These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22700207)
1. Mating compatibility and competitiveness of transgenic and wild type Aedes aegypti (L.) under contained semi-field conditions. Lee HL; Vasan S; Ahmad NW; Idris I; Hanum N; Selvi S; Alphey L; Murad S Transgenic Res; 2013 Feb; 22(1):47-57. PubMed ID: 22700207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. No evidence for successful interspecific cross-mating of transgenic Aedes aegypti (L.) and wild type Aedes albopictus Skuse. Lee HL; Aramu M; Nazni WA; Selvi S; Vasan S Trop Biomed; 2009 Dec; 26(3):312-9. PubMed ID: 20237445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mating Competitiveness of Transgenic Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) Males Against Wild-Type Males Reared Under Simulated Field Conditions. Kang DS; Cunningham JM; Lovin DD; Chadee DD; Severson DW J Med Entomol; 2020 Nov; 57(6):1775-1781. PubMed ID: 32556270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mating competitiveness and life-table comparisons between transgenic and Indian wild-type Aedes aegypti L. Patil PB; Reddy BP; Gorman K; Reddy KV; Barwale SR; Zehr UB; Nimmo D; Naish N; Alphey L Pest Manag Sci; 2015 Jul; 71(7):957-65. PubMed ID: 25078081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Too "sexy" for the field? Paired measures of laboratory and semi-field performance highlight variability in the apparent mating fitness of Aedes aegypti transgenic strains. Aldersley A; Pongsiri A; Bunmee K; Kijchalao U; Chittham W; Fansiri T; Pathawong N; Qureshi A; Harrington LC; Ponlawat A; Cator LJ Parasit Vectors; 2019 Jul; 12(1):357. PubMed ID: 31324262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Combining the Sterile Insect Technique with the Incompatible Insect Technique: III-Robust Mating Competitiveness of Irradiated Triple Wolbachia-Infected Aedes albopictus Males under Semi-Field Conditions. Zhang D; Lees RS; Xi Z; Bourtzis K; Gilles JR PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0151864. PubMed ID: 26990981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cross-mating between Malaysian strains of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus in the laboratory. Nazni WA; Lee HL; Dayang HA; Azahari AH Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 2009 Jan; 40(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 19323032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Oral ingestion of transgenic RIDL Ae. aegypti larvae has no negative effect on two predator Toxorhynchites species. Nordin O; Donald W; Ming WH; Ney TG; Mohamed KA; Halim NA; Winskill P; Hadi AA; Muhammad ZS; Lacroix R; Scaife S; McKemey AR; Beech C; Shahnaz M; Alphey L; Nimmo DD; Nazni WA; Lee HL PLoS One; 2013; 8(3):e58805. PubMed ID: 23527029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Field performance of engineered male mosquitoes. Harris AF; Nimmo D; McKemey AR; Kelly N; Scaife S; Donnelly CA; Beech C; Petrie WD; Alphey L Nat Biotechnol; 2011 Oct; 29(11):1034-7. PubMed ID: 22037376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Aedes albopictus (Skuse) males in laboratory and semi-field cages: release ratios and mating competitiveness. Madakacherry O; Lees RS; Gilles JR Acta Trop; 2014 Apr; 132 Suppl():S124-9. PubMed ID: 24299924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of virus-blocking Wolbachia on male competitiveness of the dengue vector mosquito, Aedes aegypti. Segoli M; Hoffmann AA; Lloyd J; Omodei GJ; Ritchie SA PLoS Negl Trop Dis; 2014 Dec; 8(12):e3294. PubMed ID: 25502564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost of mating and insemination capacity of a genetically modified mosquito Aedes aegypti OX513A compared to its wild type counterpart. Bargielowski I; Alphey L; Koella JC PLoS One; 2011; 6(10):e26086. PubMed ID: 22022518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mass production of genetically modified Aedes aegypti for field releases in Brazil. Carvalho DO; Nimmo D; Naish N; McKemey AR; Gray P; Wilke AB; Marrelli MT; Virginio JF; Alphey L; Capurro ML J Vis Exp; 2014 Jan; (83):e3579. PubMed ID: 24430003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mechanisms of sex determination and transmission ratio distortion in Aedes aegypti. Hoang KP; Teo TM; Ho TX; Le VS Parasit Vectors; 2016 Jan; 9():49. PubMed ID: 26818000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Flight performance and teneral energy reserves of two genetically-modified and one wild-type strain of the yellow fever mosquito Aedes aegypti. Bargielowski I; Kaufmann C; Alphey L; Reiter P; Koella J Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis; 2012 Dec; 12(12):1053-8. PubMed ID: 22835152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Male mating competitiveness of a Wolbachia-introgressed Aedes polynesiensis strain under semi-field conditions. Chambers EW; Hapairai L; Peel BA; Bossin H; Dobson SL PLoS Negl Trop Dis; 2011 Aug; 5(8):e1271. PubMed ID: 21829750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Open field release of genetically engineered sterile male Aedes aegypti in Malaysia. Lacroix R; McKemey AR; Raduan N; Kwee Wee L; Hong Ming W; Guat Ney T; Rahidah A A S; Salman S; Subramaniam S; Nordin O; Hanum A T N; Angamuthu C; Marlina Mansor S; Lees RS; Naish N; Scaife S; Gray P; Labbé G; Beech C; Nimmo D; Alphey L; Vasan SS; Han Lim L; Wasi A N; Murad S PLoS One; 2012; 7(8):e42771. PubMed ID: 22970102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Male sexual history influences female fertility and re-mating incidence in the mosquito vector Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae). Felipe Ramírez-Sánchez L; Camargo C; Avila FW J Insect Physiol; 2020; 121():104019. PubMed ID: 32032591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Silencing the buzz: a new approach to population suppression of mosquitoes by feeding larvae double-stranded RNAs. Whyard S; Erdelyan CN; Partridge AL; Singh AD; Beebe NW; Capina R Parasit Vectors; 2015 Feb; 8():96. PubMed ID: 25880645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]