These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Analysis and Synthesis of Natural Texture Perception From Visual Evoked Potentials. Orima T; Motoyoshi I Front Neurosci; 2021; 15():698940. PubMed ID: 34381330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Photorealistic Reconstruction of Visual Texture From EEG Signals. Wakita S; Orima T; Motoyoshi I Front Comput Neurosci; 2021; 15():754587. PubMed ID: 34867251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Visual N1 Is Sensitive to Deviations from Natural Texture Appearance. Balas B; Conlin C PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0136471. PubMed ID: 26355681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. On the mechanism for scale invariance in orientation-defined textures. Kingdom FA; Keeble DR Vision Res; 1999 Apr; 39(8):1477-89. PubMed ID: 10343816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Textures vs Non-Textures: A Simple Computational Method for Classifying Perceived 'Texturality' in Natural Images. Kurosawa F; Orima T; Okada K; Motoyoshi I Iperception; 2021; 12(5):20416695211054540. PubMed ID: 34876972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contrast negation and texture synthesis differentially disrupt natural texture appearance. Balas B Front Psychol; 2012; 3():515. PubMed ID: 23181049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A parametric texture model based on deep convolutional features closely matches texture appearance for humans. Wallis TSA; Funke CM; Ecker AS; Gatys LA; Wichmann FA; Bethge M J Vis; 2017 Oct; 17(12):5. PubMed ID: 28983571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Locally rotation, contrast, and scale invariant descriptors for texture analysis. Mellor M; Hong BW; Brady M IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2008 Jan; 30(1):52-61. PubMed ID: 18000324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Low-Level Contrast Statistics of Natural Images Can Modulate the Frequency of Event-Related Potentials (ERP) in Humans. Ghodrati M; Ghodousi M; Yoonessi A Front Hum Neurosci; 2016; 10():630. PubMed ID: 28018197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Neural sensitivity to natural image statistics changes during middle childhood. Balas B; Saville A Dev Psychobiol; 2021 Jul; 63(5):1061-1070. PubMed ID: 33233018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Human perception of subresolution fineness of dense textures based on image intensity statistics. Sawayama M; Nishida S; Shinya M J Vis; 2017 Apr; 17(4):8. PubMed ID: 28423413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Statistical Invariance for Texture Synthesis. Liu X; Jiang L; Wong TT; Fu CW IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2012 Nov; 18(11):1836-48. PubMed ID: 22392711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Attentive texture similarity as a categorization task: Comparing texture synthesis models. Balas B Pattern Recognit; 2008 Mar; 41(3):972-982. PubMed ID: 20890384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Image statistics underlying natural texture selectivity of neurons in macaque V4. Okazawa G; Tajima S; Komatsu H Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Jan; 112(4):E351-60. PubMed ID: 25535362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A signature dissimilarity measure for trabecular bone texture in knee radiographs. Woloszynski T; Podsiadlo P; Stachowiak GW; Kurzynski M Med Phys; 2010 May; 37(5):2030-42. PubMed ID: 20527536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]