These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22707289)

  • 1. Clinical validation of the new T- and Y-shape models for the quantitative analysis of coronary bifurcations: an interobserver variability study.
    Tuinenburg JC; Janssen JP; Kooistra R; Koning G; Corral MD; Lansky AJ; Reiber JH
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 May; 81(6):E225-36. PubMed ID: 22707289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An angiographic tool for risk prediction of side branch occlusion in coronary bifurcation intervention: the RESOLVE score system (Risk prEdiction of Side branch OccLusion in coronary bifurcation interVEntion).
    Dou K; Zhang D; Xu B; Yang Y; Yin D; Qiao S; Wu Y; Yan H; You S; Wang Y; Wu Z; Gao R; Kirtane AJ
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Jan; 8(1 Pt A):39-46. PubMed ID: 25616815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Usefulness of the Finet law to guide stent size selection in ostial left main stenting: Comparison with standard angiographic estimation.
    Rigatelli G; Zuin M; Ronco F; Caprioglio F; Cavazzini D; Giatti S; Braggion G; Perilli S; Nguyen VT
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2018 Oct; 19(7 Pt A):751-754. PubMed ID: 29706477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro validation and comparison of different software packages or algorithms for coronary bifurcation analysis using calibrated phantoms: implications for clinical practice and research of bifurcation stenting.
    Ishibashi Y; Grundeken MJ; Nakatani S; Iqbal J; Morel MA; Généreux P; Girasis C; Wentzel JJ; Garcia-Garcia HM; Onuma Y; Serruys PW
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Mar; 85(4):554-63. PubMed ID: 25059819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Study of Coronary Bifurcation Shape in a Normal Population.
    Medrano-Gracia P; Ormiston J; Webster M; Beier S; Ellis C; Wang C; Smedby Ö; Young A; Cowan B
    J Cardiovasc Transl Res; 2017 Feb; 10(1):82-90. PubMed ID: 28028693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The need for dedicated bifurcation quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) software algorithms to evaluate bifurcation lesions.
    Grundeken MJ; Ishibashi Y; Ramcharitar S; Tuinenburg JC; Reiber JH; Tu S; Aben JP; Girasis C; Wykrzykowska JJ; Onuma Y; Serruys PW
    EuroIntervention; 2015; 11 Suppl V():V44-9. PubMed ID: 25983170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Coronary bifurcation stent morphology in dual-source CT: validation with micro-CT.
    Eom HJ; Yang DH; Kim YH; Roh JH; Kweon J; Kang SJ; Kim N; Kang JW; Lim TH
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Nov; 32(11):1659-1665. PubMed ID: 27503550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of coronary anatomy and stenting technique on long-term outcome after drug-eluting stent implantation for unprotected left main coronary artery disease.
    Tiroch K; Mehilli J; Byrne RA; Schulz S; Massberg S; Laugwitz KL; Vorpahl M; Seyfarth M; Kastrati A;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jan; 7(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 24332416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Low-dose dual-source CT angiography with iterative reconstruction for coronary artery stent evaluation.
    Eisentopf J; Achenbach S; Ulzheimer S; Layritz C; Wuest W; May M; Lell M; Ropers D; Klinghammer L; Daniel WG; Pflederer T
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Apr; 6(4):458-65. PubMed ID: 23498678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A novel noninvasive technology for treatment planning using virtual coronary stenting and computed tomography-derived computed fractional flow reserve.
    Kim KH; Doh JH; Koo BK; Min JK; Erglis A; Yang HM; Park KW; Lee HY; Kang HJ; Kim YJ; Lee SY; Kim HS
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jan; 7(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 24332418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating stent optimisation technique (StentBoost®) in a dedicated bifurcation stent (the Tryton™).
    Fysal Z; Hyde T; Barnes E; McCrea W; Ramcharitar S
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2014 Mar; 15(2):92-6. PubMed ID: 24560297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Image-based quantification of 3D morphology for bifurcations in the left coronary artery: Application to stent design.
    Ellwein L; Marks DS; Migrino RQ; Foley WD; Sherman S; LaDisa JF
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Jun; 87(7):1244-55. PubMed ID: 27251470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Advanced three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiographic assessment of bifurcation lesions: methodology and phantom validation.
    Girasis C; Schuurbiers JC; Muramatsu T; Aben JP; Onuma Y; Soekhradj S; Morel MA; van Geuns RJ; Wentzel JJ; Serruys PW
    EuroIntervention; 2013 Apr; 8(12):1451-60. PubMed ID: 23680960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual estimation versus different quantitative coronary angiography methods to assess lesion severity in bifurcation lesions.
    Grundeken MJ; Collet C; Ishibashi Y; Généreux P; Muramatsu T; LaSalle L; Kaplan AV; Wykrzykowska JJ; Morel MA; Tijssen JG; de Winter RJ; Onuma Y; Leon MB; Serruys PW
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jun; 91(7):1263-1270. PubMed ID: 28836339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Examination of stent deformation and gap formation after complex stenting of left main coronary artery bifurcations using microfocus computed tomography.
    Murasato Y; Hikichi Y; Horiuchi M
    J Interv Cardiol; 2009 Apr; 22(2):135-44. PubMed ID: 19379472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Calcification analysis by intravascular ultrasound to define a predictor of left circumflex narrowing after cross-over stenting for unprotected left main bifurcation lesions.
    Sato K; Naganuma T; Costopoulos C; Takebayashi H; Goto K; Miyazaki T; Yamane H; Hagikura A; Kikuta Y; Taniguchi M; Hiramatsu S; Latib A; Ito H; Haruta S; Colombo A
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2014 Mar; 15(2):80-5. PubMed ID: 24684758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Automated quantification of stenosis severity on 64-slice CT: a comparison with quantitative coronary angiography.
    Boogers MJ; Schuijf JD; Kitslaar PH; van Werkhoven JM; de Graaf FR; Boersma E; van Velzen JE; Dijkstra J; Adame IM; Kroft LJ; de Roos A; Schreur JH; Heijenbrok MW; Jukema JW; Reiber JH; Bax JJ
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2010 Jul; 3(7):699-709. PubMed ID: 20633847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Two-dimensional quantitative coronary angiographic models for bifurcation segmental analysis: in vitro validation of CAAS against precision manufactured plexiglas phantoms.
    Girasis C; Schuurbiers JC; Onuma Y; Aben JP; Weijers B; Boersma E; Wentzel JJ; Serruys PW
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 May; 77(6):830-9. PubMed ID: 20939040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of acquisition angle differences on three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography.
    Tu S; Holm NR; Koning G; Maeng M; Reiber JH
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Aug; 78(2):214-22. PubMed ID: 21766427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fractional flow reserve and coronary bifurcation anatomy: a novel quantitative model to assess and report the stenosis severity of bifurcation lesions.
    Tu S; Echavarria-Pinto M; von Birgelen C; Holm NR; Pyxaras SA; Kumsars I; Lam MK; Valkenburg I; Toth GG; Li Y; Escaned J; Wijns W; Reiber JH
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Apr; 8(4):564-74. PubMed ID: 25819180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.