BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

321 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22698994)

  • 41. Impaired decoding of fear and disgust predicts utilitarian moral judgment in alcohol-dependent individuals.
    Carmona-Perera M; Clark L; Young L; Pérez-García M; Verdejo-García A
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2014 Jan; 38(1):179-85. PubMed ID: 24447115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Socio-cognitive conflict, emotions and complexity of thought in real-life morality.
    Myyry L; Helkama K
    Scand J Psychol; 2007 Jun; 48(3):247-59. PubMed ID: 17518917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Not all who ponder count costs: Arithmetic reflection predicts utilitarian tendencies, but logical reflection predicts both deontological and utilitarian tendencies.
    Byrd N; Conway P
    Cognition; 2019 Nov; 192():103995. PubMed ID: 31301587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Derailing the trolley: Everyday utilitarian judgments in groups high versus low in psychopathic traits or autistic traits.
    Vyas K; Jameel L; Bellesi G; Crawford S; Channon S
    Psychiatry Res; 2017 Apr; 250():84-91. PubMed ID: 28152398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. 'Utilitarian' judgments in sacrificial moral dilemmas do not reflect impartial concern for the greater good.
    Kahane G; Everett JA; Earp BD; Farias M; Savulescu J
    Cognition; 2015 Jan; 134():193-209. PubMed ID: 25460392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Virtual morality: emotion and action in a simulated three-dimensional "trolley problem".
    Navarrete CD; McDonald MM; Mott ML; Asher B
    Emotion; 2012 Apr; 12(2):364-70. PubMed ID: 22103331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Switching Away from Utilitarianism: The Limited Role of Utility Calculations in Moral Judgment.
    Sheskin M; Baumard N
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0160084. PubMed ID: 27505424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Principled moral sentiment and the flexibility of moral judgment and decision making.
    Bartels DM
    Cognition; 2008 Aug; 108(2):381-417. PubMed ID: 18486121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Selective impairment of cognitive empathy for moral judgment in adults with high functioning autism.
    Gleichgerrcht E; Torralva T; Rattazzi A; Marenco V; Roca M; Manes F
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2013 Oct; 8(7):780-8. PubMed ID: 22689217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. What makes moral dilemma judgments "utilitarian" or "deontological"?
    Gawronski B; Beer JS
    Soc Neurosci; 2017 Dec; 12(6):626-632. PubMed ID: 27745112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The role of control motivation in mortality salience effects on ingroup support and defense.
    Fritsche I; Jonas E; Fankhänel T
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Sep; 95(3):524-41. PubMed ID: 18729692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Not just bad actions: Affective concern for bad outcomes contributes to moral condemnation of harm in moral dilemmas.
    Reynolds CJ; Conway P
    Emotion; 2018 Oct; 18(7):1009-1023. PubMed ID: 29389202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The contact principle and utilitarian moral judgments in young children.
    Pellizzoni S; Siegal M; Surian L
    Dev Sci; 2010 Mar; 13(2):265-70. PubMed ID: 20136922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Do our moral judgments need to be guided by principles?
    Andorno R
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2012 Oct; 21(4):457-65. PubMed ID: 22828040
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Contingencies of self-worth and the strength of deontological and utilitarian inclinations.
    Macko A
    J Soc Psychol; 2021 Nov; 161(6):664-682. PubMed ID: 33357143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. You see, the ends don't justify the means: visual imagery and moral judgment.
    Amit E; Greene JD
    Psychol Sci; 2012 Aug; 23(8):861-8. PubMed ID: 22745347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Autonomous vehicles: How perspective-taking accessibility alters moral judgments and consumer purchasing behavior.
    Martin R; Kusev P; van Schaik P
    Cognition; 2021 Jul; 212():104666. PubMed ID: 33930784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. When ignorance is no excuse: Different roles for intent across moral domains.
    Young L; Saxe R
    Cognition; 2011 Aug; 120(2):202-14. PubMed ID: 21601839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Awareness to utilitarian responses in later life: An ERP study with moral dilemmas.
    Fernandes C; Pasion R; Gonçalves AR; Almeida R; Garcez H; Ferreira-Santos F; Barbosa F; Marques-Teixeira J
    Neurosci Lett; 2022 Sep; 787():136824. PubMed ID: 35917838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Critical thinking, educational preparation, and development of moral judgment among selected groups of practicing nurses.
    Ketefian S
    Nurs Res; 1981; 30(2):98-103. PubMed ID: 6907870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.