These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22704005)

  • 1. Letter to the editor (Wright-Walters et al., 2011).
    Hentges S; Caspers N; Klecka GM; Mihaich EM; Ortego L; Staples CA
    Sci Total Environ; 2013 Apr; 450-451():369-71. PubMed ID: 22704005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An updated weight of evidence approach to the aquatic hazard assessment of Bisphenol A and the derivation a new predicted no effect concentration (Pnec) using a non-parametric methodology.
    Wright-Walters M; Volz C; Talbott E; Davis D
    Sci Total Environ; 2011 Jan; 409(4):676-85. PubMed ID: 21130487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exploring QSTR analysis of the toxicity of phenols and thiophenols using machine learning methods.
    Asadollahi-Baboli M
    Environ Toxicol Pharmacol; 2012 Nov; 34(3):826-31. PubMed ID: 23068157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantitative structure-activity relationship for prediction of the toxicity of phenols on Photobacterium phosphoreum.
    Li X; Wang Z; Liu H; Yu H
    Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 2012 Jul; 89(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 22562268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A new biological test utilising the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae for the rapid detection of toxic substances in water.
    Rumlova L; Dolezalova J
    Environ Toxicol Pharmacol; 2012 May; 33(3):459-64. PubMed ID: 22407169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evidence from whole-sediment, porewater, and elutriate testing in toxicity assessment of contaminated sediments.
    Liss W; Ahlf W
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 1997 Mar; 36(2):140-7. PubMed ID: 9126431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of the ecotoxicity data submitted within the framework of the REACH Regulation. Part 2. Experimental aquatic toxicity assays.
    Tarazona JV; Sobanska MA; Cesnaitis R; Sobanski T; Bonnomet V; Versonnen B; De Coen W
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 Feb; 472():137-45. PubMed ID: 24291139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The combined toxic effects of nonpolar narcotic chemicals to Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata.
    Hsieh SH; Tsai KP; Chen CY
    Water Res; 2006 Jun; 40(10):1957-64. PubMed ID: 16687162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Policy reforms to update chemical safety testing.
    Nel AE; Malloy TF
    Science; 2017 Mar; 355(6329):1016-1018. PubMed ID: 28280165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A new type of effect of potentially hazardous substances: uncouplers of pelagial-benthal coupling.
    Ostroumov SA
    Dokl Biol Sci; 2002; 383():127-30. PubMed ID: 12053562
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Assessment of the relationship of properties of chemical compounds and their toxicity to a unified hygienic standardization for chemicals].
    Trushkov VF; Perminov KA; Sapozhnikova VV; Ignatova OL
    Gig Sanit; 2013; (2):87-90. PubMed ID: 24003710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development and strategic use of alternative tests in assessing the hazard of chemicals.
    Purchase IF
    Arch Toxicol Suppl; 1998; 20():71-80. PubMed ID: 9442283
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Immunotoxicity: hazard identification and risk assessment.
    Luster MI; Kimber I
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 1996 Dec; 15(12):947-8. PubMed ID: 8981097
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Emerging arsenic threat in Canada.
    Martinez VD; Vucic EA; Lam S; Lam WL
    Science; 2013 Nov; 342(6158):559. PubMed ID: 24179203
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Geochemistry. An arsenic forecast for China.
    Michael HA
    Science; 2013 Aug; 341(6148):852-3. PubMed ID: 23970688
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Prospects of the use of a quantitative functional-morphological method in the evaluation of toxicity of chemical substances].
    Popuchiyev VV
    Med Tr Prom Ekol; 1995; (12):24-7. PubMed ID: 8673382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The EU REACH system: opportunities and threats.
    Balls M
    Altern Lab Anim; 2006 Mar; 34 Suppl 1():1-4. PubMed ID: 16555954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bioassay-directed identification of toxicants in sediments of Liaohe River, northeast China.
    He Y; Xu J; Guo C; Lv J; Zhang Y; Meng W
    Environ Pollut; 2016 Dec; 219():663-671. PubMed ID: 27376991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Variation in tolerance to common marine pollutants among different populations in two species of the marine copepod Tigriopus.
    Sun PY; Foley HB; Bao VW; Leung KM; Edmands S
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2015 Oct; 22(20):16143-52. PubMed ID: 26070741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Toxicity evaluation of a municipal dump leachate using zebrafish acute tests.
    Sisinno CL; Oliveira-Filho EC; Dufrayer MC; Moreira JC; Paumgartten FJ
    Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 2000 Jan; 64(1):107-13. PubMed ID: 10606701
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.