These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2269898)

  • 1. A Rehnquistean bed: the abortion issue revisited.
    Maher VF; Badin R
    J N Y State Nurses Assoc; 1990 Dec; 21(4):4-5. PubMed ID: 2269898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Webster versus reproductive health services.
    Rhodes AM
    MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 1989; 14(6):423. PubMed ID: 2514333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Legal aspects of abortion practice.
    Goldman EB
    Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1986 Mar; 13(1):135-43. PubMed ID: 3709009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Brief for 885 law professors in support of maintaining adherence to the Roe decision.
    Michelman FI; Redlich N; Neuwirth SR; Carty-Bennia D
    Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):197-203. PubMed ID: 2603862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis.
    Peterfy A
    J Leg Med; 1995 Dec; 16(4):607-36. PubMed ID: 8568420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Webster and the fundamental right to make medical decisions.
    Orentlicher D
    Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):184-8. PubMed ID: 2603860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Court reaffirms Roe but upholds restrictions.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1992; 24(4):174-7, 185. PubMed ID: 1526274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Abortion: rights or technicalities? A comparison of Roe v. Wade with the abortion decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court.
    Brown HO
    Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(3):60-74. PubMed ID: 11662181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Abortion ethics.
    Fromer MJ
    Nurs Outlook; 1982 Apr; 30(4):234-40. PubMed ID: 7041095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. State legislation on abortion after Roe v. Wade: selected constitutional issues.
    Bryant MD
    Am J Law Med; 1976; 2(1):101-32. PubMed ID: 973625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Roe v. Wade and the history of abortion regulation.
    Linton PB
    Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):227-33. PubMed ID: 2690604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Abortion 1982: the Supreme Court once again.
    Healey JM
    Conn Med; 1982 Nov; 46(11):681. PubMed ID: 7172671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Will Webster redefine Roe v. Wade? The Supreme Court could use a Missouri case to begin limiting abortion rights.
    Chopko ME
    Health Prog; 1989 Jun; 70(5):58-64. PubMed ID: 10293331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Court edges away from Roe v. Wade.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1989; 21(4):184-7. PubMed ID: 2792338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rethinking Roe.
    Scofield GR
    Trends Health Care Law Ethics; 1993; 8(3):17-20, 16. PubMed ID: 8118132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Four-one-four.
    Annas GJ
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(5):27-9. PubMed ID: 2793440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Roe v. Wade and the lesson of the pre-Roe case law.
    Morgan RG
    Mich Law Rev; 1979 Aug; 77(7):1724-48. PubMed ID: 10245969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Casey and the resuscitation of Roe v. Wade.
    Robertson JA
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1992; 22(5):24-8. PubMed ID: 1428831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The concept of wrongful life in the law.
    Kasper AS
    Women Health; 1983; 8(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 6868627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Webster and women's equality.
    Johnsen D; Wilder MJ
    Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):178-84. PubMed ID: 2603859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.