BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22703697)

  • 1. Contrast-enhanced EUS for differential diagnosis of pancreatic mass lesions: a meta-analysis.
    Gong TT; Hu DM; Zhu Q
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Aug; 76(2):301-9. PubMed ID: 22703697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for differential diagnosis of pancreatic mass lesions: a meta-analysis.
    Lin LZ; Li F; Liu Y; Xing LX; Du LF
    Med Ultrason; 2016 Jun; 18(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 27239649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. EUS elastography for diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses: a meta-analysis.
    Mei M; Ni J; Liu D; Jin P; Sun L
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Apr; 77(4):578-89. PubMed ID: 23199646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic value of EUS elastography in differentiation of benign and malignant solid pancreatic masses: a meta-analysis.
    Pei Q; Zou X; Zhang X; Chen M; Guo Y; Luo H
    Pancreatology; 2012; 12(5):402-8. PubMed ID: 23127527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantitative contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography for the discrimination of solid pancreatic masses.
    Seicean A; Badea R; Stan-Iuga R; Mocan T; Gulei I; Pascu O
    Ultraschall Med; 2010 Dec; 31(6):571-6. PubMed ID: 21080306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. EUS elastography for the differentiation of benign and malignant lymph nodes: a meta-analysis.
    Xu W; Shi J; Zeng X; Li X; Xie WF; Guo J; Lin Y
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Nov; 74(5):1001-9; quiz 1115.e1-4. PubMed ID: 22032315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical utility of endoscopic ultrasound elastography for identification of malignant pancreatic masses: a meta-analysis.
    Ying L; Lin X; Xie ZL; Hu YP; Tang KF; Shi KQ
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 Sep; 28(9):1434-43. PubMed ID: 23731128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of K-ras gene mutation analysis in EUS-guided FNA cytology specimens for the differential diagnosis of pancreatic solid masses: a meta-analysis of prospective studies.
    Fuccio L; Hassan C; Laterza L; Correale L; Pagano N; Bocus P; Fabbri C; Maimone A; Cennamo V; Repici A; Costamagna G; Bazzoli F; Larghi A
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Oct; 78(4):596-608. PubMed ID: 23660563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Endoscopic ultrasound elastography for differential diagnosis of pancreatic masses: a meta-analysis.
    Hu DM; Gong TT; Zhu Q
    Dig Dis Sci; 2013 Apr; 58(4):1125-31. PubMed ID: 23306838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Value of contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography with enhancement pattern for diagnosis of pancreatic cancer: A meta-analysis.
    Yamashita Y; Shimokawa T; Napoléon B; Fusaroli P; Gincul R; Kudo M; Kitano M
    Dig Endosc; 2019 Mar; 31(2):125-133. PubMed ID: 30338569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound for differential diagnosis of pancreatic cancer: an updated meta-analysis.
    He XK; Ding Y; Sun LM
    Oncotarget; 2017 Sep; 8(39):66392-66401. PubMed ID: 29029521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound in solid lesions of the pancreas: results of a pilot study.
    Napoleon B; Alvarez-Sanchez MV; Gincoul R; Pujol B; Lefort C; Lepilliez V; Labadie M; Souquet JC; Queneau PE; Scoazec JY; Chayvialle JA; Ponchon T
    Endoscopy; 2010 Jul; 42(7):564-70. PubMed ID: 20593334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantitative contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS in differential diagnosis of focal pancreatic masses (with videos).
    Săftoiu A; Vilmann P; Dietrich CF; Iglesias-Garcia J; Hocke M; Seicean A; Ignee A; Hassan H; Streba CT; Ioncică AM; Gheonea DI; Ciurea T
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Jul; 82(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 25792386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. EUS-guided FNA for diagnosis of solid pancreatic neoplasms: a meta-analysis.
    Hewitt MJ; McPhail MJ; Possamai L; Dhar A; Vlavianos P; Monahan KJ
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Feb; 75(2):319-31. PubMed ID: 22248600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contrast-Enhanced EUS for Differential Diagnosis of Pancreatic Masses: A Meta-Analysis.
    Mei S; Wang M; Sun L
    Gastroenterol Res Pract; 2019; 2019():1670183. PubMed ID: 30962802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Combined contrast-enhanced power Doppler and real-time sonoelastography performed during EUS, used in the differential diagnosis of focal pancreatic masses (with videos).
    Săftoiu A; Iordache SA; Gheonea DI; Popescu C; Maloş A; Gorunescu F; Ciurea T; Iordache A; Popescu GL; Manea CT
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Oct; 72(4):739-47. PubMed ID: 20674916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Endoscopic ultrasound elastography in the diagnosis of pancreatic masses: A meta-analysis.
    Zhang B; Zhu F; Li P; Yu S; Zhao Y; Li M
    Pancreatology; 2018 Oct; 18(7):833-840. PubMed ID: 30093353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantitative endoscopic ultrasound elastography: an accurate method for the differentiation of solid pancreatic masses.
    Iglesias-Garcia J; Larino-Noia J; Abdulkader I; Forteza J; Dominguez-Munoz JE
    Gastroenterology; 2010 Oct; 139(4):1172-80. PubMed ID: 20600020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Echo-enhanced color- and power-Doppler EUS for the discrimination between focal pancreatitis and pancreatic carcinoma.
    Becker D; Strobel D; Bernatik T; Hahn EG
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2001 Jun; 53(7):784-9. PubMed ID: 11375592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Digital image analysis of EUS images accurately differentiates pancreatic cancer from chronic pancreatitis and normal tissue.
    Das A; Nguyen CC; Li F; Li B
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2008 May; 67(6):861-7. PubMed ID: 18179797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.