314 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22695205)
1. Diagnostic yield of malignancy during EUS-guided FNA of solid lesions with and without a stylet: a prospective, single blind, randomized, controlled trial.
Wani S; Early D; Kunkel J; Leathersich A; Hovis CE; Hollander TG; Kohlmeier C; Zelenka C; Azar R; Edmundowicz S; Collins B; Liu J; Hall M; Mullady D
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Aug; 76(2):328-35. PubMed ID: 22695205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A prospective, single-blind, randomized, controlled trial of EUS-guided FNA with and without a stylet.
Rastogi A; Wani S; Gupta N; Singh V; Gaddam S; Reddymasu S; Ulusarac O; Fan F; Romanas M; Dennis KL; Sharma P; Bansal A; Oropeza-Vail M; Olyaee M
Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Jul; 74(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 21514932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of a stylet on a histological specimen in EUS-guided fine-needle tissue acquisition by using 22-gauge needles: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial.
Abe Y; Kawakami H; Oba K; Hayashi T; Yasuda I; Mukai T; Isayama H; Ishiwatari H; Doi S; Nakashima M; Yamamoto N; Kuwatani M; Mitsuhashi T; Hasegawa T; Hirose Y; Yamada T; Tanaka M; Sakamoto N;
Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Nov; 82(5):837-844.e1. PubMed ID: 25936452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparative study of endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration with and without a stylet.
Wani S; Gupta N; Gaddam S; Singh V; Ulusarac O; Romanas M; Bansal A; Sharma P; Olyaee MS; Rastogi A
Dig Dis Sci; 2011 Aug; 56(8):2409-14. PubMed ID: 21327919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. High single-pass diagnostic yield of a new 25-gauge core biopsy needle for EUS-guided FNA biopsy in solid pancreatic lesions.
Iwashita T; Nakai Y; Samarasena JB; Park DH; Zhang Z; Gu M; Lee JG; Chang KJ
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jun; 77(6):909-15. PubMed ID: 23433596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. High and low negative pressure suction techniques in EUS-guided fine-needle tissue acquisition by using 25-gauge needles: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial.
Kudo T; Kawakami H; Hayashi T; Yasuda I; Mukai T; Inoue H; Katanuma A; Kawakubo K; Ishiwatari H; Doi S; Yamada R; Maguchi H; Isayama H; Mitsuhashi T; Sakamoto N;
Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Dec; 80(6):1030-7.e1. PubMed ID: 24890422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology results with and without the stylet in 3364 cases.
Gimeno-García AZ; Paquin SC; Gariépy G; Sosa AJ; Sahai AV
Dig Endosc; 2013 May; 25(3):303-7. PubMed ID: 23368962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The clinical impact of immediate on-site cytopathology evaluation during endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic masses: a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial.
Wani S; Mullady D; Early DS; Rastogi A; Collins B; Wang JF; Marshall C; Sams SB; Yen R; Rizeq M; Romanas M; Ulusarac O; Brauer B; Attwell A; Gaddam S; Hollander TG; Hosford L; Johnson S; Kushnir V; Amateau SK; Kohlmeier C; Azar RR; Vargo J; Fukami N; Shah RJ; Das A; Edmundowicz SA
Am J Gastroenterol; 2015 Oct; 110(10):1429-39. PubMed ID: 26346868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles.
Yang MJ; Yim H; Hwang JC; Lee D; Kim YB; Lim SG; Kim SS; Kang JK; Yoo BM; Kim JH
BMC Gastroenterol; 2015 Sep; 15():122. PubMed ID: 26419845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Touch imprint cytology on endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle biopsy provides comparable sample quality and diagnostic yield to standard endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration specimens in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions.
Crinò SF; Larghi A; Bernardoni L; Parisi A; Frulloni L; Gabbrielli A; Parcesepe P; Scarpa A; Manfrin E
Cytopathology; 2019 Mar; 30(2):179-186. PubMed ID: 30484917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Randomized controlled trial comparing stylet-free endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration with 22-G and 25-G needles.
Gimeno-García AZ; Elwassief A; Paquin SC; Gariépy G; Sahai AV
Dig Endosc; 2014 May; 26(3):467-73. PubMed ID: 24877242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Conventional versus contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions: A prospective randomized trial.
Sugimoto M; Takagi T; Hikichi T; Suzuki R; Watanabe K; Nakamura J; Kikuchi H; Konno N; Waragai Y; Watanabe H; Obara K; Ohira H
Pancreatology; 2015; 15(5):538-541. PubMed ID: 26145837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparing endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine needle biopsy (FNB) in the diagnosis of solid lesions: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Wang J; Wu X; Yin P; Guo Q; Hou W; Li Y; Wang Y; Cheng B
Trials; 2016 Apr; 17():198. PubMed ID: 27071386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Core biopsy needle versus standard aspiration needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized parallel-group study.
Lee YN; Moon JH; Kim HK; Choi HJ; Choi MH; Kim DC; Lee TH; Cha SW; Cho YD; Park SH
Endoscopy; 2014 Dec; 46(12):1056-62. PubMed ID: 25098611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Macroscopic on-site quality evaluation of biopsy specimens to improve the diagnostic accuracy during EUS-guided FNA using a 19-gauge needle for solid lesions: a single-center prospective pilot study (MOSE study).
Iwashita T; Yasuda I; Mukai T; Doi S; Nakashima M; Uemura S; Mabuchi M; Shimizu M; Hatano Y; Hara A; Moriwaki H
Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Jan; 81(1):177-85. PubMed ID: 25440688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. "Wet suction technique (WEST)": a novel way to enhance the quality of EUS-FNA aspirate. Results of a prospective, single-blind, randomized, controlled trial using a 22-gauge needle for EUS-FNA of solid lesions.
Attam R; Arain MA; Bloechl SJ; Trikudanathan G; Munigala S; Bakman Y; Singh M; Wallace T; Henderson JB; Catalano MF; Guda NM
Gastrointest Endosc; 2015; 81(6):1401-7. PubMed ID: 25733127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reliability of gross visual assessment of specimen adequacy during EUS-guided FNA of pancreatic masses.
Nguyen YP; Maple JT; Zhang Q; Ylagan LR; Zhai J; Kohlmeier C; Jonnalagadda S; Early DS; Edmundowicz SA; Azar RR
Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 Jun; 69(7):1264-70. PubMed ID: 19243768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Rapid on-site evaluation during endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of lymph nodes does not increase diagnostic yield: A randomized, multicenter trial.
Kappelle WFW; Van Leerdam ME; Schwartz MP; Bülbül M; Buikhuisen WA; Brink MA; Sie-Go DMDS; Pullens HJM; Nikolakopoulos S; Van Diest PJ; Leenders M; Moons LMG; Bogte A; Siersema PD; Vleggaar FP
Am J Gastroenterol; 2018 May; 113(5):677-685. PubMed ID: 29681624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stylet slow-pull versus standard suction for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid pancreatic lesions: a multicenter randomized trial.
Saxena P; El Zein M; Stevens T; Abdelgelil A; Besharati S; Messallam A; Kumbhari V; Azola A; Brainard J; Shin EJ; Lennon AM; Canto MI; Singh VK; Khashab MA
Endoscopy; 2018 May; 50(5):497-504. PubMed ID: 29272906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. EUS-guided fine needle biopsy sampling using a novel fork-tip needle: a case-control study.
Kandel P; Tranesh G; Nassar A; Bingham R; Raimondo M; Woodward TA; Gomez V; Wallace MB
Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Dec; 84(6):1034-1039. PubMed ID: 27018087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
