These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2270614)

  • 1. [Vertical movement of teeth following preparation for inlays with preservation of cavity walls].
    Schwarzburg G; Glockmann I; Barthelmä B; Arzt M
    Stomatol DDR; 1990 Aug; 40(8):339-40. PubMed ID: 2270614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fracture resistance of maxillary premolars restored with direct and indirect adhesive techniques.
    Santos MJ; Bezerra RB
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2005 Sep; 71(8):585. PubMed ID: 16202199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fracture resistance of teeth directly and indirectly restored with composite resin and indirectly restored with ceramic materials.
    Dalpino PH; Francischone CE; Ishikiriama A; Franco EB
    Am J Dent; 2002 Dec; 15(6):389-94. PubMed ID: 12691276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Molar fracture resistance after adhesive restoration with ceramic inlays or resin-based composites.
    Bremer BD; Geurtsen W
    Am J Dent; 2001 Aug; 14(4):216-20. PubMed ID: 11699740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pin-retained restorations for severely worn posterior teeth.
    Williamson R
    Compendium; 1993 Nov; 14(11):1412, 1414, 1416 passim; quiz 1422. PubMed ID: 8620378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of restoration method on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars.
    Yamada Y; Tsubota Y; Fukushima S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(1):94-8. PubMed ID: 15008239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Conservative indirect restorations for posterior teeth. Cast versus bonded ceramic.
    Donovan TE; Chee WW
    Dent Clin North Am; 1993 Jul; 37(3):433-43. PubMed ID: 8348996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Amalgam onlay restoration].
    Doukoudakis S
    Hell Stomatol Chron; 1989; 33(3):191-8. PubMed ID: 2486357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Loss of sound tooth structure when replacing amalgam restorations by adhesive inlays.
    Moscovich H; Creugers NH; De Kanter RJ; Roeters FJ
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(6):327-31. PubMed ID: 9855856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Three-year clinical evaluation of direct and indirect composite restorations in posterior teeth.
    Manhart J; Neuerer P; Scheibenbogen-Fuchsbrunner A; Hickel R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Sep; 84(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 11005901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Resistance to maxillary premolar fractures after restoration of class II preparations with resin composite or ceromer.
    de Freitas CR; Miranda MI; de Andrade MF; Flores VH; Vaz LG; Guimarães C
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Sep; 33(8):589-94. PubMed ID: 12238690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cuspal deflection of maxillary premolars restored with bonded amalgam.
    el-Badrawy WA
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(6):337-43. PubMed ID: 10823082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Structural optimization of dental restorations using the principle of adaptive growth.
    Couegnat G; Fok SL; Cooper JE; Qualtrough AJ
    Dent Mater; 2006 Jan; 22(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 16061281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cavity preparation factors and microleakage of Class II composite restorations filled at intraoral temperatures.
    Hilton TJ; Ferracane JL
    Am J Dent; 1999 Jun; 12(3):123-30. PubMed ID: 10649934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Newer Class I cavity preparation for permanent teeth using air abrasion and composite restoration.
    Ferdianakis K; White GE
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999; 23(3):201-16. PubMed ID: 10686867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Restoration of posterior teeth with composite resin. 1: Direct-placement composite.
    Rees JS; Jacobsen PH
    Dent Update; 1996 Dec; 23(10):406-10. PubMed ID: 9610271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preparation modifications for damaged vital posterior teeth.
    Shillingburg HT; Jacobi R; Brackett SE
    Dent Clin North Am; 1985 Apr; 29(2):305-26. PubMed ID: 3888700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Restoration of cusped teeth using composite resins: direct or indirect method?].
    Harb-Kadiri J; Khairallah W
    Chir Dent Fr; 1986 Mar; 56(329):43-7. PubMed ID: 3519115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Class III posterior composite restoration.
    Lacy AM
    Dent Today; 2002 Mar; 21(3):80-2, 84-5. PubMed ID: 11915224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cuspal deflection, strain and microleakage of endodontically treated premolar teeth restored with direct resin composites.
    Taha NA; Palamara JE; Messer HH
    J Dent; 2009 Sep; 37(9):724-30. PubMed ID: 19581032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.