These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22696688)

  • 1. On cross-odds ratio for multivariate competing risks data.
    Scheike TH; Sun Y
    Biostatistics; 2012 Sep; 13(4):680-94. PubMed ID: 22696688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A semiparametric random effects model for multivariate competing risks data.
    Scheike TH; Sun Y; Zhang MJ; Jensen TK
    Biometrika; 2010 Mar; 97(1):133-145. PubMed ID: 23613620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimating twin concordance for bivariate competing risks twin data.
    Scheike TH; Holst KK; Hjelmborg JB
    Stat Med; 2014 Mar; 33(7):1193-204. PubMed ID: 24132877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimation of time-dependent association for bivariate failure times in the presence of a competing risk.
    Ning J; Bandeen-Roche K
    Biometrics; 2014 Mar; 70(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 24350628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Maximum likelihood estimation of semiparametric mixture component models for competing risks data.
    Choi S; Huang X
    Biometrics; 2014 Sep; 70(3):588-98. PubMed ID: 24734912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Discrete distributions for use in twin studies.
    Yu C; Waller LA; Zelterman D
    Biometrics; 1998 Jun; 54(2):546-57. PubMed ID: 9629643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Semiparametric regression on cumulative incidence function with interval-censored competing risks data.
    Bakoyannis G; Yu M; Yiannoutsos CT
    Stat Med; 2017 Oct; 36(23):3683-3707. PubMed ID: 28608412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Elementary methods for the analysis of dichotomous outcomes in unselected samples of twins.
    Ramakrishnan V; Goldberg J; Henderson WG; Eisen SA; True W; Lyons MJ; Tsuang MT
    Genet Epidemiol; 1992; 9(4):273-87. PubMed ID: 1398046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Semiparametric competing risks regression under interval censoring using the R package intccr.
    Park J; Bakoyannis G; Yiannoutsos CT
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 May; 173():167-176. PubMed ID: 31046992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The proportional odds cumulative incidence model for competing risks.
    Eriksson F; Li J; Scheike T; Zhang MJ
    Biometrics; 2015 Sep; 71(3):687-95. PubMed ID: 26013050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Association measures for clustered competing risks.
    Su CL; Lakhal-Chaieb L
    Stat Med; 2020 Feb; 39(4):409-423. PubMed ID: 31799731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lifespans of Twins: Does Zygosity Matter?
    Hjelmborg J; Larsen P; Kaprio J; McGue M; Scheike T; Hougaard P; Christensen K
    Genes (Basel); 2019 Feb; 10(2):. PubMed ID: 30791679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of Generalized Semiparametric Regression Models for Cumulative Incidence Functions with Missing Covariates.
    Lee U; Sun Y; Scheike TH; Gilbert PB
    Comput Stat Data Anal; 2018 Jun; 122():59-79. PubMed ID: 29892140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genetic and environmental contributions to back pain in old age: a study of 2,108 danish twins aged 70 and older.
    Hartvigsen J; Christensen K; Frederiksen H; Petersen HC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Apr; 29(8):897-901; discussion 902. PubMed ID: 15082992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A computationally simple test of homogeneity of odds ratios for twin data.
    Betensky RA; Hudson JI; Jones CA; Hu F; Wang B; Chen C; Xu X
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Feb; 20(2):228-38. PubMed ID: 11180448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cleft-twin sets in Finland 1948-1987.
    Nordström RE; Laatikainen T; Juvonen TO; Ranta RE
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1996 Jul; 33(4):340-7. PubMed ID: 8827393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of methods for analyzing binary data arising from two-sample twin studies.
    Gao XJ; Klar N; Donner A
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(4):349-63. PubMed ID: 9271709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Semiparametric regression analysis of interval-censored competing risks data.
    Mao L; Lin DY; Zeng D
    Biometrics; 2017 Sep; 73(3):857-865. PubMed ID: 28211951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Semiparametric analysis of mixture regression models with competing risks data.
    Lu W; Peng L
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2008 Sep; 14(3):231-52. PubMed ID: 18193354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A two-stage estimation in the Clayton-Oakes model with marginal linear transformation models for multivariate failure time data.
    Chen CM; Yu CY
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2012 Jan; 18(1):94-115. PubMed ID: 21983914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.