These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2270152)

  • 1. Professional review and regulations.
    George JE; Quattrone MS; Phillips J
    N J Med; 1990 Dec; 87(12):983-6. PubMed ID: 2270152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Professional Medical Conduct Reform Act.
    Murphy SP
    N J Med; 1990 Dec; 87(12):989-92. PubMed ID: 2270153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Peer review and protective laws in Pennsylvania.
    Gosfield AG; Gosfield GG
    Pa Med; 1979 Jun; 82(6):44-50. PubMed ID: 572526
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Physician peer review: have we gone far enough or too far?
    Cardwell MS; Gay JW
    Mo Med; 1991 Apr; 88(4):221-5. PubMed ID: 1857331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Federal PRO program undergoing fundamental transformation.
    Kingsley DI; Rodi AE
    N J Med; 1992 May; 89(5):401-2. PubMed ID: 1635680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Commentary: The Peer Review Organization of New Jersey, Inc.
    Kingsley DI
    J Med Soc N J; 1985 Mar; 82(3):229-30. PubMed ID: 3856688
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986. New benefits and burdens for physicians.
    Mickelsen RA
    Minn Med; 1987 Dec; 70(12):691-3. PubMed ID: 3696122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. PRO proposal jeopardizes confidentiality.
    Am Med News; 1984 Jul; 27(27):4. PubMed ID: 11653592
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Antitrust's recent attack on the peer review practitioner: is the Health Care Quality Improvement Act a viable remedy?
    Rifkin AM; Evans GE; Hall GD
    Md Med J; 1990 Jan; 39(1):21-32. PubMed ID: 2308484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Threat to confidentiality of peer review data.
    Mosberg WH
    Neurosurgery; 1980 Mar; 6(3):340-1. PubMed ID: 7189833
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Update: PSRO transmittal. Peer review by health care practitioners other than physicians.
    Rogers J
    Med Rec News; 1977 Apr; 48(2):45-51. PubMed ID: 10305612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. MSNJ Peer Review Organization Criteria Committee.
    Krosnick A
    J Med Soc N J; 1985 Mar; 82(3):194-5. PubMed ID: 3856683
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Letter: Peer review or federal peering?
    N Engl J Med; 1973 Nov; 289(19):1045-6. PubMed ID: 4795415
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. P.S.R.O. confidentiality threatened.
    Hosp Peer Rev; 1978 May; 3(5):61-3. PubMed ID: 10273109
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. AAPS suit challenges PSRO law.
    Eye Ear Nose Throat Mon; 1973 Aug; 52(8):298-9. PubMed ID: 4738623
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Peer review is in the profession's best interest.
    White ER
    J Leg Med (N Y); 1974; 2(5):34-7. PubMed ID: 4548703
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Recent court decisions impact current peer review activity.
    Beatty Y
    Tenn Med; 2010 Sep; 103(8):17. PubMed ID: 20961014
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The importance of documentation in peer review.
    Kingsley DI
    N J Med; 1989 Mar; 86(3):185-6. PubMed ID: 2704433
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Federal regulations and MRPs.
    Waterstraat MJ
    Med Rec News; 1975 Dec; 46(6):12-7. PubMed ID: 10273085
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Providers question PROs' effectiveness. Critics contend peer review organizations are too costly and fail to improve the quality of care.
    Rothschild RD
    Health Prog; 1992; 73(6):28-32, 38. PubMed ID: 10119535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.