These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
12. Inter-ocular transfer of stimulus cueing in dominance selection at the onset of binocular rivalry. Kamphuisen AP; van Wezel RJ; van Ee R Vision Res; 2007 Apr; 47(9):1142-4. PubMed ID: 17360017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Preserved gain control for luminance contrast during binocular rivalry suppression. Watanabe K; Paik Y; Blake R Vision Res; 2004 Dec; 44(26):3065-71. PubMed ID: 15474579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interocular suppression in normal and amblyopic subjects: the effect of unilateral attenuation with neutral density filters. Leonards U; Sireteanu R Percept Psychophys; 1993 Jul; 54(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 8351189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hierarchy of cortical responses underlying binocular rivalry. Lee SH; Blake R; Heeger DJ Nat Neurosci; 2007 Aug; 10(8):1048-54. PubMed ID: 17632508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance under dichoptic versus binocular viewing conditions: effects of attention and task requirements. Kimchi R; Gopher D; Rubin Y; Raij D Hum Factors; 1993 Mar; 35(1):35-55. PubMed ID: 8509105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A bias for looming stimuli to predominate in binocular rivalry. Parker A; Alais D Vision Res; 2007 Sep; 47(20):2661-74. PubMed ID: 17707453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The time course of binocular rivalry reveals a fundamental role of noise. Brascamp JW; van Ee R; Noest AJ; Jacobs RH; van den Berg AV J Vis; 2006 Oct; 6(11):1244-56. PubMed ID: 17209732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analysis of temporal suppression mechanism in binocular rivalry. Sohmiya T; Sohmiya K Percept Mot Skills; 1985 Jun; 60(3):995-8. PubMed ID: 4022745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]