These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22704944)

  • 41. [Changes of the anterior eye segment after eye muscle surgery--evaluation by optical coherence tomography in children].
    Haeussler-Sinangin Y; Muller L; Schalnus R; Kohnen T; Lüchtenberg M
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2009 Sep; 226(9):747-51. PubMed ID: 19517353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Evaluation of corneal anaesthesia after the application of topical 0.5% bupivacaine, 2% lidocaine and 0.4% oxybuprocaine in normal horses.
    Makra Z; Eördögh R; Fábián I; Veres-Nyéki K
    Vet Anaesth Analg; 2021 Nov; 48(6):972-976. PubMed ID: 34538596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [Effect of brimonidine on central corneal thickness].
    Grüb M; Mielke J; Schlote T; Rohrbach M
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2012 Mar; 229(3):236-40. PubMed ID: 22161473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with optical low-coherence reflectometry and ultrasound pachymetry and reproducibility of both devices.
    Koktekir BE; Gedik S; Bakbak B
    Cornea; 2012 Nov; 31(11):1278-81. PubMed ID: 22262222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [How does central cornea thickness influence intraocular pressure during applanation and contour tonometry?].
    Schwenteck T; Knappe M; Moros I
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2012 Sep; 229(9):917-27. PubMed ID: 22972357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Comparison of Proparacaine, Tetracaine, and Oxybuprocaine in Corneal Sensitivity Measurement.
    Dias PB; Rodrigues Parchen MDA; Wasilewski D
    J Ocul Pharmacol Ther; 2024 May; 40(4):215-221. PubMed ID: 38597912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comparison of the precision of the Topcon SP-3000P specular microscope and an ultrasound pachymeter.
    Almubrad TM; Osuagwu UL; Alabbadi I; Ogbuehi KC
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2011; 5():871-6. PubMed ID: 21760714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Identifying relationships between tomography-derived corneal thickness, curvature, and diameter and in vivo confocal microscopic assessment of the endothelium in healthy corneas of young adults.
    Patel HY; Patel DV; McGhee CN
    Eye (Lond); 2009 Feb; 23(2):270-8. PubMed ID: 18259207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Pachymetry before or after applanation tonometry: does it matter?
    Pourjavan S; Deghislage C; Van Malderen L; Zeyen T
    Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol; 2005; (296):51-5. PubMed ID: 16050419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Effect of 0.4% benoxinate hydrochloride on corneal sensitivity, measured using the non-contact corneal aesthesiometer (NCCA).
    Murphy PJ; Blades KJ; Patel S
    Optom Vis Sci; 1997 Dec; 74(12):1025-9. PubMed ID: 9423994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The impact of common classes of topical antiglaucoma medications on central corneal thickness--own observations.
    Wierzbowska J; Łagocka A; Siemiatkowska A; Robaszkiewicz J; Stankiewicz A; Sierdziński J
    Klin Oczna; 2009; 111(10-12):323-6. PubMed ID: 20169887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The relationship between diurnal variations in intraocular pressure measurements and central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis.
    Kotecha A; Crabb DP; Spratt A; Garway-Heath DF
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Sep; 50(9):4229-36. PubMed ID: 19407025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Corneal thickness- and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer.
    Kotecha A; Elsheikh A; Roberts CR; Zhu H; Garway-Heath DF
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Dec; 47(12):5337-47. PubMed ID: 17122122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Factors influencing central corneal thickness in a Turkish population.
    Altinok A; Sen E; Yazici A; Aksakal FN; Oncul H; Koklu G
    Curr Eye Res; 2007 May; 32(5):413-9. PubMed ID: 17514526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Assessment of central corneal thickness in normal, keratoconus, and post-laser in situ keratomileusis eyes using Scheimpflug imaging, spectral domain optical coherence tomography, and ultrasound pachymetry.
    Grewal DS; Brar GS; Grewal SP
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Jun; 36(6):954-64. PubMed ID: 20494767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Repeatability of central corneal thickness measurements measured with the Topcon SP2000P specular microscope.
    Ogbuehi KC; Almubrad TM
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2005 Aug; 243(8):798-802. PubMed ID: 16133035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Associations between diurnal changes in Goldmann tonometry, corneal geometry, and ocular response analyzer parameters.
    Lau W; Pye DC
    Cornea; 2012 Jun; 31(6):639-44. PubMed ID: 22382592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Central corneal thickness and measured IOP: a clinical study.
    Phillips LJ; Cakanac CJ; Eger MW; Lilly ME
    Optometry; 2003 Apr; 74(4):218-25. PubMed ID: 12703686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry in keratoconus.
    Unterlauft JD; Schädle N; Kasper K; Klink T; Geerling G
    Cornea; 2011 Oct; 30(10):1078-82. PubMed ID: 21716097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Repeatability and interobserver reproducibility of Artemis-2 high-frequency ultrasound in determination of human corneal thickness.
    Ogbuehi KC; Osuagwu UL
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2012; 6():761-9. PubMed ID: 22693418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.