184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22699517)
1. High concordance between HercepTest immunohistochemistry and ERBB2 fluorescence in situ hybridization before and after implementation of American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathology 2007 guidelines.
Vergara-Lluri ME; Moatamed NA; Hong E; Apple SK
Mod Pathol; 2012 Oct; 25(10):1326-32. PubMed ID: 22699517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Implementation of American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists HER2 Guideline Recommendations in a tertiary care facility increases HER2 immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization concordance and decreases the number of inconclusive cases.
Middleton LP; Price KM; Puig P; Heydon LJ; Tarco E; Sneige N; Barr K; Deavers MT
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2009 May; 133(5):775-80. PubMed ID: 19415952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations on HER2 interpretation in breast cancer.
Shah SS; Ketterling RP; Goetz MP; Ingle JN; Reynolds CA; Perez EA; Chen B
Hum Pathol; 2010 Jan; 41(1):103-6. PubMed ID: 19762065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. High concordance between immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization testing for HER2 status in breast cancer requires a normalized IHC scoring system.
Gown AM; Goldstein LC; Barry TS; Kussick SJ; Kandalaft PL; Kim PM; Tse CC
Mod Pathol; 2008 Oct; 21(10):1271-7. PubMed ID: 18487992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Implications of the Updated 2013 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Guideline Recommendations on Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Gene Testing Using Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization for Breast Cancer.
Lim TH; Lim AS; Thike AA; Tien SL; Tan PH
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2016 Feb; 140(2):140-7. PubMed ID: 26910218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Next-generation assessment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 gene (ERBB2) amplification status in invasive breast carcinoma: a focus on Group 4 by use of the 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists HER2 testing guideline.
Hoda RS; Bowman AS; Zehir A; Razavi P; Brogi E; Ladanyi M; Arcila ME; Wen HY; Ross DS
Histopathology; 2021 Mar; 78(4):498-507. PubMed ID: 32841416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. High concordance between two companion diagnostics tests: a concordance study between the HercepTest and the HER2 FISH pharmDx kit.
Jørgensen JT; Møller S; Rasmussen BB; Winther H; Schønau A; Knoop A
Am J Clin Pathol; 2011 Jul; 136(1):145-51. PubMed ID: 21685042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of the updated 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines on HER2 FISH testing in invasive breast cancer: a retrospective study of HER2 fish results of 2233 cases.
Liu ZH; Wang K; Lin DY; Xu J; Chen J; Long XY; Ge Y; Luo XL; Zhang KP; Liu YH; Xu FP
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2019 May; 175(1):51-57. PubMed ID: 30712197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A retrospective population-based comparison of HER2 immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization in breast carcinomas: impact of 2007 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists criteria.
Schalper KA; Kumar S; Hui P; Rimm DL; Gershkovich P
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2014 Feb; 138(2):213-9. PubMed ID: 24164555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of the 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines on HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization interpretation in invasive breast cancers with immunohistochemically equivocal results.
Wang B; Ding W; Sun K; Wang X; Xu L; Teng X
Sci Rep; 2019 Nov; 9(1):16726. PubMed ID: 31723206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. New ASCO/CAP guideline recommendations for HER2 testing increase the proportion of reflex in situ hybridization tests and of HER2 positive breast cancers.
Tchrakian N; Flanagan L; Harford J; Gannon JM; Quinn CM
Virchows Arch; 2016 Feb; 468(2):207-11. PubMed ID: 26521061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. HER2 immunohistochemical and fluorescence in situ hybridization discordances in invasive breast carcinoma with micropapillary features.
Stewart RL; Caron JE; Gulbahce EH; Factor RE; Geiersbach KB; Downs-Kelly E
Mod Pathol; 2017 Nov; 30(11):1561-1566. PubMed ID: 28752841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Analysis of molecular subtypes for the increased HER2 equivocal cases caused by application of the updated 2013 ASCO/CAP HER2 testing guidelines in breast cancer.
Guo L; Yuan P; Zhang J; Ling Y; Li W; Zhao B; Ying J; Xuan L
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Nov; 166(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 28712009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dual-color dual-hapten in situ hybridization (D-DISH) - Comparison with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for HER2/neu testing in breast cancer.
Gajaria PK; Tambe S; Pai T; Patil A; Desai SB; Shet TM
Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2020; 63(2):194-199. PubMed ID: 32317514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of the updated 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) guidelines on Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) gene testing in invasive breast cancers: A single center study.
Lim TH; Lim AST; Tien SL; Tan PH
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2022 Jun; 58():151935. PubMed ID: 35313158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of an alternative chromosome 17 probe and the 2013 American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists guidelines on fluorescence in situ hybridization for the determination of HER2 gene amplification in breast cancer.
Donaldson AR; Shetty S; Wang Z; Rivera CL; Portier BP; Budd GT; Downs-Kelly E; Lanigan CP; Calhoun BC
Cancer; 2017 Jun; 123(12):2230-2239. PubMed ID: 28192599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of breast cancer HER-2 receptor testing with immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization.
Shanmugalingam A; Hitos K; Pathmanathan N; Edirimmane S; Hughes TM; Ngui NK
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2023 Feb; 198(1):143-148. PubMed ID: 36604351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The updated 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline on human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 interpretation in breast cancer: comparison with previous guidelines and clinical significance of the proposed in situ hybridization groups.
Woo JW; Lee K; Chung YR; Jang MH; Ahn S; Park SY
Hum Pathol; 2020 Apr; 98():10-21. PubMed ID: 32027910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laboratory compliance with the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing guidelines: a 3-year comparison of validation procedures.
Dyhdalo KS; Fitzgibbons PL; Goldsmith JD; Souers RJ; Nakhleh RE
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2014 Jul; 138(7):876-84. PubMed ID: 24978913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Delay to formalin fixation 'cold ischemia time': effect on ERBB2 detection by in-situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry.
Portier BP; Wang Z; Downs-Kelly E; Rowe JJ; Patil D; Lanigan C; Budd GT; Hicks DG; Rimm DL; Tubbs RR
Mod Pathol; 2013 Jan; 26(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 22899285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
