321 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22698994)
61. Focus theory of normative conduct and terror-management theory: the interactive impact of mortality salience and norm salience on social judgment.
Jonas E; Martens A; Kayser DN; Fritsche I; Sullivan D; Greenberg J
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Dec; 95(6):1239-51. PubMed ID: 19025281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Consequences, norms, and generalized inaction in moral dilemmas: The CNI model of moral decision-making.
Gawronski B; Armstrong J; Conway P; Friesdorf R; Hütter M
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2017 Sep; 113(3):343-376. PubMed ID: 28816493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Are older adults more attuned to morally charged information?
Narvaez D; Radvansky GA; Lynchard NA; Copeland DE
Exp Aging Res; 2011 Jul; 37(4):398-434. PubMed ID: 21800972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Who shalt not kill? Individual differences in working memory capacity, executive control, and moral judgment.
Moore AB; Clark BA; Kane MJ
Psychol Sci; 2008 Jun; 19(6):549-57. PubMed ID: 18578844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. More utilitarian judgment in Internet addiction? An exploration using process dissociation and the CNI model.
Lu J; Xie J; Chen J; Zeng Y; Jiang Z; Wang Y; Zheng H
Brain Behav; 2022 Mar; 12(3):e2510. PubMed ID: 35114077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. On the role of attention and emotion in morality: attentional control modulates unrelated disgust in moral judgments.
Van Dillen LF; van der Wal RC; van den Bos K
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2012 Sep; 38(9):1222-31. PubMed ID: 22645165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Efficient Kill-Save Ratios Ease Up the Cognitive Demands on Counterintuitive Moral Utilitarianism.
Trémolière B; Bonnefon JF
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2014 Jul; 40(7):923-930. PubMed ID: 24722872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Correlations of trait and state emotions with utilitarian moral judgements.
Baron J; Gürçay B; Luce MF
Cogn Emot; 2018 Feb; 32(1):116-129. PubMed ID: 28278733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Divergent effects of different positive emotions on moral judgment.
Strohminger N; Lewis RL; Meyer DE
Cognition; 2011 May; 119(2):295-300. PubMed ID: 21255773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Thinking like a scientist: innateness as a case study.
Knobe J; Samuels R
Cognition; 2013 Jan; 126(1):72-86. PubMed ID: 23063235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. A dose of ruthlessness: interpersonal moral judgment is hardened by the anti-anxiety drug lorazepam.
Perkins AM; Leonard AM; Weaver K; Dalton JA; Mehta MA; Kumari V; Williams SC; Ettinger U
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2013 Aug; 142(3):612-20. PubMed ID: 23025561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Why People With High Alexithymia Make More Utilitarian Judgments.
Zhang X; Wu Z; Li S; Lai J; Han M; Chen X; Liu C; Ding D
Exp Psychol; 2020 Jan; 67(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 32520665
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
73. An Asymmetric Effect: Physical and Simulated Confederate's Mere Presence Induce a Preference for Deontological Over Utilitarian Judgment.
Xu W; Yu X; Guo J; Wang R
Psychol Rep; 2023 Oct; 126(5):2446-2464. PubMed ID: 35428414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Creative terror management: creativity as a facilitator of cultural exploration after mortality salience.
Routledge CD; Arndt J
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2009 Apr; 35(4):493-505. PubMed ID: 19139160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. A lack of material resources causes harsher moral judgments.
Pitesa M; Thau S
Psychol Sci; 2014 Mar; 25(3):702-10. PubMed ID: 24434236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Theory of mind and moral cognition: exploring the connections.
Knobe J
Trends Cogn Sci; 2005 Aug; 9(8):357-9. PubMed ID: 16006176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Throwing a bomb on a person versus throwing a person on a bomb: intervention myopia in moral intuitions.
Waldmann MR; Dieterich JH
Psychol Sci; 2007 Mar; 18(3):247-53. PubMed ID: 17444922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. When the killing has been done: Exploring associations of personality with third-party judgment and punishment of homicides in moral dilemma scenarios.
Behnke A; Strobel A; Armbruster D
PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0235253. PubMed ID: 32603338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. The contribution of emotion and cognition to moral sensitivity: a neurodevelopmental study.
Decety J; Michalska KJ; Kinzler KD
Cereb Cortex; 2012 Jan; 22(1):209-20. PubMed ID: 21616985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. [On the necessity to distinguishing judgment from subjective choice in the cognitive neuroscience of morality].
Tassy S
Med Sci (Paris); 2011 Oct; 27(10):889-94. PubMed ID: 22027427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
