These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

292 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22697476)

  • 1. t-tests, non-parametric tests, and large studies--a paradox of statistical practice?
    Fagerland MW
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Jun; 12():78. PubMed ID: 22697476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test under scrutiny.
    Fagerland MW; Sandvik L
    Stat Med; 2009 May; 28(10):1487-97. PubMed ID: 19247980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Confidence intervals of the Mann-Whitney parameter that are compatible with the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test.
    Fay MP; Malinovsky Y
    Stat Med; 2018 Nov; 37(27):3991-4006. PubMed ID: 29984411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Should we always choose a nonparametric test when comparing two apparently nonnormal distributions?
    Skovlund E; Fenstad GU
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2001 Jan; 54(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 11165471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Case for omitting tied observations in the two-sample t-test and the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney Test.
    McGee M
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0200837. PubMed ID: 30040850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of small sample size studies using nonparametric bootstrap test with pooled resampling method.
    Dwivedi AK; Mallawaarachchi I; Alvarado LA
    Stat Med; 2017 Jun; 36(14):2187-2205. PubMed ID: 28276584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Experimental comparison of parametric versus nonparametric analyses of data from the cold pressor test.
    Treister R; Nielsen CS; Stubhaug A; Farrar JT; Pud D; Sawilowsky S; Oaklander AL
    J Pain; 2015 Jun; 16(6):537-48. PubMed ID: 25801300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A note on consistency of non-parametric rank tests and related rank transformations.
    Zimmerman DW
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2012 Feb; 65(1):122-44. PubMed ID: 21518333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test: stratify or not?
    Qu Y; Zhao YD; Rahardja D
    J Biopharm Stat; 2008; 18(6):1103-11. PubMed ID: 18991110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of profile-likelihood-based confidence intervals with other rank-based methods for the two-sample problem in ordered categorical data.
    Funatogawa I; Funatogawa T
    J Biopharm Stat; 2023 May; 33(3):371-385. PubMed ID: 36533908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Parametric methods outperformed non-parametric methods in comparisons of discrete numerical variables.
    Fagerland MW; Sandvik L; Mowinckel P
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 Apr; 11():44. PubMed ID: 21489231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of confidence/credible interval methods for the area under the ROC curve for continuous diagnostic tests with small sample size.
    Feng D; Cortese G; Baumgartner R
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Dec; 26(6):2603-2621. PubMed ID: 26323286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sample size calculations based on a difference in medians for positively skewed outcomes in health care studies.
    O'Keeffe AG; Ambler G; Barber JA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):157. PubMed ID: 29197347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Parametric versus non-parametric statistics in the analysis of randomized trials with non-normally distributed data.
    Vickers AJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Nov; 5():35. PubMed ID: 16269081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Statistical grand rounds: a review of analysis and sample size calculation considerations for Wilcoxon tests.
    Divine G; Norton HJ; Hunt R; Dienemann J
    Anesth Analg; 2013 Sep; 117(3):699-710. PubMed ID: 23456667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Confidence intervals for the Mann-Whitney test.
    Perme MP; Manevski D
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Dec; 28(12):3755-3768. PubMed ID: 30514179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Power comparisons of significance tests of location using scores, ranks, and modular ranks.
    Zimmerman DW
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 May; 64(Pt 2):233-43. PubMed ID: 21492130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Investigation Into the Effects of Using Normal Distribution Theory Methodology for Likert Scale Patient-Reported Outcome Data From Varying Underlying Distributions Including Floor/Ceiling Effects.
    DeWees TA; Mazza GL; Golafshar MA; Dueck AC
    Value Health; 2020 May; 23(5):625-631. PubMed ID: 32389228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Murine genetic models of obesity: type I error rates and the power of commonly used analyses as assessed by plasmode-based simulation.
    Ejima K; Brown AW; Smith DL; Beyaztas U; Allison DB
    Int J Obes (Lond); 2020 Jun; 44(6):1440-1449. PubMed ID: 32099106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Location tests for biomarker studies: a comparison using simulations for the two-sample case.
    Scheinhardt MO; Ziegler A
    Methods Inf Med; 2013; 52(4):351-9. PubMed ID: 23877617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.