These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22705168)

  • 1. Brain potentials in outcome evaluation: when social comparison takes effect.
    Wu Y; Zhang D; Elieson B; Zhou X
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Aug; 85(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 22705168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interpersonal relationship modulates brain responses to outcome evaluation when gambling for/against others: an electrophysiological analysis.
    Leng Y; Zhou X
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Oct; 63():205-14. PubMed ID: 25218954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modulation of the brain activity in outcome evaluation by interpersonal relationship: an ERP study.
    Leng Y; Zhou X
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jan; 48(2):448-55. PubMed ID: 19822163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Loss feedback negativity elicited by single- versus conjoined-feature stimuli.
    Liu Y; Gehring WJ
    Neuroreport; 2009 Apr; 20(6):632-6. PubMed ID: 19293730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceptual properties of feedback stimuli influence the feedback-related negativity in the flanker gambling task.
    Liu Y; Nelson LD; Bernat EM; Gehring WJ
    Psychophysiology; 2014 Aug; 51(8):782-8. PubMed ID: 24673119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Self-reflection modulates the outcome evaluation process: Evidence from an ERP study.
    Zhu X; Gu R; Wu H; Luo Y
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Dec; 98(3 Pt 1):389-93. PubMed ID: 26255975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. When people matter more than money: an ERPs study.
    Rigoni D; Polezzi D; Rumiati R; Guarino R; Sartori G
    Brain Res Bull; 2010 Mar; 81(4-5):445-52. PubMed ID: 20006683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How friendly is a little friendly competition? Evidence of self-interest and empathy during outcome evaluation.
    Wang Y; Yuan B; Roberts K; Wang Y; Lin C; Simons RF
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Mar; 91(3):155-62. PubMed ID: 24149211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Social value orientation modulates context-based social comparison preference in the outcome evaluation: An ERP study.
    Qi Y; Wu H; Raiha S; Liu X
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Apr; 112():135-144. PubMed ID: 29501790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Age-dependent characteristics of feedback evaluation related to monetary gains and losses.
    Kardos Z; Tóth B; Boha R; File B; Molnár M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2017 Dec; 122():42-49. PubMed ID: 27235583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Manipulation of feedback expectancy and valence induces negative and positive reward prediction error signals manifest in event-related brain potentials.
    Pfabigan DM; Alexopoulos J; Bauer H; Sailer U
    Psychophysiology; 2011 May; 48(5):656-64. PubMed ID: 21039585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. P300, not feedback error-related negativity, manifests the waiting cost of receiving reward information.
    Wang J; Chen J; Lei Y; Li P
    Neuroreport; 2014 Sep; 25(13):1044-8. PubMed ID: 25004079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Problem gamblers exhibit reward hypersensitivity in medial frontal cortex during gambling.
    Oberg SA; Christie GJ; Tata MS
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Nov; 49(13):3768-75. PubMed ID: 21982697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interpersonal relationships modulate outcome evaluation in a social comparison context: The pain and pleasure of intimacy.
    Zhang H; Zhang M; Lu J; Zhao L; Zhao D; Xiao C; Gu R; Luo W
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2020 Feb; 20(1):115-127. PubMed ID: 31823210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The feedback-related negativity reflects the binary evaluation of good versus bad outcomes.
    Hajcak G; Moser JS; Holroyd CB; Simons RF
    Biol Psychol; 2006 Feb; 71(2):148-54. PubMed ID: 16005561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of the diffusion of responsibility effect on outcome evaluations: electrophysiological evidence from an ERP study.
    Li P; Jia S; Feng T; Liu Q; Suo T; Li H
    Neuroimage; 2010 Oct; 52(4):1727-33. PubMed ID: 20452440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Feedback and reward processing in high-functioning autism.
    Larson MJ; South M; Krauskopf E; Clawson A; Crowley MJ
    Psychiatry Res; 2011 May; 187(1-2):198-203. PubMed ID: 21122921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genetic variability in the dopamine system (dopamine receptor D4, catechol-O-methyltransferase) modulates neurophysiological responses to gains and losses.
    Marco-Pallarés J; Cucurell D; Cunillera T; Krämer UM; Càmara E; Nager W; Bauer P; Schüle R; Schöls L; Münte TF; Rodriguez-Fornells A
    Biol Psychiatry; 2009 Jul; 66(2):154-61. PubMed ID: 19251248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Context-based interpersonal relationship modulates social comparison between outcomes: an event-related potential study.
    Zhang H; Gu R; Yang M; Zhang M; Han F; Li H; Luo W
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2021 Mar; 16(4):439-452. PubMed ID: 33527110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. It is less than you expected: the feedback-related negativity reflects violations of reward magnitude expectations.
    Bellebaum C; Polezzi D; Daum I
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Sep; 48(11):3343-50. PubMed ID: 20655319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.