These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22699008)

  • 21. Sex chromosome linkage of mate preference and color signal maintains assortative mating between interbreeding finch morphs.
    Pryke SR
    Evolution; 2010 May; 64(5):1301-10. PubMed ID: 19922444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Assortative mating for fitness and the evolution of recombination.
    Blachford A; Agrawal AF
    Evolution; 2006 Jul; 60(7):1337-43. PubMed ID: 16929651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Case studies and mathematical models of ecological speciation. 3: Ecotype formation in a Swedish snail.
    Sadedin S; Hollander J; Panova M; Johannesson K; Gavrilets S
    Mol Ecol; 2009 Oct; 18(19):4006-23. PubMed ID: 19754510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Genetic variability in sensitivity to population density affects the dynamics of simple ecological models.
    Doebeli M; de Jong G
    Theor Popul Biol; 1999 Feb; 55(1):37-52. PubMed ID: 9925807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Frequency-dependent sexual selection.
    O'Donald P; Majerus ME
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 1988 Jul; 319(1196):571-86. PubMed ID: 2905493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Mate choice for non-additive genetic benefits: a resolution to the lek paradox.
    Neff BD; Pitcher TE
    J Theor Biol; 2008 Sep; 254(1):147-55. PubMed ID: 18589454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Mate choice evolution, dominance effects, and the maintenance of genetic variation.
    Lehmann L; Keller LF; Kokko H
    J Theor Biol; 2007 Jan; 244(2):282-95. PubMed ID: 16979189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Sexual selection and immune function in Drosophila melanogaster.
    McKean KA; Nunney L
    Evolution; 2008 Feb; 62(2):386-400. PubMed ID: 18070086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A sexually neutral discrete Markov model for given sum males + females.
    Tyvand PA; Thorvaldsen S
    Theor Popul Biol; 2007 Aug; 72(1):148-52. PubMed ID: 17296213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Assortative mating by fitness and sexually antagonistic genetic variation.
    Arnqvist G
    Evolution; 2011 Jul; 65(7):2111-6. PubMed ID: 21729064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An evolutionary limit to male mating success.
    McGuigan K; Van Homrigh A; Blows MW
    Evolution; 2008 Jun; 62(6):1528-37. PubMed ID: 18363864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Revisiting Santa Rosalia to unfold a degeneracy of classic models of speciation.
    NorvaiĊĦas P; Kisdi E
    Am Nat; 2012 Sep; 180(3):388-93. PubMed ID: 22854081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Competitive speciation and costs of choosiness.
    Kopp M; Hermisson J
    J Evol Biol; 2008 Jul; 21(4):1005-23. PubMed ID: 18513357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Sexual conflict and the evolution of female preferences for indicators of male quality.
    van Doorn GS; Weissing FJ
    Am Nat; 2006 Dec; 168(6):742-57. PubMed ID: 17109317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Mating patterns in seminatural populations of mice influenced by MHC genotype.
    Potts WK; Manning CJ; Wakeland EK
    Nature; 1991 Aug; 352(6336):619-21. PubMed ID: 1865924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. How do natural and sexual selection contribute to sympatric speciation?
    Gourbiere S
    J Evol Biol; 2004 Nov; 17(6):1297-309. PubMed ID: 15525414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Gentlemen prefer blondes: the evolution of mate preference among strategically allocated males.
    Rowell JT; Servedio MR
    Am Nat; 2009 Jan; 173(1):12-25. PubMed ID: 19063659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Intermittency and transient chaos from simple frequency-dependent selection.
    Gavrilets S; Hastings A
    Proc Biol Sci; 1995 Aug; 261(1361):233-8. PubMed ID: 7568276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Genetic quality and sexual selection: an integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes.
    Neff BD; Pitcher TE
    Mol Ecol; 2005 Jan; 14(1):19-38. PubMed ID: 15643948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Mate choice and the genetic basis for colour variation in a polymorphic dart frog: inferences from a wild pedigree.
    Richards-Zawacki CL; Wang IJ; Summers K
    Mol Ecol; 2012 Aug; 21(15):3879-92. PubMed ID: 22650383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.