145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22696970)
1. Cost-benefit federalism: reconciling collective action federalism and libertarian federalism in the Obamacare litigation and beyond.
Moncrieff AR
Am J Law Med; 2012; 38(2-3):288-325. PubMed ID: 22696970
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. If we can force people to purchase health insurance, then let's force them to be treated too.
Kapp MB
Am J Law Med; 2012; 38(2-3):397-409. PubMed ID: 22696974
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. State-run insurance exchanges in federal healthcare reform: a case study in dysfunctional federalism.
Thomson K
Am J Law Med; 2012; 38(2-3):548-69. PubMed ID: 22696980
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Affordable Care Act litigation: the standing paradox.
Leonard EW
Am J Law Med; 2012; 38(2-3):410-44. PubMed ID: 22696975
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Health insurance exchanges: benefits to be determined.
Ruffner BW
Tenn Med; 2011 Jan; 104(1):5, 12. PubMed ID: 21314052
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Business of Health: Business of Health Insurance.
Berry MD
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2017 Dec; 2017():1-105. PubMed ID: 29359895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Unraveling Obamacare--can Congress and the Supreme Court undo health care reform?
Oberlander J
N Engl J Med; 2014 Dec; 371(26):2445-7. PubMed ID: 25493977
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Aftermath of the Supreme Court ruling on health reform.
Elwood TW
J Allied Health; 2012; 41(3):99-105. PubMed ID: 22968770
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. From Obamacare to Hillarycare - Democrats' Health Care Reform Agenda.
Oberlander J
N Engl J Med; 2016 Oct; 375(14):1309-1311. PubMed ID: 27627459
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. No healthcare penalty? No problem: no due process.
Willis SJ; Chung N
Am J Law Med; 2012; 38(2-3):516-36. PubMed ID: 22696978
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. What is the meaning of health? Constitutional implications of defining "medical necessity" and "essential health benefits" under the Affordable Care Act.
Hill BJ
Am J Law Med; 2012; 38(2-3):445-70. PubMed ID: 22696976
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A Look at Republican Plans for Repealing and Replacing Obamacare.
Carroll AE
JAMA; 2017 Jan; 317(4):348-349. PubMed ID: 28118441
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Litigating the ACA: securing the right to health within a framework of negative rights.
Record KL
Am J Law Med; 2012; 38(2-3):537-47. PubMed ID: 22696979
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Access to health insurance.
; Gibbons KH
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2012 Jan; ():1-59. PubMed ID: 22403841
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Much Activity, Uncertainty Remains.
Jost TS
Health Aff (Millwood); 2017 Nov; 36(11):1864-1865. PubMed ID: 29018104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The PPACA in wonderland.
Lawson G; Kopel DB
Am J Law Med; 2012; 38(2-3):269-87. PubMed ID: 22696969
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The Mirage of Reform - Republicans' Struggle to Dismantle Obamacare.
Oberlander J
N Engl J Med; 2017 Apr; 376(15):e32. PubMed ID: 28328283
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Health care reform after the ACA.
Antos JR
N Engl J Med; 2014 Jun; 370(24):2259-61. PubMed ID: 24805986
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Constitutional ratemaking and the Affordable Care Act: a new source of vulnerability.
Epstein RA; Stannard PM
Am J Law Med; 2012; 38(2-3):243-68. PubMed ID: 22696968
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Healthcare reform: insurance market reform.
; Gibbons KH
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2012 Jan; ():1-37. PubMed ID: 22403848
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
