303 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22700555)
1. Breast cancer: missed interval and screening-detected cancer at full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography-- results from a retrospective review.
Hoff SR; Abrahamsen AL; Samset JH; Vigeland E; Klepp O; Hofvind S
Radiology; 2012 Aug; 264(2):378-86. PubMed ID: 22700555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Randomized trial of screen-film versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading in population-based screening program: follow-up and final results of Oslo II study.
Skaane P; Hofvind S; Skjennald A
Radiology; 2007 Sep; 244(3):708-17. PubMed ID: 17709826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Follow-up and final results of the Oslo I Study comparing screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading.
Skaane P; Skjennald A; Young K; Egge E; Jebsen I; Sager EM; Scheel B; Søvik E; Ertzaas AK; Hofvind S; Abdelnoor M
Acta Radiol; 2005 Nov; 46(7):679-89. PubMed ID: 16372686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography in a population-based screening program: The Sogn and Fjordane study.
Juel IM; Skaane P; Hoff SR; Johannessen G; Hofvind S
Acta Radiol; 2010 Nov; 51(9):962-8. PubMed ID: 20942729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading: randomized trial in a population-based screening program--the Oslo II Study.
Skaane P; Skjennald A
Radiology; 2004 Jul; 232(1):197-204. PubMed ID: 15155893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of full-field digital mammography with screen-film mammography for cancer detection: results of 4,945 paired examinations.
Lewin JM; Hendrick RE; D'Orsi CJ; Isaacs PK; Moss LJ; Karellas A; Sisney GA; Kuni CC; Cutter GR
Radiology; 2001 Mar; 218(3):873-80. PubMed ID: 11230669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparison within the UK breast screening program and systematic review of published data.
Vinnicombe S; Pinto Pereira SM; McCormack VA; Shiel S; Perry N; Dos Santos Silva IM
Radiology; 2009 May; 251(2):347-58. PubMed ID: 19401569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Breast cancer screening results 5 years after introduction of digital mammography in a population-based screening program.
Karssemeijer N; Bluekens AM; Beijerinck D; Deurenberg JJ; Beekman M; Visser R; van Engen R; Bartels-Kortland A; Broeders MJ
Radiology; 2009 Nov; 253(2):353-8. PubMed ID: 19703851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of review design on percentages of missed interval breast cancers: retrospective study of interval cancers in a population-based screening program.
Hofvind S; Skaane P; Vitak B; Wang H; Thoresen S; Eriksen L; Bjørndal H; Braaten A; Bjurstam N
Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):437-43. PubMed ID: 16244251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Full-field digital mammography compared to screen film mammography in the prevalent round of a population-based screening programme: the Vestfold County Study.
Vigeland E; Klaasen H; Klingen TA; Hofvind S; Skaane P
Eur Radiol; 2008 Jan; 18(1):183-91. PubMed ID: 17680246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Moving into the digital era: a novel experience with the first full-field digital mammography system in Malaysia.
Ranganathan S; Faridah Y; Ng KH
Singapore Med J; 2007 Sep; 48(9):804-7. PubMed ID: 17728959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of digital mammography and screen-film mammography in breast cancer screening: a review in the Irish breast screening program.
Hambly NM; McNicholas MM; Phelan N; Hargaden GC; O'Doherty A; Flanagan FL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Oct; 193(4):1010-8. PubMed ID: 19770323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Missed and true interval and screen-detected breast cancers in a population based screening program.
Hoff SR; Samset JH; Abrahamsen AL; Vigeland E; Klepp O; Hofvind S
Acad Radiol; 2011 Apr; 18(4):454-60. PubMed ID: 21216632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms.
Skaane P; Kshirsagar A; Stapleton S; Young K; Castellino RA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):377-84. PubMed ID: 17242245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mammography screening using independent double reading with consensus: is there a potential benefit for computer-aided detection?
Skaane P; Kshirsagar A; Hofvind S; Jahr G; Castellino RA
Acta Radiol; 2012 Apr; 53(3):241-8. PubMed ID: 22287148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Digital vs screen-film mammography in population-based breast cancer screening: performance indicators and tumour characteristics of screen-detected and interval cancers.
de Munck L; de Bock GH; Otter R; Reiding D; Broeders MJ; Willemse PH; Siesling S
Br J Cancer; 2016 Aug; 115(5):517-24. PubMed ID: 27490807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Digital mammography in a screening programme and its implications for pathology: a comparative study.
Feeley L; Kiernan D; Mooney T; Flanagan F; Hargaden G; Kell M; Stokes M; Kennedy M
J Clin Pathol; 2011 Mar; 64(3):215-9. PubMed ID: 21177749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of screen-film and full-field digital mammography: image contrast and lesion characterization.
Yamada T; Ishibashi T; Sato A; Saito M; Saito H; Matsuhashi T; Takahashi S
Radiat Med; 2003; 21(4):166-71. PubMed ID: 14514123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of screen-film and full-field digital mammography in Japanese population-based screening.
Yamada T; Saito M; Ishibashi T; Tsuboi M; Matsuhashi T; Sato A; Saito H; Takahashi S; Onuki K; Ouchi N
Radiat Med; 2004; 22(6):408-12. PubMed ID: 15648457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Conspicuity of breast cancer according to histopathological type and breast density when imaged by full-field digital mammography compared with screen-film mammography.
Pinker K; Perry N; Vinnicombe S; Shiel S; Weber M
Eur Radiol; 2011 Jan; 21(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 20683600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
