370 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22700131)
21. What Are the Long-term Results of Cemented Revision THA with Use of Both Acetabular and Femoral Impaction Bone Grafting in Patients Younger Than 55 Years?
Verspeek J; Nijenhuis TA; Kuijpers MFL; Rijnen WHC; Schreurs BW
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Jan; 479(1):84-91. PubMed ID: 32898047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Pelvic discontinuity treated with custom triflange component: a reliable option.
Taunton MJ; Fehring TK; Edwards P; Bernasek T; Holt GE; Christie MJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2012 Feb; 470(2):428-34. PubMed ID: 21997785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Complications Are Not Increased With Acetabular Revision of Metal-on-metal Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Penrose CT; Seyler TM; Wellman SS; Bolognesi MP; Lachiewicz PF
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2134-42. PubMed ID: 26987866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Novel Acetabular Cup for Revision THA Improves Hip Center of Rotation: A Radiographic Evaluation.
Khlopas A; Chughtai M; Elmallah RK; Hip-Flores D; Malkani AL; Harwin SF; Mont MA; Ries MD
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 476(2):315-322. PubMed ID: 29529662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Does dual-mobility cup geometry affect posterior horizontal dislocation distance?
Heffernan C; Banerjee S; Nevelos J; Macintyre J; Issa K; Markel DC; Mont MA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 May; 472(5):1535-44. PubMed ID: 24464508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Total hip arthroplasty revision by dual-mobility acetabular cup cemented in a metal reinforcement: A 62 case series at a minimum 5 years' follow-up.
Lebeau N; Bayle M; Belhaouane R; Chelli M; Havet E; Brunschweiler B; Mertl P
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2017 Sep; 103(5):679-684. PubMed ID: 28578096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. No Benefit After THA Performed With Computer-assisted Cup Placement: 10-year Results of a Randomized Controlled Study.
Parratte S; Ollivier M; Lunebourg A; Flecher X; Argenson JN
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2085-93. PubMed ID: 27150344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Cup-cage reconstruction for severe acetabular bone loss and pelvic discontinuity: Mid-term Results of a Consecutive Series of 35 Cases.
Hipfl C; Janz V; Löchel J; Perka C; Wassilew GI
Bone Joint J; 2018 Nov; 100-B(11):1442-1448. PubMed ID: 30418066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Dual-mobility cups in revision acetabular reconstructions: Short-term outcomes in high-risk patients for instability.
Dikmen G; Ozden VE; Karaytug K; Tozun R
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2019 Sep; 53(5):329-333. PubMed ID: 31281078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Revisions of extensive acetabular defects with impaction grafting and a cement cup.
van Egmond N; De Kam DC; Gardeniers JW; Schreurs BW
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2011 Feb; 469(2):562-73. PubMed ID: 20931308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Salvage of failed acetabular cages by nonbuttressed trabecular metal cups.
Kosashvili Y; Safir O; Backstein D; Lakstein D; Gross AE
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Feb; 468(2):466-71. PubMed ID: 19543864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Outcomes of Dual Mobility Acetabular Cups in Total Hip Arthroplasty Patients.
Harwin SF; Sodhi N; Ehiorobo J; Khlopas A; Sultan AA; Mont MA
Surg Technol Int; 2019 May; 34():367-370. PubMed ID: 30500976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Tantalum augments for Paprosky IIIA defects remain stable at midterm followup.
Del Gaizo DJ; Kancherla V; Sporer SM; Paprosky WG
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2012 Feb; 470(2):395-401. PubMed ID: 22090355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The Safe Zone Range for Cup Anteversion Is Narrower Than for Inclination in THA.
Murphy WS; Yun HH; Hayden B; Kowal JH; Murphy SB
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 476(2):325-335. PubMed ID: 29529664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Outcomes of isolated acetabular revision.
Lawless BM; Healy WL; Sharma S; Iorio R
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Feb; 468(2):472-9. PubMed ID: 19789935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Large acetabular defects can be managed with cementless revision components.
Paxton ES; Keeney JA; Maloney WJ; Clohisy JC
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2011 Feb; 469(2):483-93. PubMed ID: 20922585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Survivorship and Radiographic Analysis of Highly Porous Acetabular Cups Designed for Improved Osseointegration Potential.
Sodhi N; Khlopas A; Berliner Z; Dushaj K; Minter JE; Naylor B; Marchand R; Hepinstall MS; Mont MA
Surg Technol Int; 2019 May; 34():425-429. PubMed ID: 30753741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Cementing a Monoblock Dual-Mobility Implant into a Fully Porous Cup in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty to Address Hip Instability: Surgical Technique.
Shichman I; Habibi AA; Robin JX; Gemayel AC; Lowe DT; Schwarzkopf R
JBJS Essent Surg Tech; 2023; 13(4):. PubMed ID: 38357466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Long-term results and bone remodeling after THA with a short, metaphyseal-fitting anatomic cementless stem.
Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS; Kang JS
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Mar; 472(3):943-50. PubMed ID: 24163094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The medium term outcome of the Omnifit constrained acetabular cup.
Bigsby E; Whitehouse MR; Bannister GC; Blom AW
Hip Int; 2012; 22(5):505-10. PubMed ID: 23100150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
