; Saikia P; Bhattacharyya P; Khandelwal H; Adarsha KN
    Med Intensiva (Engl Ed); 2020 Apr; 44(3):135-141. PubMed ID: 31780257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative effectiveness of the C-MAC video laryngoscope versus direct laryngoscopy in the setting of the predicted difficult airway.
    Aziz MF; Dillman D; Fu R; Brambrink AM
    Anesthesiology; 2012 Mar; 116(3):629-36. PubMed ID: 22261795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Direct laryngoscopy or C-MAC video laryngoscopy? Routine tracheal intubation in patients undergoing ENT surgery].
    Meininger D; Strouhal U; Weber CF; Fogl D; Holzer L; Zacharowski K; Byhahn C
    Anaesthesist; 2010 Sep; 59(9):806-11. PubMed ID: 20703441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the McGrath MAC and Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in 2000 patients undergoing general anaesthesia: the randomised multicentre EMMA trial study protocol.
    Kriege M; Alflen C; Tzanova I; Schmidtmann I; Piepho T; Noppens RR
    BMJ Open; 2017 Aug; 7(8):e016907. PubMed ID: 28827261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of three video laryngoscopes and direct laryngoscopy for emergency endotracheal intubation: a retrospective cohort study.
    Suzuki K; Kusunoki S; Tanigawa K; Shime N
    BMJ Open; 2019 Mar; 9(3):e024927. PubMed ID: 30928937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative Evaluation of McGrath MAC, Truview Video Laryngoscopes and Macintosh Laryngoscope for Endotracheal Intubation in Patients Undergoing Surgery under General Anaesthesia.
    Kaur G; Gupta S; Mehta N; Dhingra JS
    Anesth Essays Res; 2020; 14(1):20-24. PubMed ID: 32843786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Success rates and endotracheal tube insertion times of experienced emergency physicians using five video laryngoscopes: a randomised trial in a simulated trapped car accident victim.
    Wetsch WA; Carlitscheck M; Spelten O; Teschendorf P; Hellmich M; Genzwürker HV; Hinkelbein J
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2011 Dec; 28(12):849-58. PubMed ID: 21986981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The usefulness of the McGrath MAC laryngoscope in comparison with Airwayscope and Macintosh laryngoscope during routine nasotracheal intubation: a randomaized controlled trial.
    Sato Boku A; Sobue K; Kako E; Tachi N; Okumura Y; Kanazawa M; Hashimoto M; Harada J
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):160. PubMed ID: 29191160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prospective model-based comparison of different laryngoscopes for difficult intubation in infants.
    Kalbhenn J; Boelke AK; Steinmann D
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2012 Aug; 22(8):776-80. PubMed ID: 22646973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. GlideScope® versus C-MAC®(D) videolaryngoscope versus Macintosh laryngoscope for double lumen endotracheal intubation in patients with predicted normal airways: a randomized, controlled, prospective trial.
    Huang P; Zhou R; Lu Z; Hang Y; Wang S; Huang Z
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2020 May; 20(1):119. PubMed ID: 32434470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of the storz video Macintosh laryngoscope for use in difficult airways: A human simulator study.
    Bair AE; Olmsted K; Brown CA; Barker T; Pallin D; Walls RM
    Acad Emerg Med; 2010 Oct; 17(10):1134-7. PubMed ID: 21064263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A deliberately restricted laryngeal view with the GlideScope® video laryngoscope is associated with faster and easier tracheal intubation when compared with a full glottic view: a randomized clinical trial.
    Gu Y; Robert J; Kovacs G; Milne AD; Morris I; Hung O; MacQuarrie K; Mackinnon S; Adam Law J
    Can J Anaesth; 2016 Aug; 63(8):928-37. PubMed ID: 27090535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Macintosh laryngoscope blade for videolaryngoscopy reduces stylet use in patients with normal airways.
    van Zundert A; Maassen R; Lee R; Willems R; Timmerman M; Siemonsma M; Buise M; Wiepking M
    Anesth Analg; 2009 Sep; 109(3):825-31. PubMed ID: 19690253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improved glottic exposure with the Video Macintosh Laryngoscope in adult emergency department tracheal intubations.
    Brown CA; Bair AE; Pallin DJ; Laurin EG; Walls RM;
    Ann Emerg Med; 2010 Aug; 56(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 20202720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of three video laryngoscopy devices to direct laryngoscopy for intubating obese patients: a randomized controlled trial.
    Yumul R; Elvir-Lazo OL; White PF; Sloninsky A; Kaplan M; Kariger R; Naruse R; Parker N; Pham C; Zhang X; Wender RH
    J Clin Anesth; 2016 Jun; 31():71-7. PubMed ID: 27185681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. C-MAC videolaryngoscope compared with direct laryngoscopy for rapid sequence intubation in an emergency department: A randomised clinical trial.
    Sulser S; Ubmann D; Schlaepfer M; Brueesch M; Goliasch G; Seifert B; Spahn DR; Ruetzler K
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2016 Dec; 33(12):943-948. PubMed ID: 27533711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.