These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22704458)

  • 1. Semi-automated CCTV surveillance: the effects of system confidence, system accuracy and task complexity on operator vigilance, reliance and workload.
    Dadashi N; Stedmon AW; Pridmore TP
    Appl Ergon; 2013 Sep; 44(5):730-8. PubMed ID: 22704458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Factors affecting performance on a target monitoring task employing an automatic tracker.
    McFadden SM; Vimalachandran A; Blackmore E
    Ergonomics; 2004 Feb; 47(3):257-80. PubMed ID: 14668161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of automated decision aids on performance, operator behaviour and workload in a simulated supervisory control task.
    Röttger S; Bali K; Manzey D
    Ergonomics; 2009 May; 52(5):512-23. PubMed ID: 19296323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Level of automation effects on performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task.
    Endsley MR; Kaber DB
    Ergonomics; 1999 Mar; 42(3):462-92. PubMed ID: 10048306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Performance, workload, and fatigue changes associated with automation.
    Harris WC; Hancock PA; Arthur EJ; Caird JK
    Int J Aviat Psychol; 1995; 5(2):169-85. PubMed ID: 11540255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automated assistance for human factors analysis in complex systems.
    Gregoriades A; Sutcliffe AG
    Ergonomics; 2006 Oct 10-22; 49(12-13):1265-87. PubMed ID: 17008256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Driving with a Congestion Assistant; mental workload and acceptance.
    Brookhuis KA; van Driel CJ; Hof T; van Arem B; Hoedemaeker M
    Appl Ergon; 2009 Nov; 40(6):1019-25. PubMed ID: 18823875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Trust in automation. Part II. Experimental studies of trust and human intervention in a process control simulation.
    Muir BM; Moray N
    Ergonomics; 1996 Mar; 39(3):429-60. PubMed ID: 8849495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. EEG correlates of task engagement and mental workload in vigilance, learning, and memory tasks.
    Berka C; Levendowski DJ; Lumicao MN; Yau A; Davis G; Zivkovic VT; Olmstead RE; Tremoulet PD; Craven PL
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2007 May; 78(5 Suppl):B231-44. PubMed ID: 17547324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of a brain-based adaptive system and a manual adaptable system for invoking automation.
    Bailey NR; Scerbo MW; Freeman FG; Mikulka PJ; Scott LA
    Hum Factors; 2006; 48(4):693-709. PubMed ID: 17240718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Human-automation interaction for multiple robot control: the effect of varying automation assistance and individual differences on operator performance.
    Wright JL; Chen JYC; Barnes MJ
    Ergonomics; 2018 Aug; 61(8):1033-1045. PubMed ID: 29451105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Automation transparency: implications of uncertainty communication for human-automation interaction and interfaces.
    Kunze A; Summerskill SJ; Marshall R; Filtness AJ
    Ergonomics; 2019 Mar; 62(3):345-360. PubMed ID: 30501566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of extended lay-off periods on performance and operator trust under adaptable automation.
    Chavaillaz A; Wastell D; Sauer J
    Appl Ergon; 2016 Mar; 53 Pt A():241-51. PubMed ID: 26603139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of display design on performance in a simulated ship navigation environment.
    Sauer J; Wastell DG; Hockey GR; Crawshaw CM; Ishak M; Downing JC
    Ergonomics; 2002 Apr; 45(5):329-47. PubMed ID: 12028719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Designing automation for human use: empirical studies and quantitative models.
    Parasuraman R
    Ergonomics; 2000 Jul; 43(7):931-51. PubMed ID: 10929828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Individual differences in response to automation: the five factor model of personality.
    Szalma JL; Taylor GS
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2011 Jun; 17(2):71-96. PubMed ID: 21688932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Work exposure and vigilance decrements in closed circuit television surveillance.
    Donald F; Donald C; Thatcher A
    Appl Ergon; 2015 Mar; 47():220-8. PubMed ID: 25479991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Trust, control strategies and allocation of function in human-machine systems.
    Lee J; Moray N
    Ergonomics; 1992 Oct; 35(10):1243-70. PubMed ID: 1516577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of a psychophysiological system for adaptive automation on performance, workload, and the event-related potential P300 component.
    Prinzel LJ; Freeman FG; Scerbo MW; Mikulka PJ; Pope AT
    Hum Factors; 2003 winter; 45(4):601-13. PubMed ID: 15055457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automation, task difficulty, and aircrew performance.
    Bowers C; Thornton C; Braun C; Morgan BB; Salas E
    Mil Psychol; 1998; 10(4):259-74. PubMed ID: 11541776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.