These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22699263)
1. Nonlinear finite element analysis of three implant- abutment interface designs. Tang CB; Liul SY; Zhou GX; Yu JH; Zhang GD; Bao YD; Wang QJ Int J Oral Sci; 2012 Jun; 4(2):101-8. PubMed ID: 22699263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of abutment screw preload in two implant connection systems: A 3D finite element study. Jung WK; Lee WS; Kwon HB J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Nov; 122(5):474.e1-474.e8. PubMed ID: 31590980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influences of internal tapered abutment designs on bone stresses around a dental implant: three-dimensional finite element method with statistical evaluation. Chu CM; Huang HL; Hsu JT; Fuh LJ J Periodontol; 2012 Jan; 83(1):111-8. PubMed ID: 21563947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of platform switching on stress distribution in implants and periimplant bone studied by nonlinear finite element analysis. Liu S; Tang C; Yu J; Dai W; Bao Y; Hu D J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1111-8. PubMed ID: 24882594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis on Stress Distribution of Internal Implant-Abutment Engagement Features. Cho SY; Huh YH; Park CJ; Cho LR Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(2):319-327. PubMed ID: 29534119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of the Stress Distribution at the Internal Implant-Abutment Connection. Cho SY; Huh YH; Park CJ; Cho LR Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2016; 36(3):e49-58. PubMed ID: 27100815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influences of implant neck design and implant-abutment joint type on peri-implant bone stress and abutment micromovement: three-dimensional finite element analysis. Yamanishi Y; Yamaguchi S; Imazato S; Nakano T; Yatani H Dent Mater; 2012 Nov; 28(11):1126-33. PubMed ID: 22920538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A finite element analysis of two different dental implants: stress distribution in the prosthesis, abutment, implant, and supporting bone. Quaresma SE; Cury PR; Sendyk WR; Sendyk C J Oral Implantol; 2008; 34(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 18390236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of platform connection and abutment material on stress distribution in single anterior implant-supported restorations: a nonlinear 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Carvalho MA; Sotto-Maior BS; Del Bel Cury AA; Pessanha Henriques GE J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1096-102. PubMed ID: 24831744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the mechanical characteristics of the implant-abutment complex of a reduced-diameter morse-taper implant. A nonlinear finite element stress analysis. Akça K; Cehreli MC; Iplikçioğlu H Clin Oral Implants Res; 2003 Aug; 14(4):444-54. PubMed ID: 12869007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of the implant design on peri-implant bone stress and abutment micromovement: three-dimensional finite element analysis of original computer-aided design models. Yamanishi Y; Yamaguchi S; Imazato S; Nakano T; Yatani H J Periodontol; 2014 Sep; 85(9):e333-8. PubMed ID: 24835549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of the prosthetic index on stress distribution in Morse taper connection implant system and peri-implant bone: a 3D finite element analysis. Zhang WT; Cheng KJ; Liu YF; Wang R; Chen YF; Ding YD; Yang F; Wang LH BMC Oral Health; 2022 Sep; 22(1):431. PubMed ID: 36180871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of implant/abutment joint designs on abutment screw loosening in a dental implant system. Kitagawa T; Tanimoto Y; Odaki M; Nemoto K; Aida M J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2005 Nov; 75(2):457-63. PubMed ID: 16041789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimization of the Conical Angle Design in Conical Implant-Abutment Connections: A Pilot Study Based on the Finite Element Method. Yao KT; Chen CS; Cheng CK; Fang HW; Huang CH; Kao HC; Hsu ML J Oral Implantol; 2018 Feb; 44(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 29090979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of implant abutment type on stress distribution in bone under various loading conditions using finite element analysis. Chun HJ; Shin HS; Han CH; Lee SH Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 16634489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro fatigue tests and in silico finite element analysis of dental implants with different fixture/abutment joint types using computer-aided design models. Yamaguchi S; Yamanishi Y; Machado LS; Matsumoto S; Tovar N; Coelho PG; Thompson VP; Imazato S J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Jan; 62(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 28427837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mechanical evaluation of an implant-abutment self-locking taper connection: finite element analysis and experimental tests. Sannino G; Barlattani A Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(1):e17-26. PubMed ID: 23377078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of different abutment connection designs on the stress distribution around five different implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Balik A; Karatas MO; Keskin H J Oral Implantol; 2012 Sep; 38 Spec No():491-6. PubMed ID: 21574838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of Implant-Abutment Connection Type on Stress Distribution in Peri-Implant Bone and Abutment Micromovement: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis. Torkzaban P; Ziaei N; Tootiaee B; Khoshhal M; Vafaee F; Panahandeh N J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2019; 29(2):113-124. PubMed ID: 32464020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Parafunctional loading and occlusal device on stress distribution around implants: A 3D finite element analysis. Borges Radaelli MT; Idogava HT; Spazzin AO; Noritomi PY; Boscato N J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Oct; 120(4):565-572. PubMed ID: 29724560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]