These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

371 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22695083)

  • 1. Recovery of information from multiple imputation: a simulation study.
    Lee KJ; Carlin JB
    Emerg Themes Epidemiol; 2012 Jun; 9(1):3. PubMed ID: 22695083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of multiple imputation methods for handling missing values in longitudinal data in the presence of a time-varying covariate with a non-linear association with time: a simulation study.
    De Silva AP; Moreno-Betancur M; De Livera AM; Lee KJ; Simpson JA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Jul; 17(1):114. PubMed ID: 28743256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of multiple imputation approaches for handling missing covariate information in a case-cohort study with a binary outcome.
    Middleton M; Nguyen C; Moreno-Betancur M; Carlin JB; Lee KJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Apr; 22(1):87. PubMed ID: 35369860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of techniques for handling missing covariate data within prognostic modelling studies: a simulation study.
    Marshall A; Altman DG; Royston P; Holder RL
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 Jan; 10():7. PubMed ID: 20085642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multiple imputation for handling missing outcome data when estimating the relative risk.
    Sullivan TR; Lee KJ; Ryan P; Salter AB
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Sep; 17(1):134. PubMed ID: 28877666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dealing with missing delirium assessments in prospective clinical studies of the critically ill: a simulation study and reanalysis of two delirium studies.
    Raman R; Chen W; Harhay MO; Thompson JL; Ely EW; Pandharipande PP; Patel MB
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 May; 21(1):97. PubMed ID: 33952189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Outcome-sensitive multiple imputation: a simulation study.
    Kontopantelis E; White IR; Sperrin M; Buchan I
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Jan; 17(1):2. PubMed ID: 28068910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Imputation strategies when a continuous outcome is to be dichotomized for responder analysis: a simulation study.
    Floden L; Bell ML
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):161. PubMed ID: 31345166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multiple imputation with missing indicators as proxies for unmeasured variables: simulation study.
    Sperrin M; Martin GP
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jul; 20(1):185. PubMed ID: 32640992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of imputation methods for handling missing covariate data when fitting a Cox proportional hazards model: a resampling study.
    Marshall A; Altman DG; Holder RL
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 Dec; 10():112. PubMed ID: 21194416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance of Multiple Imputation Using Modern Machine Learning Methods in Electronic Health Records Data.
    Getz K; Hubbard RA; Linn KA
    Epidemiology; 2023 Mar; 34(2):206-215. PubMed ID: 36722803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of different methods to handle missing data in the context of propensity score analysis.
    Choi J; Dekkers OM; le Cessie S
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2019 Jan; 34(1):23-36. PubMed ID: 30341708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multiple imputation for missing data: fully conditional specification versus multivariate normal imputation.
    Lee KJ; Carlin JB
    Am J Epidemiol; 2010 Mar; 171(5):624-32. PubMed ID: 20106935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Missing continuous outcomes under covariate dependent missingness in cluster randomised trials.
    Hossain A; Diaz-Ordaz K; Bartlett JW
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Jun; 26(3):1543-1562. PubMed ID: 27177885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bias and Precision of the "Multiple Imputation, Then Deletion" Method for Dealing With Missing Outcome Data.
    Sullivan TR; Salter AB; Ryan P; Lee KJ
    Am J Epidemiol; 2015 Sep; 182(6):528-34. PubMed ID: 26337075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Propensity score analysis with partially observed covariates: How should multiple imputation be used?
    Leyrat C; Seaman SR; White IR; Douglas I; Smeeth L; Kim J; Resche-Rigon M; Carpenter JR; Williamson EJ
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Jan; 28(1):3-19. PubMed ID: 28573919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Explicating the Conditions Under Which Multilevel Multiple Imputation Mitigates Bias Resulting from Random Coefficient-Dependent Missing Longitudinal Data.
    Gottfredson NC; Sterba SK; Jackson KM
    Prev Sci; 2017 Jan; 18(1):12-19. PubMed ID: 27866307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dealing with missing outcome data in randomized trials and observational studies.
    Groenwold RH; Donders AR; Roes KC; Harrell FE; Moons KG
    Am J Epidemiol; 2012 Feb; 175(3):210-7. PubMed ID: 22262640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is using multiple imputation better than complete case analysis for estimating a prevalence (risk) difference in randomized controlled trials when binary outcome observations are missing?
    Mukaka M; White SA; Terlouw DJ; Mwapasa V; Kalilani-Phiri L; Faragher EB
    Trials; 2016 Jul; 17():341. PubMed ID: 27450066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of methods for handling covariate missingness in propensity score estimation with a binary exposure.
    Coffman DL; Zhou J; Cai X
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):168. PubMed ID: 32586271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.