These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
327 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22707430)
1. Loss of efficacy and cost-effectiveness when screening colonoscopy is performed by nongastroenterologists. Hassan C; Rex DK; Zullo A; Cooper GS Cancer; 2012 Sep; 118(18):4404-11. PubMed ID: 22707430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Endoscopist-directed propofol administration versus anesthesiologist assistance for colorectal cancer screening: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Hassan C; Rex DK; Cooper GS; Benamouzig R Endoscopy; 2012 May; 44(5):456-64. PubMed ID: 22531982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Primary prevention of colorectal cancer with low-dose aspirin in combination with endoscopy: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Hassan C; Rex DK; Cooper GS; Zullo A; Launois R; Benamouzig R Gut; 2012 Aug; 61(8):1172-9. PubMed ID: 21997545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Projected national impact of colorectal cancer screening on clinical and economic outcomes and health services demand. Ladabaum U; Song K Gastroenterology; 2005 Oct; 129(4):1151-62. PubMed ID: 16230069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost effectiveness and projected national impact of colorectal cancer screening in France. Hassan C; Benamouzig R; Spada C; Ponchon T; Zullo A; Saurin JC; Costamagna G Endoscopy; 2011 Sep; 43(9):780-93. PubMed ID: 21623557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-effectiveness analysis on screening for colorectal neoplasm and management of colorectal cancer in Asia. Tsoi KK; Ng SS; Leung MC; Sung JJ Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2008 Aug; 28(3):353-63. PubMed ID: 18638075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of screening colonoscopy according to the adenoma detection rate. Hassan C; Rex DK; Zullo A; Kaminski MF United European Gastroenterol J; 2015 Apr; 3(2):200-7. PubMed ID: 25984338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Screening based on risk for colorectal cancer is the most cost-effective approach. Dan YY; Chuah BY; Koh DC; Yeoh KG Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2012 Mar; 10(3):266-71.e1-6. PubMed ID: 22100624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Can colonoscopy remain cost-effective for colorectal cancer screening? The impact of practice patterns and the Will Rogers phenomenon on costs. Austin GL; Fennimore B; Ahnen DJ Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Mar; 108(3):296-301. PubMed ID: 23208273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-effectiveness of capsule endoscopy in screening for colorectal cancer. Hassan C; Zullo A; Winn S; Morini S Endoscopy; 2008 May; 40(5):414-21. PubMed ID: 18302080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Colon cancer prevention in Italy: cost-effectiveness analysis with CT colonography and endoscopy. Hassan C; Zullo A; Laghi A; Reitano I; Taggi F; Cerro P; Iafrate F; Giustini M; Winn S; Morini S Dig Liver Dis; 2007 Mar; 39(3):242-50. PubMed ID: 17112797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Endoscopist specialty is associated with incident colorectal cancer after a negative colonoscopy. Rabeneck L; Paszat LF; Saskin R Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2010 Mar; 8(3):275-9. PubMed ID: 19879970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Budget Impact Analysis of Against Colorectal Cancer In Our Neighborhoods (ACCION): A Successful Community-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Program for a Medically Underserved Minority Population. Kim B; Lairson DR; Chung TH; Kim J; Shokar NK Value Health; 2017 Jun; 20(6):809-818. PubMed ID: 28577699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of a selective screening for colorectal carcinoma: the Taiwan Multicenter Cancer Screening (TAMCAS) project. Chen TH; Yen MF; Lai MS; Koong SL; Wang CY; Wong JM; Prevost TC; Duffy SW Cancer; 1999 Oct; 86(7):1116-28. PubMed ID: 10506694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost-effectiveness modeling of colorectal cancer: computed tomography colonography vs colonoscopy or fecal occult blood tests. Lucidarme O; Cadi M; Berger G; Taieb J; Poynard T; Grenier P; Beresniak A Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1413-9. PubMed ID: 21444171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Projections of demand and capacity for colonoscopy related to increasing rates of colorectal cancer screening in the United States. Vijan S; Inadomi J; Hayward RA; Hofer TP; Fendrick AM Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2004 Sep; 20(5):507-15. PubMed ID: 15339322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A simulation model for colorectal cancer screening: potential of stool tests with various performance characteristics compared with screening colonoscopy. Haug U; Brenner H Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2005 Feb; 14(2):422-8. PubMed ID: 15734968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quality of colonoscopy in an organised colorectal cancer screening programme with immunochemical faecal occult blood test: the EQuIPE study (Evaluating Quality Indicators of the Performance of Endoscopy). Zorzi M; Senore C; Da Re F; Barca A; Bonelli LA; Cannizzaro R; Fasoli R; Di Furia L; Di Giulio E; Mantellini P; Naldoni C; Sassatelli R; Rex D; Hassan C; Zappa M; Gut; 2015 Sep; 64(9):1389-96. PubMed ID: 25227521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost effectiveness of colonoscopy, based on the appropriateness of an indication. Hassan C; Di Giulio E; Pickhardt PJ; Zullo A; Laghi A; Kim DH; Iafrate F; Morini S Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Nov; 6(11):1231-6. PubMed ID: 18995214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]