These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22703668)

  • 61. The efficacy of ProTaper Universal rotary retreatment instrumentation to remove single gutta-percha cones cemented with several endodontic sealers.
    Ersev H; Yilmaz B; Dinçol ME; Dağlaroğlu R
    Int Endod J; 2012 Aug; 45(8):756-62. PubMed ID: 22432937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Dentinal microcrack formation during root canal preparations by different NiTi rotary instruments and the self-adjusting file.
    Yoldas O; Yilmaz S; Atakan G; Kuden C; Kasan Z
    J Endod; 2012 Feb; 38(2):232-5. PubMed ID: 22244643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Quantitative Transportation Assessment in Simulated Curved Canals Prepared with an Adaptive Movement System.
    Silva EJ; Tameirão MD; Belladonna FG; Neves AA; Souza EM; De-Deus G
    J Endod; 2015 Jul; 41(7):1125-9. PubMed ID: 25841956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Radiological evaluation of the morphological changes of root canals shaped with ProTaper for hand use and the ProTaper and RaCe rotary instruments.
    Aguiar CM; Câmara AC
    Aust Endod J; 2008 Dec; 34(3):115-9. PubMed ID: 19032646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Rotary Mtwo system versus manual K-file instruments: efficacy in preparing primary and permanent molar root canals.
    Azar MR; Mokhtare M
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):363. PubMed ID: 21891918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Rotary nickel-titanium GT and ProTaper files for root canal shaping by novice operators: a radiographic and micro-computed tomography evaluation.
    Gekelman D; Ramamurthy R; Mirfarsi S; Paqué F; Peters OA
    J Endod; 2009 Nov; 35(11):1584-8. PubMed ID: 19840653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. ProTaper rotary instrument fracture during root canal preparation: a comparison between rotary and hybrid techniques.
    Farid H; Khan FR; Rahman M
    Oral Health Dent Manag; 2013 Mar; 12(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 23474581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Comparison of dentine removal using V-taper and K-Flexofile instruments.
    Akhlaghi NM; Kahali R; Abtahi A; Tabatabaee S; Mehrvarzfar P; Parirokh M
    Int Endod J; 2010 Nov; 43(11):1029-36. PubMed ID: 20636352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability of rotary ProTaper compared with rotary GT and manual K-Flexofile.
    Liu SB; Fan B; Cheung GS; Peng B; Fan MW; Gutmann JL; Song YL; Fu Q; Bian Z
    Am J Dent; 2006 Dec; 19(6):353-8. PubMed ID: 17212077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Analysis of Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of Single-file Systems.
    Hasheminia SM; Farhad A; Sheikhi M; Soltani P; Hendi SS; Ahmadi M
    J Endod; 2018 Dec; 44(12):1788-1791. PubMed ID: 30390970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Efficacy, cleaning ability and safety of different rotary NiTi instruments in root canal retreatment.
    Hülsmann M; Bluhm V
    Int Endod J; 2004 Jul; 37(7):468-76. PubMed ID: 15189436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Hard-tissue debris accumulation created by conventional rotary versus self-adjusting file instrumentation in mesial root canal systems of mandibular molars.
    Paqué F; Al-Jadaa A; Kfir A
    Int Endod J; 2012 May; 45(5):413-8. PubMed ID: 22188277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Assessing apical transportation in curved canals: comparison between cross-sections and micro-computed tomography.
    Freire LG; Gavini G; Cunha RS; Santos Md
    Braz Oral Res; 2012; 26(3):222-7. PubMed ID: 22641441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper.
    Bürklein S; Hinschitza K; Dammaschke T; Schäfer E
    Int Endod J; 2012 May; 45(5):449-61. PubMed ID: 22188401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. The effectiveness of a self-adjusting file to remove residual gutta-percha after retreatment with rotary files.
    Abramovitz I; Relles-Bonar S; Baransi B; Kfir A
    Int Endod J; 2012 Apr; 45(4):386-92. PubMed ID: 22283664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Apical enlargement according to different pecking times at working length using reciprocating files.
    Jeon HJ; Paranjpe A; Ha JH; Kim E; Lee W; Kim HC
    J Endod; 2014 Feb; 40(2):281-4. PubMed ID: 24461419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Canal transportation after root canal instrumentation: a comparative study with computed tomography.
    Hartmann MS; Barletta FB; Camargo Fontanella VR; Vanni JR
    J Endod; 2007 Aug; 33(8):962-5. PubMed ID: 17878083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Can size 20, .04 taper rotary files reproducibly create a glide path for the self-adjusting file? An ex vivo study in MB canals of mandibular molars.
    Kfir A; Goldberger T; Koren T; Pawar AM; Abramovitz I
    Int Endod J; 2016 Mar; 49(3):301-6. PubMed ID: 25772461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Radiographic identification of separated instruments retained in the apical third of root canal-filled teeth.
    Rosen E; Azizi H; Friedlander C; Taschieri S; Tsesis I
    J Endod; 2014 Oct; 40(10):1549-52. PubMed ID: 25159723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Assessment of the deviation after biomechanical preparation of the coronal, middle, and apical thirds of root canals instrumented with three HERO rotary systems.
    Câmara AC; Aguiar CM; Poli de Figueiredo JA
    J Endod; 2007 Dec; 33(12):1460-3. PubMed ID: 18037059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.