370 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22700131)
1. A dual-mobility cup reduces risk of dislocation in isolated acetabular revisions.
Civinini R; Carulli C; Matassi F; Nistri L; Innocenti M
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2012 Dec; 470(12):3542-8. PubMed ID: 22700131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. LUMiC
Bus MP; Szafranski A; Sellevold S; Goryn T; Jutte PC; Bramer JA; Fiocco M; Streitbürger A; Kotrych D; van de Sande MA; Dijkstra PD
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Mar; 475(3):686-695. PubMed ID: 27020434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Tantalum Components in Difficult Acetabular Revisions Have Good Survival at 5 to 10 Years: Longer Term Followup of a Previous Report.
Lachiewicz PF; O'Dell JA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 476(2):336-342. PubMed ID: 29529665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Low Frequency of Early Complications With Dual-mobility Acetabular Cups in Cementless Primary THA.
Chughtai M; Mistry JB; Diedrich AM; Jauregui JJ; Elmallah RK; Bonutti PM; Harwin SF; Malkani AL; Kolisek FR; Mont MA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2181-7. PubMed ID: 27106128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Second-generation modular acetabular components provide fixation at 10 to 16 years.
Lachiewicz PF; Soileau ES
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2012 Feb; 470(2):366-72. PubMed ID: 21691908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dual-mobility bearings for patients with abductor-trochanteric complex insufficiency.
Ozden VE; Dikmen G; Beksac B; Tozun R
Hip Int; 2018 Sep; 28(5):491-497. PubMed ID: 29781290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is Isolated Mobile Component Exchange an Option in the Management of Intraprosthetic Dislocation of a Dual Mobility Cup?
Wegrzyn J; Malatray M; Pibarot V; Anania G; Béjui-Hugues J
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Feb; 478(2):279-287. PubMed ID: 31794492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ceramic-on-ceramic THA associated with fewer dislocations and less muscle degeneration by preserving muscle progenitors.
Hernigou P; Roussignol X; Delambre J; Poignard A; Flouzat-Lachaniette CH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3762-9. PubMed ID: 26054482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Promising Mid-term Results With a Cup-cage Construct for Large Acetabular Defects and Pelvic Discontinuity.
Amenabar T; Rahman WA; Hetaimish BM; Kuzyk PR; Safir OA; Gross AE
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):408-14. PubMed ID: 25712864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dual Mobility Acetabular Cups in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients at High Risk for Dislocation.
Harwin SF; Mistry JB; Chughtai M; Khlopas A; Gwam C; Newman JM; Higuera CA; Bonutti PM; Malkani AL; Kolisek FR; Delanois RE; Mont MA
Surg Technol Int; 2017 Jul; 30():251-258. PubMed ID: 28395391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Satisfying Results of Primary Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With Hip Dysplasia at a Mean Followup of 20 Years.
Colo E; Rijnen WH; Gardeniers JW; van Kampen A; Schreurs BW
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Nov; 474(11):2462-2468. PubMed ID: 27492686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does a titanium-coated polyethylene press-fit cup give reliable midterm results?
Hooper N; Sargeant H; Frampton C; Hooper G
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3806-10. PubMed ID: 26373851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Otto Aufranc Award: Dual-mobility Constructs in Revision THA Reduced Dislocation, Rerevision, and Reoperation Compared With Large Femoral Heads.
Hartzler MA; Abdel MP; Sculco PK; Taunton MJ; Pagnano MW; Hanssen AD
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 476(2):293-301. PubMed ID: 29529658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Acetabular component positioning using anatomic landmarks of the acetabulum.
Ha YC; Yoo JJ; Lee YK; Kim JY; Koo KH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2012 Dec; 470(12):3515-23. PubMed ID: 22777589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Revision total hip arthroplasty using a reconstruction cage device and a cemented dual mobility cup.
Schneider L; Philippot R; Boyer B; Farizon F
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2011 Dec; 97(8):807-13. PubMed ID: 22119512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ceramic-on-ceramic THA Implants in Patients Younger Than 20 Years.
Hannouche D; Devriese F; Delambre J; Zadegan F; Tourabaly I; Sedel L; Chevret S; Nizard R
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):520-7. PubMed ID: 26341897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fixation, survival, and dislocation of jumbo acetabular components in revision hip arthroplasty.
Lachiewicz PF; Soileau ES
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Mar; 95(6):543-8. PubMed ID: 23515989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Can Dislocation of a Constrained Liner Be Salvaged With Dual-mobility Constructs in Revision THA?
Chalmers BP; Pallante GD; Taunton MJ; Sierra RJ; Trousdale RT
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 476(2):305-312. PubMed ID: 29529660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reconstruction of the Shallow Acetabulum With a Combination of Autologous Bulk and Impaction Bone Grafting Fixed by Cement.
Maruyama M; Wakabayashi S; Ota H; Tensho K
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Feb; 475(2):387-395. PubMed ID: 27837399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. What Is the Risk of Dislocation and Revision in Proximal Femoral Replacement with Dual-mobility Articulation After Two-stage Revision for Periprosthetic Hip Infection?
Theil C; Schwarze J; Smolle MA; Pützler J; Moellenbeck B; Schneider KN; Schulze M; Klingebiel S; Gosheger G
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2023 Sep; 481(9):1792-1799. PubMed ID: 36897193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
