These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

322 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22698994)

  • 81. Activating analytic thinking enhances the value given to individualizing moral foundations.
    Yilmaz O; Saribay SA
    Cognition; 2017 Aug; 165():88-96. PubMed ID: 28527318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 82. Structured terror: further exploring the effects of mortality salience and personal need for structure on worldview defense.
    Juhl J; Routledge C
    J Pers; 2010 Jun; 78(3):969-90. PubMed ID: 20573132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 83. Being present in the face of existential threat: The role of trait mindfulness in reducing defensive responses to mortality salience.
    Niemiec CP; Brown KW; Kashdan TB; Cozzolino PJ; Breen WE; Levesque-Bristol C; Ryan RM
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2010 Aug; 99(2):344-65. PubMed ID: 20658848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 84. Testosterone and cortisol do not predict rejecting harm or maximizing outcomes in sacrificial moral dilemmas: A preregistered analysis.
    Reynolds CJ; Makhanova A; Nikonova L; Eckel LA; Conway P
    Horm Behav; 2021 Nov; 136():105063. PubMed ID: 34598057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 85. Perceiving utilitarian gradients: Heart rate variability and self-regulatory effort in the moral dilemma task.
    Rosas A; Bermúdez JP; Martínez Cotrina J; Aguilar-Pardo D; Caicedo Mera JC; Aponte-Canencio DM
    Soc Neurosci; 2021 Aug; 16(4):391-405. PubMed ID: 34061717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 86. The effect of mortality salience on the evaluation of humorous material.
    Hackney CH
    J Soc Psychol; 2011; 151(1):51-62. PubMed ID: 21375125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 87. Reduced utilitarian willingness to violate personal rights during the COVID-19 pandemic.
    Antoniou R; Romero-Kornblum H; Young JC; You M; Kramer JH; Chiong W
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(10):e0259110. PubMed ID: 34679124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 88. Measuring moral judgment in nursing dilemmas.
    Crisham P
    Nurs Res; 1981; 30(2):104-10. PubMed ID: 6907863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 89. Religion and the morality of mentality.
    Cohen AB; Rozin P
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2001 Oct; 81(4):697-710. PubMed ID: 11642355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 90. Exploring the cognitive load of negative thinking: a novel dual-task experiment.
    Takano K; Iijima Y; Sakamoto S; Tanno Y
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2014 Dec; 45(4):435-40. PubMed ID: 24929783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 91. Moral judgment in patients with idiopathic generalized epilepsy.
    Jiang Y; Zhu Y; Wu J; Zhou N; Hu P; Wang K
    Seizure; 2016 Oct; 41():154-9. PubMed ID: 27567267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 92. Contrasting two models of utilitarian reasoning.
    Antoniou R; Romero-Kornblum H; Young JC; You M; Kramer JH; Rankin KP; Chiong W
    Heliyon; 2023 Jul; 9(7):e17498. PubMed ID: 37424598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 93. Finding faults: how moral dilemmas illuminate cognitive structure.
    Cushman F; Greene JD
    Soc Neurosci; 2012; 7(3):269-79. PubMed ID: 21942995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 94. Harm aversion explains utilitarian choices in moral decision-making in males but not in females.
    Rota G; Palumbo S; Lattanzi N; Manfrinati A; Sarlo M; Lotto L; Pietrini P; Rumiati R; Pellegrini S
    Arch Ital Biol; 2016 Jun; 154(2-3):50-58. PubMed ID: 27918062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 95. Children's evaluations of morality in the context of peer, teacher-child, and familial relations.
    Killen M
    J Genet Psychol; 1990 Sep; 151(3):395-410. PubMed ID: 2266358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 96. Moral dilemmas and moral rules.
    Nichols S; Mallon R
    Cognition; 2006 Jul; 100(3):530-42. PubMed ID: 16157325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 97. A psychophysiological investigation of moral judgment after ventromedial prefrontal damage.
    Moretto G; Làdavas E; Mattioli F; di Pellegrino G
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Aug; 22(8):1888-99. PubMed ID: 19925181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 98. A Single Counterexample Leads to Moral Belief Revision.
    Horne Z; Powell D; Hummel J
    Cogn Sci; 2015 Nov; 39(8):1950-64. PubMed ID: 25810137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 99. Deliberation's blindsight: how cognitive load can improve judgments.
    Hoffmann JA; von Helversen B; Rieskamp J
    Psychol Sci; 2013 Jun; 24(6):869-79. PubMed ID: 23575598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 100. A bad taste in the mouth: gustatory disgust influences moral judgment.
    Eskine KJ; Kacinik NA; Prinz JJ
    Psychol Sci; 2011 Mar; 22(3):295-9. PubMed ID: 21307274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.