These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

386 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22704766)

  • 1. A randomized trial of preinduction cervical ripening: dinoprostone vaginal insert versus double-balloon catheter.
    Cromi A; Ghezzi F; Uccella S; Agosti M; Serati M; Marchitelli G; Bolis P
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Aug; 207(2):125.e1-7. PubMed ID: 22704766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A randomized comparison of prostaglandin E2, oxytocin, and the double-balloon device in inducing labor.
    Atad J; Hallak M; Auslender R; Porat-Packer T; Zarfati D; Abramovici H
    Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Feb; 87(2):223-7. PubMed ID: 8559528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Which is the safer method of labor induction for oligohydramnios women? Transcervical double balloon catheter or dinoprostone vaginal insert.
    Wang W; Zheng J; Fu J; Zhang X; Ma Q; Yu S; Li M; Hou L
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Nov; 27(17):1805-8. PubMed ID: 24397441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Clinical analysis of double-balloon catheter for cervical ripening in 66 cases].
    He Y; Hu J; Zhang X; Huang H; Chen Q
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Oct; 49(10):741-5. PubMed ID: 25537244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of two preparations of dinoprostone for pre-induction of labour in nulliparous women with very unfavourable cervical condition: a randomised clinical trial.
    Facchinetti F; Venturini P; Verocchi G; Volpe A
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Apr; 119(2):189-93. PubMed ID: 15808378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Labor induction in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix: double balloon catheter versus dinoprostone.
    Suffecool K; Rosenn BM; Kam S; Mushi J; Foroutan J; Herrera K
    J Perinat Med; 2014 Mar; 42(2):213-8. PubMed ID: 24096438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Double-balloon catheter compared to vaginal dinoprostone for cervical ripening in obese women at term].
    Grange J; Dimet J; Vital M; Le Thuaut A; Ducarme G
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2017 Oct; 45(10):521-527. PubMed ID: 28757105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Double-balloon catheter vs. dinoprostone vaginal insert for induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix.
    Du C; Liu Y; Liu Y; Ding H; Zhang R; Tan J
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Jun; 291(6):1221-7. PubMed ID: 25408273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pre-induction cervical ripening: comparing between two vaginal preparations of dinoprostone in women with an unfavorable cervix.
    Ashwal E; Hiersch L; Melamed N; Manor Y; Wiznitzer A; Hod M; Yogev Y
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Dec; 27(18):1874-9. PubMed ID: 24417462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Double-balloon catheter and sequential vaginal prostaglandin E2 versus vaginal prostaglandin E2 alone for induction of labor after previous cesarean section.
    Kehl S; Weiss C; Wamsler M; Beyer J; Dammer U; Heimrich J; Faschingbauer F; Sütterlin M; Beckmann MW; Schleussner E
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Apr; 293(4):757-65. PubMed ID: 26437956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Cervical ripening and labor induction: Evaluation of single balloon catheter compared to double balloon catheter and dinoprostone insert].
    Pez V; Deruelle P; Kyheng M; Boyon C; Clouqueur E; Garabedian C
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2018; 46(7-8):570-574. PubMed ID: 29903553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A randomized controlled trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter plus oxytocin for labor induction.
    Moraes Filho OB; Albuquerque RM; Cecatti JG
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 Aug; 89(8):1045-52. PubMed ID: 20636243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Double-balloon device and intravaginal dinoprostone for cervical ripening in women with unfavourable cervix].
    Letailleur M; Mathieu N; Dietrich G; Lethuilier C; Verspyck E; Marpeau L
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2015 Jun; 43(6):424-30. PubMed ID: 25943409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sequential use of double-balloon catheter and oral misoprostol versus oral misoprostol alone for induction of labour at term (CRBplus trial): a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial.
    Kehl S; Ziegler J; Schleussner E; Tuschy B; Berlit S; Kirscht J; Hägele F; Weiss C; Siemer J; Sütterlin M
    BJOG; 2015 Jan; 122(1):129-36. PubMed ID: 25327872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transcervical Foley balloon catheter and vaginal prostaglandin E2 insert combination vs. vaginal prostaglandin E2 insert only for induction of labor at term: a randomized clinical trial.
    Eser A; Ozkaya E; Abide CY; Eser T; Eser GY; Abike F; Tayyar AT; Eroglu M
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2019 Feb; 299(2):451-457. PubMed ID: 30536117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Combination of Foley and prostaglandins versus Foley and oxytocin for cervical ripening: a network meta-analysis.
    Orr L; Reisinger-Kindle K; Roy A; Levine L; Connolly K; Visintainer P; Schoen CN
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Nov; 223(5):743.e1-743.e17. PubMed ID: 32387325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Randomized trial of vaginal prostaglandin E2 versus oxytocin for labor induction in term premature rupture of membranes.
    Kunt C; Kanat-Pektas M; Gungor AN; Kurt RK; Ozat M; Gulerman C; Gungor T; Mollamahmutoglu L
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Mar; 49(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 20466294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is transcervical Foley catheter actually slower than prostaglandins in ripening the cervix? A randomized study.
    Cromi A; Ghezzi F; Agosti M; Serati M; Uccella S; Arlant V; Bolis P
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Apr; 204(4):338.e1-7. PubMed ID: 21272849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preinduction cervical ripening techniques compared.
    Greybush M; Singleton C; Atlas RO; Balducci J; Rust OA
    J Reprod Med; 2001 Jan; 46(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 11209625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tension compared to no tension on a Foley transcervical catheter for cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial.
    Fruhman G; Gavard JA; Amon E; Flick KV; Miller C; Gross GA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 216(1):67.e1-67.e9. PubMed ID: 27640940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.